The first launchpad for doxed devs.
Joined December 2024
- Tweets2.1K
- Following0
- Followers5.8K
- Likes25
Next: Robinhood Chain and Arc. Same rule on every chain.
Being doxed doesn't make a token safe. It makes the dev accountable. Watch the stream, ask questions, DYOR.
Go live or don't launch - doxpad.fun
Doxpad retweeted
League of Trenches and SOBOT are officially over, not because I stopped caring about them, but because both projects taught our team major lessons.
League of Trenches was built with heavy 3D assets. The game itself worked, but onboarding players smoothly through a browser was extremely difficult. Browsers often reduce performance to support weaker devices, and when a game contains hundreds of megabytes of detailed assets, the experience becomes laggy no matter how much work goes into optimization.
We released a downloadable desktop version, but the reality is that most crypto users do not want to download a heavy game. They expect to open a link and start playing immediately. A huge percentage of modern players are also mobile-first.
Without a fast and smooth browser experience, it is almost impossible to attract users at scale. That is one of the main reasons League of Trenches lost momentum. We learned from it.
SOBOT taught us a different lesson.
Robotics is still extremely early. Only three or four people were consistently training the robot each day. Around 95% of holders became focused only on price action, while very few wanted to actively participate in the actual training model.
The entire idea was for the community to train, improve, and promote the robot, not for everything to depend on me alone. That community behavior never developed in the way I imagined.
Sometimes an idea works exactly as planned. Sometimes it is simply too early for adoption.
Some of my attempts attract serious participation. Others teach me that the market is not ready yet.
Now I am fully focused on the next project, built directly from the lessons of League of Trenches and everything we experienced before it.
Voxie originally started as a version of Nemoverse. But Nemoverse was also a heavy 3D game and would have created the same onboarding problems as League of Trenches.
Because of that, we made the difficult decision to abandon that version and build a completely fresh game. Thousands of dollars spent developing Nemoverse were effectively thrown away, but that is part of building. Sometimes you must accept the loss and create something better.
Voxie will be a voxel-based game designed from day one for browsers and mobile apps.
It will be lightweight, smooth, accessible, and easy to start playing immediately.
Earning will also begin from day one, so we do not lose momentum while waiting to activate the core economy.
For the next two months, you will not hear another token ticker promoted through my personal brand or social accounts. Just like I did with Nemo, I will fully dedicate myself to one project.
The potential of this game is unlimited.
We already have:
A gaming Discord community with more than 500 members ready to join from day one.
A private supporters group with 27 members.
KOLs, larger accounts, and serious supporters prepared to begin talking about the project from launch.
League of Trenches was my first real attempt at launching a crypto game, and it taught me that crypto gamers behave very differently from traditional gamers.
Now I understand the gaps.
I understand the onboarding problem, the importance of browser performance, mobile accessibility, immediate earning, coordinated community support, and maintaining momentum from the first day.
I am ready to push one project seriously and consistently for the long term.
P.S. If you come into the comments acting impulsively and throwing insults, I genuinely do not care. You will be blocked, and I will continue building without you.
But if you understand how hard I am trying, follow the process, learn from every attempt with me, and watch what comes next.
I have been onchain for more than six years, and my journey has always moved like a roller coaster.
After the WakeUp launch last November, someone told me that nobody would ever follow me again. A few months later, I had a project reach a $1 million market cap and operated it for three full months.
This is crypto. This is Solana.
Not every attempt succeeds, but the people who follow my work long term understand that I always return stronger.
TIMING / score - 8.0
Competitiveness / score - 8
Few direct competitors. project offers strong, innovative features.
Market Conditions / score - 8
Launched in a stable bear market and sustained consistent development efforts.
UTILITY / score - 6.0
Benefits / score - 7
Meaningful benefits, such as enhanced staking rewards, voting rights in a DAO, or token-based discounts on popular services or platforms.
Tools & Product Quality / score - 5
Functional tools are available with moderate utility, though they may have usability or stability issues. limited adoption but potential for improvement.
TEAM / score - 6.0
Advisors / score - 6
The Pi Network project has advisors, but their reputation and influence are not exceptionally high. The project was founded by a group of Stanford PhDs, which adds some credibility, but the overall advisory team does not appear to be highly rated or well-known in the industry. This places the project in the medium level of advisory quality.
Experience / score - 8
The team demonstrates considerable Web2 experience, including leadership roles, combined with substantial involvement in Web3. This score shows a high level of expertise, suggesting a skilled team with relevant industry knowledge.
Fundraising / score - 10
Fundraising over $100 million - Top-tier funding level, showing major investor trust. The project has abundant resources for continuous innovation, large-scale adoption efforts, and resilience against market fluctuations, positioning it as a leading contender in the space.
Transparency / score - 2
Some basic information about the team is available, but details are minimal or vague. This indicates a low level of transparency, often failing to build substantial trust with the community.
Activity and Reliability / score - 4
The Pi Network team appears to be active, with a significant user base and community engagement. However, there is limited information available about the team's specific activities, qualifications, and track record in the crypto space, which prevents a higher rating. The team's involvement in organizing community events and developer grants suggests some level of commitment, but more transparency about their expertise and past projects would be beneficial for a higher score.
ROADMAP / score - 7.3
Achievements / score - 8
Success in seven metrics demonstrates an advanced level of achievement. The project is positioned with competitive strengths, solid funding, and an integrated ecosystem, establishing a robust market presence.
Future Plans / score - 6
Clear and realistic future plans with specific goals and timelines, showing some ambition to improve and adapt. progress is trackable.
