Celeste is dead on. This is a huge spit in the face of everyone who waited in line, and did what they were supposed to do. Now, illegals are getting rewarded, when they’ve already proven they won’t follow the law, by entering in the country illegally.
No Amnesty.
I’m tired of illegal immigration and my tax dollars going to people who will never lift a finger a day in their lives or will work for basically zero pay. My parents are immigrants who came in legally decades ago, why should others skip the line AND I have to foot the bill?
As I mentioned on stream last night, my state is also becoming a home for third world Islamists who will absolutely drain and backstab us eventually. Please pray our leaders stop selling us out and CALL THE PEOPLE REPRESENTING US TO STOP THIS!!
59
Dukes708 retweeted
Using a protective order to remove someone's right to use a firearm is some of the most criminal shit our government does.
The government is not allowed to remove you of life, liberty, or property without due process but protective orders allow someone to say "I'm scared" with no evidence of wrong doing and you get treated essentially worse than a felon when it comes to gun rights.
To fully explain how bad this is, in order to convict someone in criminal court of a crime, you need to be 95%+ sure they did it. For a protective order, you need zero evidence and a person's word alone is enough. So basically 25% sure that the person is guilty of the accusation which makes the standard of proof far less than civil court (51%).
🚨BREAKING NEWS🚨
Texas Democrats are filing a FLOOD of proposed bills that would TAKE AWAY gun rights for Americans.
Here's what's been filed so far:
HB 218 (Johnson): would create extreme-risk protective orders, including temporary orders issued without notice. A family or household member or a peace officer could apply if they allege the person has a serious mental illness and poses an immediate danger because of access to firearms. The person would have to turn over their guns within 24 hours; a full order would last up to a year and could be renewed. Possessing a gun in violation would be a Class A misdemeanor.
HB 173 (Moody): would make it a state jail felony to transfer a semiautomatic rifle that takes a detachable magazine and is larger than .22 caliber to anyone under 21, with exceptions for peace officers, current or honorably discharged military, and some temporary loans at a range or hunt.
HB 576 (Lalani): would bar registered sex offenders from buying a firearm, but only for registration based on an offense committed on or after Sept. 1, 2027.
HB 103 (Martinez): would expand the state crime of reckless discharge of a firearm so it also covers counties of 500,000 or more people, not just cities of 100,000 or more.
SB 80 (Zaffirini): would prohibit certain transfers, purchases, and possession of assault weapons and would create criminal offenses.
HB 606 (Lalani): would prohibit transferring firearms to, or the purchase or possession of firearms by, people under 21, and would create a criminal offense.
HB 610 (Lalani): would prohibit transferring firearms to certain recipients under 21.
HB 857 (Anchía): would prohibit transferring certain semiautomatic rifles to certain recipients under 21, and would create a criminal offense and increase a penalty.
HB 771 (Sethi): would prohibit transferring certain semiautomatic rifles to certain recipients, and would create a criminal offense and increase a penalty.
HB 806 (Reynolds): would prohibit transferring semiautomatic rifles to certain recipients and would increase a criminal penalty.
HB 613 (Lalani): would require a national instant criminal background check on private firearm transfers and would create a criminal offense.
HB 612 (Lalani): would prohibit a sex offender from possessing a firearm. (prob the only reasonable one)
HB 609 (Lalani): would increase the criminal penalty for making a firearm accessible to a child.
HB 658 (Moody): would change the prosecution and punishment of making a firearm accessible to a child and would increase a criminal penalty.
HB 618 (Moody): would restrict transferring firearm magazines to people who are prohibited from possessing the type of firearm the magazine is made for, and would create a criminal offense.
HB 659 (Moody): would require licensed firearms dealers to report certain sales or transfers of multiple firearms or magazines to law enforcement, and would create a criminal offense.
HB 660 (Moody): would require certain people already prohibited from owning or possessing a firearm to dispose of firearms they own, possess, or control.
HB 712 (Gámez): would address a city or county's authority to regulate or prohibit carrying a firearm in certain libraries.
HB 776 (Sethi): would address expulsion-related offenses involving possessing, carrying, exhibiting, or using a firearm on or within 1,000 feet of school property.
HB 859 (Anchía): would increase the criminal penalty for discharging a firearm in certain municipalities.
