dman.sol (@dman_sol) header
dman.sol (@dman_sol) profile picture

solana eco researcher / $LAYER BAG HOLDER

Joined April 2021
Photo by dman.sol (@dman_sol)Photo by dman.sol (@dman_sol)Photo by dman.sol (@dman_sol)Photo by dman.sol (@dman_sol)Photo by dman.sol (@dman_sol)Photo by dman.sol (@dman_sol)Photo by dman.sol (@dman_sol)Photo by dman.sol (@dman_sol)Photo by dman.sol (@dman_sol)Photo by dman.sol (@dman_sol)
What’s happening with @DeGodsNFT? 100 SOL floor incoming.
This quoted post is unavailable.
6
5
1
115
3,523
dman.sol retweeted
ITS STOCK SZN 🔥️️️️️️ Memory Monday! Our first TradFi markets are live. Two memory chip giants, up to 10x leverage: $SNDK $MU Trade now -> app.bulk.trade/ref/STOCKSZN
48
27
23
133
10,269
Replying to @dotkrueger
funny how the one asset with a fixed supply is still the one called risky
3
1
25
1,417
New Layer 1, same standard of custody. Anchorage Digital Bank and Anchorage Digital Singapore now support native custody for Pearl (PEARL), built by @prlnet. Addresses, deposits, and withdrawals are live for clients today.
15
17
10
124
18,104
In the last 30hrs market action was mayhem - and @bulktrade risk engine performed as expected, saving 335 accounts from getting fully wiped out! BULK processed $60.97m in trading volume, with $14.31 million in average OI.. There were liquidations, yes. There were substantial losses. But across the 335 accounts that underwent liquidation, every account still held an open position immediately after its final reduction This is has been reported overwhelmingly positive exp by our users Looking at the wider numbers, BULK recorded $1.26m in liquidations, while hyperliquid recorded 280m + and binance $818m. (The window also completed with zero recorded ADL events on bulk) Our 24-hour trading volume was 4.56x its gross OI, compared with approx 3.16x for lighter, 1.83x for binance and 1.54x for hyperliquid BULK had the lowest absolute liquidation notional among the four venues, alongside the highest trading turnover relative to gross OI To understand what happened, we need to look deeper into how liquidations work on BULK Whenever an account is selected for liquidation, BULK runs a portfolio optimiser. It evaluates reductions across the account and selects those that most efficiently restore margin health, accounting for correlations, risk contributions. It then recomputes the portfolio and repeats if needed in the next ticks Take account HNHW… > held 11 positions with a $71,000 exposure > by its liquidation at 23:42 UTC, BTC mark price had fallen 2.54%, ETH 2.98% and SOL 4.54% > when the account crossed its liquidation threshold, the engine trimmed its PAXG long by 30% The other ten position quantities were unchanged! All eleven positions remained open - approximately 95.89% of the portfolio’s gross exposure remained after liquidations. The same distinction matters at larger sizes too.. Another account, Ebao.., experienced $883,598 of forced HYPE and ZEC reductions across 21 events. Immediately after its final reduction, it still held both positions and had $58,611 of recorded collateral value, excluding unrealized P&L. Preserving some exposure does not mean avoiding losses. It means the engine can reduce risk without necessarily closing every position in the account Across the full 24hour: > 320 of 335 accounts (95.52%) received partial reductions. > Sixteen individual position legs fully closed across 15 accounts, but those accounts retained their other positions. > The median individual liquidations left 90% of the targeted position’s quantity open..wow another example: on account BLN6.., the engine closed ZEC and HYPE legs and reduced XRP + PUMP longs, while leaving an ETH short of 0.043 untouched. That ETH short was closed later by the user for a profit! We also compared actual portfolios under different margin models Account 97Nq… held a $469,341 portfolio of BTC, ETH and XRP shorts against MON, LIT and HYPE longs. At identical reference prices and equity: BULK’s maintenance requirement was $13,645. Hyperliquid’s standard perpetual cross-margin rules produced $18,283. That is $4,638 of additional maintenance headroom in BULK's calculation We also simulated a real account that was liquidated on Hyperliquid. On 29 oct, an HL account’s 1.19 BTC short approx $97,468 at the liquidation mark - was closed completely We then passed that same state through BULK’s native liquidation logic at the