On-Time Delivery / score - 8
Most milestones are met on or near the target date, with proactive communication about timelines. consistent delivery track record.
UTILITY / score - 7.0
Benefits / score - 8
Significant, multi-faceted benefits are provided, such as exclusive content, competitive staking/APR rates, or access to high-value tools and resources.
Tools & Product Quality / score - 6
Reliable tools/products with decent utility. some unique features or user-friendly design elements, showing consistent usage or moderate community engagement.
TEAM / score - 7.4
Advisors / score - 8
The MANTRA OM token project has advisors, as indicated by the mention of "Team & Advisors" in the tokenomics distribution, which accounts for 17.5% of the total supply. This suggests that the project has some level of professional guidance, but the specific reputation and expertise of these advisors are not detailed. Therefore, it can be inferred that the project has advisors, but their reputation and influence are not highlighted as exceptionally high.
Experience / score - 8
The team demonstrates considerable Web2 experience, including leadership roles, combined with substantial involvement in Web3. This score shows a high level of expertise, suggesting a skilled team with relevant industry knowledge.
Fundraising / score - 5
Fundraising from $10 to $20 million - A reasonable level of funding suggests decent development potential and market reach, though still limited in comparison to top projects with substantial backing.
Transparency / score - 8
The team’s transparency is very high, with detailed information about each member’s experience, qualifications, and contributions to the project. This level supports strong community trust and confidence in the team.
Activity and Reliability / score - 8
The MANTRA OM token team appears to be active and reliable, with a clear vision and strategy as evident from their token distribution plans and community engagement. They have a robust community presence, transparent communication, and are endorsed by respected advisors, which indicates a high level of trust and credibility.
TEAM / score - 7.0
Advisors / score - 7
The Sonic (prev. FTM) S token project has advisors, but the information provided does not specify their reputation or expertise in detail. While it mentions that the project has a visible profile of the project founders and backers, it does not provide specific information about the advisors' backgrounds or reputations, suggesting an average level of advisory involvement.
Experience / score - 8
The team demonstrates considerable Web2 experience, including leadership roles, combined with substantial involvement in Web3. This score shows a high level of expertise, suggesting a skilled team with relevant industry knowledge.
Fundraising / score - 8
Fundraising from $50 to $75 million - With substantial financial backing, the project is well-positioned for significant growth, with the ability to expand its team, marketing, and features to gain competitive advantage.
Transparency / score - 6
A fair level of transparency is provided, with most team members visible and a mix of credible roles and backgrounds shared. This builds moderate trust with the community, although further verification might be helpful.
Activity and Reliability / score - 6
The Sonic (previously FTM) token team appears to be moderately active, with some evidence of community engagement and participation in relevant events. However, there is no extensive information available about their recent activities or significant contributions that would elevate them to a high level of reliability and activity. They seem to be maintaining a steady presence but lack the high level of visibility and recommendation from experienced individuals that would justify a higher score.
TEAM / score - 7.0
Advisors / score - 7
The Berachain BERA token project has advisors, but they are not highly rated companies or individuals. The project mentions that 16.8% of the tokens are allocated to advisors and members of Big Bera Labs, indicating that there are experienced individuals involved, but their reputation and influence are not exceptionally high. This places the project at a medium level in terms of advisor quality.
Experience / score - 8
The team demonstrates considerable Web2 experience, including leadership roles, combined with substantial involvement in Web3. This score shows a high level of expertise, suggesting a skilled team with relevant industry knowledge.
Fundraising / score - 10
Fundraising over $100 million - Top-tier funding level, showing major investor trust. The project has abundant resources for continuous innovation, large-scale adoption efforts, and resilience against market fluctuations, positioning it as a leading contender in the space.
Transparency / score - 4
At this level, the team’s information is available but lacks depth. Some roles and general backgrounds may be shared, yet critical details are missing, resulting in moderate risk for transparency concerns.
Activity and Reliability / score - 6
The Berachain BERA token team shows moderate activity and reliability. They have a clear tokenomics strategy, a well-defined Proof-of-Liquidity consensus mechanism, and a structured approach to governance and staking. However, the recent price drop and lack of detailed information on long-term development plans suggest that while they are active, their reliability and public trust could be improved with more transparent and consistent actions.
TIMING / score - 7.5
Competitiveness / score - 8
Few direct competitors. project offers strong, innovative features.
Market Conditions / score - 7
Launched during the transition from bear to bull market with solid planning and adaptability.
TEAM / score - 7.0
Advisors / score - 8
The Solana SOL token project likely has highly rated companies and individuals as advisors, given the complexity and scope of token creation on the Solana blockchain. Companies like TokenMinds, Attic Labs, and SoluLab, which specialize in Solana development, are likely involved in advising on the project, contributing to its high rating.
Experience / score - 8
The team demonstrates considerable Web2 experience, including leadership roles, combined with substantial involvement in Web3. This score shows a high level of expertise, suggesting a skilled team with relevant industry knowledge.
Fundraising / score - 10
Fundraising over $100 million - Top-tier funding level, showing major investor trust. The project has abundant resources for continuous innovation, large-scale adoption efforts, and resilience against market fluctuations, positioning it as a leading contender in the space.
Transparency / score - 2
Some basic information about the team is available, but details are minimal or vague. This indicates a low level of transparency, often failing to build substantial trust with the community.
Activity and Reliability / score - 7
The Solana SOL token team is active and reliable, with a strong background in software engineering and entrepreneurship. The team has a deep understanding of blockchain challenges and has released numerous open-source libraries and tools, indicating a high level of activity and reliability. However, there are some concerns about decentralization due to the consensus model, which slightly lowers the overall assessment.