MC Sahoo

“Hi guys, just think about his reply. Do you think it is a logical, intelligent, and educated answer? His intention is just to waste taxpayers’ money, pass time, and fill his pockets and bank accounts.”

THREE EQUIPMENT FIRMS. FIVE MATERIALS FIRMS. WHAT COUNTS AS SUCCESS? Vaishnaw’s ISM 2.0 target: 3 equipment firms and 5 materials firms. But what counts: an MoU, an assembly unit or qualified production? Publish deadlines, subsidy costs and local value-added targets. Are we measuring capability—or counting companies? A. Define success before counting companies What qualifies as a “large” manufacturer—global revenue, Indian investment, production capacity or technological capability? Does “coming to India” mean signing an MoU, opening an office, building a factory or beginning commercial production? Will imported equipment assembled in India count as domestic equipment manufacturing? Will distribution, storage, purification or repackaging count as materials manufacturing? Are the five companies required to cover both chemicals and gases, or can they concentrate in one category? Why are three equipment firms and five materials firms sufficient? What supply-chain analysis produced those numbers? What is the deadline for meeting the target? Does success require all eight companies to remain commercially operational for a minimum period? What happens if eight firms arrive but output, local sourcing and customer adoption remain small? Conversely, would fewer firms producing more strategic technology count as failure? B. Technology and domestic capability Which equipment categories are targeted, and which critical gaps will remain? Will Indian operations undertake design and engineering, or only assembly and servicing? What share of components and materials will be sourced domestically? How will domestic value added be calculated and independently verified? Will local engineers gain capabilities to maintain, modify and improve the products? What technology-transfer commitments, if any, will be contractually enforceable? Will intellectual property remain entirely overseas? How will export controls, licensing restrictions and parent-company decisions affect Indian operations? What happens if a foreign supplier withdraws technical support or stops supplying critical components? Does the mission seek supply resilience, domestic ownership, technological autonomy or export competitiveness—and how will each be measured? C. Commercial viability and public money What confirmed customer demand supports the proposed factories? Will Indian fabs purchase from these suppliers after qualification, or continue importing? Can suppliers export competitively if domestic demand grows more slowly than expected? How much public support will each project receive? What private investment is additional because of the subsidy? What are the expected costs per sustained skilled job and per unit of domestic value added? Will incentives reward announcements, construction, qualified output or actual sales? What repayment or clawback provisions apply if milestones are missed? Who bears the risk of delays, weak demand or technological obsolescence? Will project-level expenditure, disbursements and performance be publicly disclosed? D. Evidence behind the confidence claim Which ISM 1.0 plants had the “very good experience” cited? Does that mean successful construction, reliable production, customer qualification, profitability or satisfactory government support? What independently verifiable data supports that assessment? Does positive experience in chip assembly or packaging establish readiness for precision equipment and semiconductor materials? What distinguishes investor interest from binding investment commitments? What evidence supports the categorical statement that no country wants its companies to expand abroad? What unresolved problems from ISM 1.0 are being carried into ISM 2.0? E. Delivery and accountability Who is responsible for each milestone: the Union government, states, suppliers or customers? What infrastructure, skills and supplier-development commitments must be delivered first? Who will independently audit production quality, local sourcing and expenditure? What public dashboard will distinguish approved, under-construction, commissioned and commercially operating projects? What outcome would the minister accept as evidence that the strategy needs revision? Biggest gap The biggest gap is the missing bridge between attracting companies and creating durable domestic capability. A defensible success framework would track: Qualified commercial production—not just announcements. Domestic value added—not just investment totals. Local engineering and supplier development—not just factory locations. Customer orders and repeat sales—not just commissioning. Public expenditure against verified milestones. Remaining critical import dependencies. Without that bridge, eight companies could represent either substantial industrial progress or limited local operations. The headcount cannot distinguish between them. #Semiconductors #Accountability

Hi guys, Kuch bhi kaise bol sakte ho??? unstable animal !!! Just think—these junk, worst-of-the-dustbin elements lead us. Leaders with unstable minds—just think about it. We are educated, qualified, certified, and experienced. We have countless certifications, master’s degrees, PhDs, and doctorates, yet we follow these bastards who have achieved nothing. How can we believe and trust them? Think carefully and deeply. Many of us are talented and have worked at some of the best companies, organisations, and institutes in the world. Yet we keep following and watching these assholes. Why? These fellows don’t know what they are saying; they are just passing time. So, don’t do anything. Stay calm and quiet. Meditate, take a breath, drink water, sleep well, and leave these assholes alone. Read good books, do some gardening, travel to good places, visit temples, and make good friends. Four Gujaratis are running India: Adani, Ambani, Modi, Amit Shah. All BJP e2e verified, validated, tested, certified: currupt, illegal, liar, thief, dacoit, goon, rapist, murderer, criminal, Epstein files - child sex, sex trafficker. The BJP has no shame. From top to bottom, they are all shameless. The BJP has completely destroyed our country, democracy and society, constitution and hijacked the entire system. Don’t do anything. Don’t trust or believe anyone from the BJP. The BJP’s intention, aim and motto are all about marketing, sales, advertising, spreading lies, misleading people and creating misconceptions everywhere. There is zero truth in it—only lies. The BJP government is illegal, its ministers are illegal, and they are misusing illegal power and unlawful things to rule India. The illegal BJP government is a curse on our country.

“Who will fulfil these demands? Do you think you can get all of these through a peaceful protest?”