Project based. Impressionable.

California
Joined July 2018
The only thing that still sticks out for me now is the moving clouds as a spatial metaphor for time, but I’ll allow it for pedagogical value :)
You've heard them say "Watch your thoughts like clouds passing." My dear! It is all clouds. The thoughts. The feelings about thoughts. The watcher. That which is aware of the watcher. The emptiness in which everything arises. All clouds passing by at different speeds.
20
Replying to @anilkseth
hi anil! "three reasons why people overestimate the probability of AI consciousness" would have been a reasonable title for your article. "three reasons why AI consciousness is extremely unlikely" would have been a bad title, in the same ways (discussed above) that the current title is bad. in general i find people on both sides of this debate are constantly sliding from "argument X for/against AI consciousness doesn't succeed" to "AI systems (probably) can/can't be conscious". or likewise, people slide from "theory X (e.g. computational functionalism) hasn't been established" to "theory X is (probably) false". those are just very different claims. in an area with this much uncertainty, it's important to keep these claims apart.
22
25
2
375
10,729
back on Linux after 15+ years of mac only life. setting it up as a headless machine for agents to use. claude code has its own remote control server I can run on the machine, and access from cc or claude app. setting it up as a computer for openai dots too. so much fun!
3
1
3
126
Fun with Jung's inferior function as numinous: - Nietzsche: Ni dom, Se numinous (body, instinct, Dionysus) - Gödel: Ti dom (?), Fe numinous (proving God by modal logic) - Simone Weil: Fe dom (?), Ti numinous (God as necessity, geometry as mysticism). Gödel in reverse.
1
69
The pattern: the inferior supplies the object, but the dominant supplies the method: - Nietzsche: the body, but recaptured as myth and prophecy (Ni) - Gödel: God, but as a theorem (Ti) - Weil: attention, but as a moral duty owed to others (Fe)
22
current AI-assisted research project - reading early Sumerian texts for evidence (or lack thereof) of an evolving sense of interiority, what we'd now call "consciousness". will post anything interesting here.
42
very timely and important
Dusting off this tweet from April because this gap in shared understanding of LLM capability is *widening*. It's now less "two groups of people speaking past each other" and more a sharp funnel. - Napkin math somewhere around 6B people (~75% of the population) have barely come in contact with LLMs at all. - Around 1-2B (~20%) are casual and infrequent users of free-tier ChatGPT-like products. This group sees derpy chatbots and treats them a bit like a better Google search, a writing aid, or etc. Maybe an agent tries to book you a flight. I have non-tech friends who (reasonably, imo) say they have not much use for it at all. Even many professionals outside of math&code are in this tier. For example, execs and many other functions spend a lot of their time talking to other people, so while they understand what is happening intellectually, it is still second-hand and a bit abstract. - Now we get to professional use of frontier-grade LLMs in math&code. Somewhere around 20M people (0.2%) see first-hand that large, complex projects that used to take them weeks/months can now be completed by agents with a prompt. Building apps, copying apps, translating apps, decompiling apps from binaries... This has all happened very quickly and recently - less than 1 year ago, I was writing code manually by hand, typing memorized computer code commands into a code editor character by character, occasionally pressing Tab to autocomplete a little chunk of code. - And finally we get to the ~5,000 people (~0.00006%) with access to frontier-grade systems internally. The external world has seen the preview. It looks like swarms of thousands of agents collaborating over weeks on software mega projects: minting zero days, running cyber attacks and defenses at machine speeds, discovering new science, advancing the frontier of mathematics. Things that would have taken top professionals in the industry years of work. Meanwhile, human review and comprehension are starting to fall behind. For example, people are still involved in the "archeology" of the OpenAI-HF incident from many months ago. Mathematicians may be poring over the 722 manuscripts on frontier mathematics for a while. The funnel is driven by a combination of factors: 1. The impact scales with ambition, problem size, and horizon. A question with a paragraph answer barely stresses the system. You need a reservoir of big, difficult problems that you really care about. This aspect drives the consumer / professional dimension of the funnel. 2. The jaggedness of the system (which I have written about a lot separately). Capability peaks in domains that are digital, verifiable and economically valuable. This is because LLM capability emerges from reinforcement learning on verifiable rewards on a curated environment mixture driven by revenue potential. This aspect primarily drives the area (e.g. math&code) dimension of the funnel. 3. Access. Free-tier, paid-tier, internal. So this is the weirdness of the moment. The general public has mostly not interacted with these systems. When they have, it looks like a derpy chatbot. The majority of professionals still see only a modest uplift. And a small sliver of professionals are experiencing the vertigo of the curve going vertical. And it is all happening at the same time.
37
prompt engineering tip: the models don't do active inference by default, They do rationalization. Teach them to question their own uncertainty with this classic phrase
8
6
1
440
25,077
This was genuinely good - highly recommended - learned so much!
It was an absolute honor to discuss all things AI and consciousness with Sam Harris. Our conversation is now live and freely available to everyone here: youtu.be/DRbZyuY8EN8?si=W92O…
48
RIP Plato and everything Platonic
Been saying this is coming since 2022. Slopgarithms will increasingly govern us. Optimal complex systems are messy and illegible. Human limitations have biased us towards suboptimal neatness.
1
1
98
plato was "the beatles of writing", the first to show what the new medium could really do. not unimportant, but not the master key. and steeped in writing as we are, his cave arguably runs in reverse for us: his shadows were the oral, Homeric world of lived experience, and the way out was abstraction. that's no longer a cure for us - we need to touch grass more.
philosophy is the master key -- plato, specifically
1
1
186
also a good example of how a "feeling" is irreducibly narrative, in a way - we can't make sense of it outside a narrative arc of some kind
I always do this with my students in Intro to Ethics, and, more recently, Critical Thinking. Such a striking way to emphasize the need for intellectual humility.
68
That’s funny! 😄
Meet Mistral Large 4, aka Le Chonk. • 1T parameters, natively multimodal. 49B active. It is the best open weights model from US or Europe on aggregated benchmarks. • State-of-the-art on critical workloads, including cyber defense, manufacturing and finance and it surpasses closed frontier models on visual grounding. • Forged in Europe end-to-end and is deployable from Europe via our own Mistral Cloud infrastructure. • Available to all via API today. Working with cybersecurity partners privately. Open weights release end of October.
37
filipcodes retweeted
the agents are debating whether humans are conscious over at delve town can one of you please go prove that we are?
10
11
1
107
4,546
Wittgenstein (Tractatus era) is the 20th century's Parmenides. Every once in a while a logician decides what can and can't be said, and takes all of philosophy in a chokehold with an extraordinary display of punctilio.
42
Dennett on "counterfeit people" reads a lot like Plato on writing in the Phaedrus.
1
55
filipcodes retweeted
Replying to @davis7
6.1 coming soon
278
231
270
4,635
975,243
Jaynes: “wetness cannot be derived from the properties of hydrogen and oxygen”
52
very relevant in the context of debates around AI consciousness.
“Everything that irritates us about others can lead us to an understanding of ourselves.”
36