What does the science say (@does_science) header
What does the science say (@does_science) profile picture

What does the science say

@does_science

Exposing the rhetoricians using sophistical interpretations of science to advance a personal or political agenda

Joined June 2018
  • Tweets1K
  • Following99
  • Followers29
157Media
Photo by What does the science say (@does_science)Photo by What does the science say (@does_science)Photo by What does the science say (@does_science)Photo by What does the science say (@does_science)Photo by What does the science say (@does_science)Photo by What does the science say (@does_science)Photo by What does the science say (@does_science)Photo by What does the science say (@does_science)Photo by What does the science say (@does_science)Photo by What does the science say (@does_science)
Blocked harder than CO2 blocks infrared radiation.
Image from What does the science say (@does_science)
1
Surprisingly rational, well done.
Patrick Moore (@EcoSenseNow) profile picturePatrick Moore
@EcoSenseNow31 Dec 2018
You have postulated impossible wild fluctuations in atmospheric mass and claim they are caused by variations in Earth’s orbit and tilt, which have zero corroboration, upon which your entire “pressure-only” fabrication depends, and expect us to swallow it. Not on my watch.
2
Replying to @RoyPentland
@RoyPentland Change my mind!
Daily Wire (@realDailyWire) profile pictureDaily Wire
@realDailyWire24 Sep 2018
Image from Daily Wire (@realDailyWire)
1
Image from What does the science say (@does_science)
What gave my non-Americaness away?
This Post is from a suspended account. Learn more
1
1
What does the science say retweeted
icarus62 (@icarus62) profile picture
icarus62@icarus6210 Jul 2018
Replying to @Greenlandshelf
Yes we do, and that's exactly why our ~120ppm of CO2 is having such a large effect on global climate. If we'd started out at 4000ppm instead of 280ppm, the effect would have been hardly detectable.
Image from icarus62 (@icarus62)
1
5
Load more