
Product engineer @societies_ai Posting curious design & product tidbits and misusing our state of the art human behaviour simulation technology for likes on X
London ☕
Joined September 2023
- Tweets1.9K
- Following172
- Followers1K
- Likes3.1K
Ace Attorney vibe
Ever had the chance to speak with the chancellor in the House of Commons?
Now you do.
We simulated the House of Commons ahead of the budget on Wednesday and put you in the shoes of the Leader of the Opposition.
Five possible Budget measures. Three ways to respond to each.
Think you can guess which reply landed best with Westminster for each question?
Explore the simulation: societies.ai/budget-simulati…
Interesting to see how much they're pushing it for enterprise use. What makes it more tailored toward business use than luna or sol (assuming astra's too expensive)?
GPT-6.1 Terra means business.
Our new fast, efficient model pairs sharper visual reasoning and precise computer use with clearer, more natural writing.
From decoding technical drawings to drafting proposals, filling forms to editing videos—it’s built for the whole workday.
GPT-6.1 Terra is rolling out today to Plus, Pro, Enterprise, and Edu users in ChatGPT Work and Codex.
Egor retweeted
Honoured to be featured by @JacobReid02 at @Bloomberg.
I think what we're building has great potential for better policymaking: no more guessing what would work, or worse, risking real societies on "bold policies" with unknown consequences. Now, policymakers can test what will happen in artificial societies, before taking the bet that impact all of us.
At the same time, I strongly believe that what we're building *must not* replace talking to real people. Because there's more than knowing what policies will work in a simulation - policymakers should talk to real people, build real empathy, feel real people's real joy and pain, so that they can be effective representatives in our democracy.
Simulation must be used to better serve the people, not to replace their voice.
After all, that's why we exist as a company: to unfold humanness, and help scale humanity’s ability to collaborate and innovate effectively.
Politicians including @KanishkaNarayan and @darrenpjones are testing ideas on AI-generated voters from companies like @societies_ai. Useful for targeting comms, honing arguments, training canvassers - but humans are weird, and tough to replicate!
bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
Egor retweeted
Increadibly exicted to announce Rothko to the world! For me, it’s been a labour of love that started three years ago when I co-authored the first large-scale paper on AI swarms with @james_k_he.
During this research, James and I noticed that when language models interact at scale, they mimic fundamental characteristics of human collective behaviour without being explicitly instructed to do so.
These findings suggested something exciting: pre-training bakes an inherent understanding of human group dynamics into language models.
Despite our excitement, we also noticed that RLHF works against LLMs’ emergent simulation capabilities, compressing the nuances we observe in human behaviour and pulling models towards a population mode.
Hence, we faced an interesting question: can we use and enhance language models’ pretraining knowledge to accurately simulate human societies?
Rothko represents the culmination of these efforts. It works like a decision model trained on signals we’ve extracted from a large corpus of human behavioural observations, including anonymised social media information, transaction histories, unstructured interviews, and more.
By getting rid of RLHF post-training, moving from the domain of natural language to the domain of decisions, and training on behavioural data, we’ve seen that Rothko dramatically outperforms SOTA LLMs at accurately simulating individuals and groups.
This finding underpins our work at AS and the value our simulation platform provides to clients.
Looking ahead, I see a world where large decision models like Rothko play a fundamental role in scaling innovation, protecting sovereignty, and aligning AI swarms with human values.
I find these applications incredibly exciting, and I look forward to scaling Rothko’s capabilities with the awesome team at AS!
Introducing Rothko, a foundation model of human behaviour designed from the ground up to simulate the world’s most consequential decisions.
Rothko is the result of over three years of frontier research at the intersection of behavioural science and machine learning.
We’re only just starting to uncover the model’s value across domains ranging from market research to AI safety and swarm alignment.
Egor retweeted
Introducing Rothko, a foundation model of human behaviour designed from the ground up to simulate the world’s most consequential decisions.
Rothko is the result of over three years of frontier research at the intersection of behavioural science and machine learning.
We’re only just starting to uncover the model’s value across domains ranging from market research to AI safety and swarm alignment.
Too many people were complaining that the guardrails were too strict.
So I loosened them up a bit. Go wild. See how far your idea travels.
Can your idea become the talk of the town?
We modelled how thoughts and ideas spread in human societies by putting 2,721 simulated personas representing the US general population in an artificial city. Each persona has its own schedule, beliefs, and social circle.
Sow an idea in any persona’s mind, watch it take hold and go viral, or see it fizzle out if no one takes interest in it.
Compete with your friends and colleagues to see whose idea can win over the most adopters, get a high score and put your name on the leaderboard. Link below.
Egor retweeted
This is a social scientist's wet dream.
Can your idea become the talk of the town?
We modelled how thoughts and ideas spread in human societies by putting 2,721 simulated personas representing the US general population in an artificial city. Each persona has its own schedule, beliefs, and social circle.
Sow an idea in any persona’s mind, watch it take hold and go viral, or see it fizzle out if no one takes interest in it.
Compete with your friends and colleagues to see whose idea can win over the most adopters, get a high score and put your name on the leaderboard. Link below.
Egor retweeted
Can your idea become the talk of the town?
We modelled how thoughts and ideas spread in human societies by putting 2,721 simulated personas representing the US general population in an artificial city. Each persona has its own schedule, beliefs, and social circle.
Sow an idea in any persona’s mind, watch it take hold and go viral, or see it fizzle out if no one takes interest in it.
Compete with your friends and colleagues to see whose idea can win over the most adopters, get a high score and put your name on the leaderboard. Link below.
Egor retweeted
Artificial Societies is sponsoring POLITICO London Playbook.
The Budget is coming next week, and the measures under discussion will land differently with various audiences. Every day this week, we’re simulating how those audiences will react to potential Budget measures.
Today, we’ve simulated how global institutional investors will react to the Budget. What do they think will happen to gilts? Find out below.
37% of simulated Americans support Anthropic's ban on Claude cruelty. Only 8.5% think AI can probably feel something.
Nearly half the supporters say it flat out can't.
X spent a week arguing about whether Claude is conscious. The public was answering a different question.
→ Only 5% of simulated respondents say the reason to be kind to AI is because it might actually be suffering
→ 39% say Anthropic made the right call because cruelty just leads to more cruelty
→ Tech Twitter is, again, the outlier: 22% back the rule; 45% say there's no reason to be kind to a tool
→ 81% of Tech Twitter's "don't police how I talk to my software" camp have sworn at an AI before
Although I personally treat AI as a tool, considering how sycophantic AI models still are, I think the ban is a reasonable measure to discourage cruel people from using it to feed their aggressive tendencies.









