🚨 TRUMP ADMINISTRATION DELIVERS $16.4 MILLION FOR RURAL MARYLAND HEALTHCARE — ANDY HARRIS WAS THE ONLY MEMBER OF THE STATE’S CONGRESSIONAL DELEGATION TO VOTE FOR THE FUNDING WASHINGTON, DC — More than $16 million in federal funding is headed to rural Maryland to recruit doctors, retain nurses and expand healthcare training programs. Republican Congressman Andy Harris is highlighting a notable political distinction: He was the only member of Maryland’s congressional delegation to support the 2025 legislation that created the program. ▪️ $16.4 MILLION AWARDED: Maryland announced grants to 39 organizations supporting healthcare workforce development across 18 designated rural regions. ▪️ HARRIS CAST THE ONLY YES: Harris supported the Republican-backed legislation establishing the $50 billion national Rural Health Transformation Program. Maryland’s Democratic congressional delegation opposed the broader bill. ▪️ NURSES AND PHYSICIANS: Funding supports recruitment and retention of registered nurses, physicians, dentists and physician assistants in underserved communities. ▪️ TRAINING AND APPRENTICESHIPS: Programs will provide paid training opportunities, professional certifications and assistance with education-related expenses. ▪️ $168 MILLION FOR MARYLAND: The state previously received approximately $168.2 million in first-year federal rural healthcare funding. The $16.4 million represents one allocation within that larger award. ▪️ MOORE ADMINISTRATION PARTICIPATION: Gov. Wes Moore announced the workforce grants October 14, emphasizing the need to improve rural healthcare access. The money originates from the federal program authorized by legislation he did not control. The distinction matters: Maryland’s state agencies administer the grants, while Harris supported the congressional legislation that made the funding possible. Will Maryland’s congressional Democrats acknowledge the rural healthcare investments authorized by legislation they opposed? And will state officials publish measurable results showing how many new healthcare professionals actually begin serving rural communities?

🚨 498 MAINE ABSENTEE BALLOT ENVELOPES FOUND AT SOROS-LINKED NONPROFIT’S MARYLAND ADDRESS — INVESTIGATION CLOSED WITHOUT EXPLANATION CAMBRIDGE, MD — Newly released Maine investigative records reveal that a shipment of 500 blank absentee ballot return envelopes intended for state election officials was instead delivered to the Maryland address of the Center for Civic Design, an election-focused nonprofit with reported Soros-network funding connections. Investigators recovered 498 envelopes but never established why the shipment was redirected. The case was closed in spring 2026. ▪️ 500 ENVELOPES MISSING: On September 10, 2025, Maine’s printing contractor shipped 62 boxes containing 500 envelopes each. State officials received 61 boxes. The missing shipment eventually surfaced in Cambridge, Maryland. ▪️ TWO STILL UNACCOUNTED FOR: The nonprofit notified Maine officials October 3 that it had received the package. Its employee estimated approximately 100 envelopes, but investigators counted 498. The discrepancy and two missing envelopes remain unexplained. ▪️ UNEXPLAINED SHIPPING LABEL: The original printer denied having any business relationship with the nonprofit. Investigators discovered that UPS had apparently relabeled the package through its Massachusetts overgoods operation. ▪️ NO SUBPOENA ISSUED: UPS requested a subpoena before releasing additional tracking information. Maine Attorney General Aaron Frey’s office determined there was insufficient legal justification to issue one. ▪️ POLITICAL CONNECTIONS: The Center for Civic Design has documented communications with Maine election officials and reported connections to progressive philanthropic networks. No evidence establishes that the organization deliberately redirected the shipment or used the envelopes improperly. ▪️ INVESTIGATION CLOSED: Secretary of State Shenna Bellows initially promised answers, but investigative records released in October 2026 show officials closed the case without determining how the envelopes reached Maryland. The material consisted of blank return envelopes, not completed ballots. No election fraud has been established. But the chain-of-custody failure deserves a complete explanation. Who authorized the shipping-label change, where are the remaining two envelopes, and why was the investigation closed before officials established how election materials ended up at an unrelated Maryland nonprofit?