He/Him. @fct_pt post-doc @ULisboa_ | past: @UniofOxford | phil mind & cog sci | belief, evidence-resistance, delusional cognition | Dog dad to Alki 🐕🦺
Lisbon, Portugal
Joined July 2016
- Tweets507
- Following832
- Followers622
- Likes1.2K
Pinned Tweet
Why are delusions adopted rather than something more plausible, or rather than nothing at all? Where do they come from?
I address these questions in a new paper with @PhilCorlett1, just out in @AustralJPhilos. You can check it out below (open access):
doi.org/10.1080/00048402.202…
Very excited to share that my paper 'Epistemic Standards and Minimally Responsive Beliefs' has found a great home at Philosophy and Phenomenological Research.
If you'd like to read a preprint of it, it's available here:
philpapers.org/rec/BONESA-2
2
277
Federico Bongiorno retweeted
Rest in peace Steve Albini.
We'll always regret not accepting your job application back in 2003!
(1/3)
Had a great time yesterday presenting at @arq_deldelirio's symposium on Predictive Processing and Psychosis. Great discussion and Q&A session — thanks for having me!
📌Internacional Conference📢
📌Symposia 3
Exposición: Federico Bongiorno👏
@pablolopezsilva @CRosenPhD @arq_deldelirio @ComplejosISCV @SocialesUV @uvalpochile
Federico Bongiorno retweeted
On the blog today, @evan_westra distinguishes between two types of beliefs; epistemic beliefs and symbolic beliefs. Each describe different mental states and have different functions.
buff.ly/3uBwCso
ALT Evan Westra
Federico Bongiorno retweeted
It's finally out! Our large-scaled replication attempt of the induced compliance paradigm in the study of cognitive dissonance: journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.…
Federico Bongiorno retweeted
I note also a recent paper by @philcorlett and @fedebng. They explore how far the standard model can go in meeting challenges to the PC account – no time to compare and contrast here but worth reading (10/10)
nitter.gq/fedebng/status/1742851…
Why are delusions adopted rather than something more plausible, or rather than nothing at all? Where do they come from?
I address these questions in a new paper with @PhilCorlett1, just out in @AustralJPhilos. You can check it out below (open access):
doi.org/10.1080/00048402.202…
Federico Bongiorno retweeted
Not sure if anyone is out there on twitter now, but, in case: New paper with @noham_wolpe, @jessharding1302, Christoph Teufel, @double_0_stefan and Victor Navarro
thelancet.com/journals/lanps…
Federico Bongiorno retweeted
A fascinating essay by a professional philosopher about his experience of schizophrenia.
“There have been near-collapses, but I have managed to keep a job for 30 years. I have not, until recently, been open about my diagnosis…”
academic.oup.com/schizophren…
Federico Bongiorno retweeted
Ever wonder what principled distinction can be drawn between religious delusion and religious belief? We manage it well in practice, but it can be hard to achieve reflective clarity on it. ... Here's my, & Simon Clarke's, own new suggestion - Open Access: tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.…
Federico Bongiorno retweeted
New paper in @WIREs_Reviews Cognitive Sciences with my fellas @MiguelNundePGor & @VictorDezCastro
What are delusions? Examining the typology problem
wires.onlinelibrary.wiley.co…
@arq_deldelirio @uvalpochile @InvestigandoUV @ComplejosISCV @SocialesUV
Federico Bongiorno retweeted
I think people are mostly into astrology because they find it fun to think and talk about, and because the category of “belief” involved is not aimed at truth or regulated much by evidence.
The number of people who believe in astrology is like a bellwether for how scientifically- and critically-minded your society is.
So it's a bit grim that it seems to be so trendy again. What explains its new popularity? I consider some reasons here: inews.co.uk/news/why-saturn-…