same mark: With assumed fills at the fixed mark, the model retained 45% of the position! Approx 10,880 accounts were fully closed on HL during these events! The aim of a risk engine is to manage exposure robustly as conditions change. On BULK, that includes recognising portfolio offsets, evaluating reductions across the account, and reducing positions in stages where the risk permits For traders, the practical consequence is straightforward: a liquidation intervention can leave meaningful position open - same would be fully closed on other venues, including positions that continue to serve a role in your portfolio. Your hedges should count. Your portfolio should be evaluated as a portfolio. And liquidations should only take whats needed to keep you safe! Keep trading on bulk and we will keep building the best engines to keep you safe 🫡
pretty sure trading on @bulktrade just saved me from massive liquidations... The margin saved is no joke. Just trade on BULK
23
18
10
87
7,592
dman.sol retweeted
my biggest wins ever, both in trad markets and crypto, came from positions I held underwater for extended periods before my thesis eventually played out
68
25
1
308
11,085
dman.sol retweeted
ITS AURA DAYYY 🔥 → Challenger Series ranks have updated → Ranks Gold and above have League Cash to claim → Referral rewards for the week have been PAID Now lets see your rank 👀 app.bulk.trade/challenger
35
21
27
128
17,753
TxFlow is Hyperliquid from Temu They forked Hyperliquid's Arbitrum bridge and changed the name. They copied HyperUnit too and forgot to change the name: txrelay[.]com literally says "Unit is the asset tokenization layer on TxRelay". The frontend, the API and the fees are Hyperliquid's. Even the slogan. The L1 is closed source, with Hyperliquid's naming on everything: TxCore, Tx-BFT, TIPs Hyperliquid is closed source too, but it has 27 validators that each post prices, and anyone can run a node to check them. TxFlow has 5 validators, all its own, nothing you can run, and one key that acts as the entire oracle. The same key sits on the bridge multisig So it's a centralized exchange secured by a 3/4 multisig. Their own audit says those keys "can propose arbitrary withdrawals" And the growth plan is KOLs shilling ref codes
134
76
125
683
150,658
you know who is the top holder of BNB ? Binance and CZ Today Binance got hacked you know much BNB the hacker stole from the biggest holder ? ZERO Inside job
83
130
20
1,389
82,108
Pls avoid Txflow. A total of $24k usd with $11k usd liquidated just now. Price feed was fine. I even added another $4k usd liquidity. However, out of the blue, I experienced margin call. If there was a spike down, I understand. But there wasn’t. If the platform is lagging, that is not acceptable. That is misinformation. I had the exact trade call with variational but there was nothing wrong. Fix your buggy platform: @matthubuilds @Harry_TxFlow This will be the last time touching this platform. Let’s stop the flow.
3
57
Transferable spot options based on Metaplex
1
49
dman.sol retweeted
Habits I stole from ADHD people who are actually doing well. Not "cured." Just no longer at war with their own brain. None of these are "wake up at 5am." Promise. 1. They dont trust their memory. At all.
94
1,138
210
15,189
2,341,119
🚨BREAKING: Decentralized cloud computing network @akashnet has passed a proposal to migrate from the Cosmos chain to @Solana with 98% Yes votes. $AKT, the network’s native token, will launch as an SPL token on Solana.
67
94
9
916
30,354
But what if we just freeze at this price level? Bulls are confident, bears are confident, crabs rule
20
1/ The $PEARL Trading Sprint is live on margin.trade: $10,000 in USDC over 14 days for trading and quoting PEARL. A fresh pool every day. PEARL limit orders near the price earn even if they never fill, and your taker fees come back in full until the pool fills. 🧵
7
15
3
77
19,899
dman.sol retweeted
Hey @frankdegods You would shave off almost 10% of your margin requirement by placing these same trades on @bulktrade Come to the dark side brother
.@frankdegods is still shorting the market at 10-15x leverage. Most these trades are up 30-100%. He is still yet to close. Every trader I know is saying we are going much higher in October, does Frank know something we don't? lol
18
7
73
2,560
solana:So11111111111111111111111111111111111111112 vs solana:4sWNB8zGWHkh6UnmwiEtzNxL4XrN7uK9tosbESbJFfVs
1
58