
@dng_notesi
iAccount based inUnited Arab Emirates
About this account
- Account based in
- United Arab Emirates
- Connected via
- India App Store
Account-level information from X, not a live location or the device used for a specific post.
Creator of https://xitter.cf/t.co/07YJVXCOdt - Unzipping Uncomplicated
Joined March 2026
- Tweets397
- Following29
- Followers18
- Likes70
Pinned Tweet
Extracting one archive is easy. Extracting 20 is a waste of time.
Today we launched EasyUnZip for Windows 🚀
Select your ZIP or RAR files in File Explorer, press Alt + E, and extract them all at once.
• No file uploads • No clutter • No subscription
Try it for free: easyunzip.app
vibe coding is fine.
shipping code you never read to people who paid you isn't.
if your app eats someone's files, "claude wrote it" is not an answer
next build after easyunzip: qkr.si
a remote mcp server, so claude, chatgpt and copilot can all call the same tool.
domain is live on cloudflare. the server isn't yet. building it with codex and claude code, will post the ugly parts
tokens processed is a weird thing to brag about.
36.5 trillion here, 25 trillion there.
my agent re-reading the same repo 40 times also processes a lot of tokens. tell me how many tasks got finished
how i used claude code in august:
one session open all day, type "continue" after every break.
how i use it now:
fresh chat per task, 5 line summary before i step away, codex for the boring stuff.
same plan. way fewer "usage limit reached" screens
question for people paying for more than one:
which $20 plan actually gets you through a day of real coding?
pick one:
100%claude pro
0%chatgpt plus (codex)
0%google ai pro
0%none, i'm out by lunch
1 votes • 17 hourslesson from 50 replies on tuesday:
my 7 word reply to @openaidevs did 1,784 views. my 3 paragraph reply in the same thread, 4 minutes earlier, did 188.
on x the reply that sounds like a person beats the one that sounds like a blog post
lesson from 50 replies yesterday:
my 6 word reply to @openaidevs did 1,727 views. my 3 paragraph reply in the same thread, 4 minutes earlier, did 183.
on x, the reply that sounds like a person beats the one that sounds like a blog post
quick tip for claude code, codex, cursor, whatever:
commit before every agent run. check git diff after.
if a one line fix touched 14 files, don't argue with it. git reset and ask again smaller
myth: opus 5.5 got nerfed.
reality: the before/after tests going around show the same output. it just takes a few more prompts to get there.
so it's not dumber, it's more expensive. kinda worse honestly
built easyunzip.app because right click > extract all > pick a folder got old fast.
now i select the zips in explorer, press alt+e, done.
it's on the microsoft store now. $9.99 once, no subscription
quick tip if your claude code limit is draining faster this week:
don't type "continue" in a chat that's been idle for an hour. the cache has expired, so you pay to re-read the whole thing.
before you step away, ask for a 5 line summary. start a fresh chat with it when you're back
token counts are the new vanity metric.
t3 code: 36.5 trillion. gemini 4 argon: 25 trillion in 72 hours.
coding agents re-read the same repo every turn. the number i'd brag about is how few tokens a finished task took
easyunzip is live on the microsoft store.
the code wasn't the slow part. the passport scan was: failed, failed, passed on try 3. then the store rejected my first package as a "headless app".
one manifest fix later, approved overnight.
anyone else shipped a windows app through partner center?
easyunzp.app
claude code before 2.1.304: back from lunch, type "continue", watch a chunk of the 5-hour bar disappear.
after 2.1.304: it warns you first. resume anyway, or start fresh and let claude look up the old chat.
picking up where you left off is now the expensive option 💀
anthropic tuesday. every timeline says fable 5.5 drops today.
me refreshing the claude model picker:
myth: fable 5.5 leaked in a t3 code commit today.
reality: fable 5.1 got confused after calling opus 5.5 and named itself 5.5. theo says they don't even have it.
models don't know their own name. so don't trust "all tests pass" without running them