scaled (@ecomdiddy) header
scaled (@ecomdiddy) profile picture

8 figures in ecom at 20 | Dm me “Mentor” for 1-1

Joined October 2025
Photo by scaled (@ecomdiddy)Photo by scaled (@ecomdiddy)Photo by scaled (@ecomdiddy)Photo by scaled (@ecomdiddy)Photo by scaled (@ecomdiddy)Photo by scaled (@ecomdiddy)Photo by scaled (@ecomdiddy)Photo by scaled (@ecomdiddy)Photo by scaled (@ecomdiddy)Photo by scaled (@ecomdiddy)
your product isn't losing to better products it's losing to better offers and most people don't even realise it here's what I mean you can have the best ads in the world but if someone lands on your page and your offer is just "buy one for $39.99 + free shipping" you've already lost free shipping isn't an offer. everybody does that. that's just expected now the brands that are actually printing are making saying no feel stupid a 90 day supply bundled with a free bonus product. subscribe and save that genuinely saves them money. a guarantee so strong it removes every reason not to buy. now that's an offer but here's where most people really fumble they send all their traffic to one product page and hope for the best wrong if your ad is about back pain, that click needs to land on a page that ONLY talks about back pain. not your homepage. not your full collection. a page that feels like the exact same conversation your ad started the click and the landing page need to feel like one experience. the moment there's a disconnect you lose them and then there's the part nobody wants to hear if your aov is under $50 you are fighting a losing battle. cpms are going up every year. the brands winning right now aren't getting cheaper traffic they're making every single visitor worth more bundles. subscribe and save. post purchase upsells. this isn't optional anymore this is survival stop trying to compete on product. compete on everything around the product that's where the real margin lives
4
28
1,489
What you guys think of the fit? Trick or treating but instead of candy I'm collecting MRR 🎃
5
2
114
4,612
Your ad is eating budget but not printing sales? that's not a dead ad. that's an ad with one thing wrong if Meta keeps spending on it something already hit. your job is finding the leak first place I look: who's actually clicking? if your hook is too vague you attract window shoppers. people who love the content but were never pulling out their card tighten up who you're talking to in the first 3 seconds. name the person, name the problem. keep the energy that made it work but filter out the tourists I've had ads doing insane CTR that sold nothing because the creative was entertaining the wrong crowd. soon as we narrowed the hook, same ad, completely different results second place I look: does the page finish the job? the ad got the click. that parts done. if they're bouncing after that your page is the problem not the ad biggest mistake I see is the ad selling one angle and the page saying something completely different your ad is about saving time? your page better not open with "premium organic ingredients" every winning angle deserves its own page. not just one PDP for everything. the brands doing real numbers all figured this out early congruent landing pages aren't a nice to have. they're the difference between an ad that spends and an ad that scales before you kill that ad, check what's around it. the winner might already be there you just haven't connected the pieces yet
2
3
28
1,490
The biggest problem with running subscriptions isn't getting customers. it's keeping them Most people don't cancel. they just dispute the charge in their bank and you wake up to a chargeback you didn't even see coming this intercepts that before it happens. if you're doing MRR you need this
Your subscribers can now skip a delivery from their banking app. That gives you a chance to keep them before a renewal dispute becomes a chargeback. When a customer goes to their banking app to dispute a charge, Disputely Resolve intercepts it. Instead of a chargeback, they get a 1-tap option to just skip their next @LoopEngine delivery. The customer keeps their routine, and you keep the revenue
2
2
20
1,813
The reason most ecom stores fail isn't the product It's the feedback loop You launch. You wait a week. You change nothing. You panic. You switch products Winners launch. Read the data in 48 hours. Cut what's not working. Double down on what is. Repeat Speed of iteration is the only real advantage in this game
7
42
2,190
$215k in a day My first ever day in ecom I did $85 That was 2 years ago This game will change your life if you don’t quit
25
5
1
335
13,791
Every ad I run gets broken down. winner or loser. I don't care about ROAS until I understand WHY where did they drop off. was it the hook. was it the proof. did the ad do its job but the PDP killed the sale. would it print on a different sub-avatar most brands skip this. they kill ads that had all the right signals just because the surface numbers looked bad that feedback loop is the difference between guessing and scaling and AI has blown the whole thing wide open AI songs, pixar style ads, formats that didn't even exist 6 months ago. stuff that stops the scroll before your hook even needs to work take one winning angle, run it through 20 different formats and personas in a day. by tomorrow you know exactly what prints and why the brands still waiting a week for one piece of content are already behind They just don't know it yet
13
43
2,170
An 18 year old with no experience just did $16k in a single day selling supplements no funding. no connections. no team. just a phone and a willingness to shut up and listen 3 months ago he was burning money running ads with no structure, no offer strategy, no backend I took him on as a 1-1 student and we rebuilt everything from zero today he’s printing $16k days and BFCM hasn’t even started yet the craziest part? he almost quit before we started working together said he “wasn’t sure supplements was the right move” now he’s sitting on a subscription machine that’s only getting stronger every month guys with way more money and way more experience can’t figure this out he figured it out at 18 the difference was never talent. it was never money it was having someone who’s already done it strip away all the noise and show him exactly what to do stop overthinking it. the game is simple when you have the right person next to you
3
4
92
3,901
Most people testing creative only test hooks and wonder why nothing moves after the first few wins. Hook, angle, and mechanism are three different things. Almost nobody separates them. Hook is how you stop the scroll. The first 3 seconds. Angle is the emotional reason someone cares. Fear of aging, social proof, convenience, status. Mechanism is the actual "why it works." The science, the process, the specific reason this product solves it. You can run 20 hooks on the same angle and same mechanism and just be testing editing style, not actually learning anything new about your customer. Here's the breakdown that matters: New hook, same angle, same mechanism = you're testing creative execution Same hook, new angle, same mechanism = you're testing what your customer actually cares about Same hook, same angle, new mechanism = you're testing whether they believe the product works Most accounts plateau because they're stuck doing the first one on repeat. New face, new b-roll, same angle, same mechanism, same ceiling. The accounts that keep scaling are testing all three independently so they know exactly which lever moved the number, instead of guessing why an ad died. Few.
7
1
24
1,299
$200k MRR in 1 month on a brand new supp brand. not because of the product. because of the system behind it. most brands spend a month hunting for one winning angle. we assumed we didn’t know which would win and went wide instead ran native and AI videos across a stack of angles, not just hook variations on one offer for each angle, we went into the mechanisms, built out the different reasons why the product actually works and tested those separately too built a PDP for every mechanism, matched word for word to the ad so there’s no funnel congruency gap between click and landing page built a workflow using AI to automate the video creative and PDPs, so testing a new mechanism took hours instead of weeks set hard kill criteria on CTR and CPA, dead concepts got cut within 48 hours, no emotional attachment to a losing ad budget went straight into the angles and mechanisms actually printing while most competitors were still waiting on their first custom lander high testing volume beats a “gut feel” every time. the data picks the winner, not you $1M MRR real soon
13
6
136
6,665
Hired too late for years and it capped everything kept doing tasks that didn't need me anymore because "nobody does it like me" that mentality is the single biggest ceiling in ecom right now, not ad spend, not creative, not the algorithm here’s the test i run on every op now if the task only needs time and attention, it's not mine anymore if it needs judgment on offer, positioning, or where the brand goes next, that stays with me everyone obsessed with doing more. the operators actually scaling are obsessed with doing less, better most people will read this and agree almost none of them will actually hand off the task they're avoiding today
1
1
17
1,212
Your winning ad has an expiration date and you don't know what it is they die because people treat one good ad like the finish line it hits, cpa drops, you scale it for 3 weeks then it slows and the instinct is "find a new hook" wrong move. the hook was never the problem it worked because it found one specific type of person already looking for what you sell that pocket is finite. you don't run out of budget, you run out of them here's what most people skip the second an ad is performing, break it down before you touch anything else what's the hook, word for word
 what emotion is it hitting 
what's the proof it leans on what awareness level is it at
 the one sentence a friend would use to describe it that breakdown is your blueprint, not the ad itself now you build iterations with purpose. new hook same emotion. same hook different proof. same angle, different face you're not copying the ad, you're copying the reason it worked most people scale one ad til it dies, study nothing, then scramble the ones printing $100k days study the winner before they chase the next one
1
1
22
1,315
Haven't posted in a minute $210k yesterday. You're welcome
8
2
155
5,077
most stores lose the sale in the first 5 seconds of the landing page here’s how to fix it tonight take the exact hook from your best performing ad and make it the headline on your lander same words. same emotion. same promise. your customer clicked because that hook spoke to them the second they land on a page that says something different that trust is broken match the headline to the hook match the subtext to the pain match the CTA to the desire do that one thing and your CVR will move takes 20 minutes most people never do it
6
1
53
4,213
$145k and this was a bad day that’s the goal make your worst days look like someone else’s best month
12
2
159
6,110
here’s something that took me way too long to figure out your best performing creative isn’t going to come from a brief it’s not going to come from a creative agency it’s not even going to come from your best UGC creator it’s already written in your 1 star reviews in your support tickets in the DMs from people who almost bought but didn’t that’s where the real objection lives that’s the exact language your customer uses when they talk about your product to themselves most brands write ad copy from the inside out here’s the product, here’s the features, here’s why it’s good the ones doing real numbers write from the outside in here’s the fear, here’s the frustration, here’s why everything else failed them your customer doesn’t want your product they want the version of their life after your product find that in your reviews write the hook in their exact words watch your CTR do something you’ve never seen before
4
1
39
2,539
Was told to go get a degree Yesterday my brand did $107k Best decision I ever made was ignoring that advice
11
6
163
6,058
here’s why your ads die at scale and nobody talks about it when you’re spending $500/day your winning ad works because it found the exact pocket of people who were always going to buy those people are gone in 2 weeks what’s left is everyone else and your ad wasn’t built for them changing the budget doesn’t fix this changing the targeting doesn’t fix this you need a completely different emotional entry point for the same product different fear. different desire. different version of the same person the stores doing $100k days aren’t scaling one winner they’re running 6 simultaneous reasons why someone would buy most people never get here because they think creative testing means changing a headline it doesn’t it means finding every possible human reason someone would hand over money for what you’re selling that’s the job
8
32
2,308
Every time our ads stopped converting we did this before touching a single campaign Is the bundle presenting higher value options as the default Or is single unit still the path of least resistance Is the urgency mechanism real Or just a countdown timer nobody believes Would a completely cold stranger buy this without needing to be convinced Is the value framing clear enough that the price feels like a no brainer 9 times out of 10 when we fix these the ads start converting again without touching a single campaign The ad account didn't break The offer just got exposed at scale.
2
1
17
2,340