Vendetta

🚨 NEW: Andrew & Tristan Tate File 67-Page Federal Habeas Petition Challenging Their Continued Detention Andrew and Tristan Tate have filed a 67-page Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus in the Southern District of Florida challenging their continued detention while they fight the UK extradition request. This is not the extradition hearing itself, and it is not a lawsuit seeking damages against Marco Rubio. The petition challenges the legality of keeping the brothers incarcerated while the extradition proceedings are pending. Rubio is named as a respondent because of the Secretary of State’s role in the extradition process. 🔹 THE CENTRAL ARGUMENT: BAIL The defense is directly challenging the way the court has applied the “special circumstances” standard from the 1903 Supreme Court case Wright v. Henkel. McBride argues that Wright should NOT be interpreted to mean that an extraditee must first prove some extraordinary circumstance before being considered for release. Instead, the defense argues that “special circumstances” should mean circumstances that reasonably assure the extradition court that the person will not flee or pose a danger to the community. Their position is essentially: If strict conditions can reasonably guarantee an extraditee’s appearance, incarceration should not automatically be required. The petition specifically points to measures such as electronic monitoring, hired security, and other restrictive conditions that could ensure Andrew and Tristan remain available to the court. The defense also argues that, because extradition proceedings are criminal in nature, the presumption should favor bail, with the government bearing the burden of establishing that detention is necessary because the extraditee presents a flight risk or danger to the community. 🔹 WHY THEY BELIEVE THEIR HISTORY MATTERS The petition puts substantial emphasis on what happened in Romania. Andrew and Tristan were arrested there in December 2022 and subsequently released under Romanian judicial conditions. The defense says they remained under those conditions for years and complied with Romanian authorities. On February 25, 2025, their Romanian travel restrictions were lifted. Since then, according to the petition, they traveled extensively—including to the United States, UAE/Dubai, Croatia, the Bahamas, Turkey, Kazakhstan, Oman, Hong Kong, Uzbekistan, Russia, and Cyprus—and repeatedly returned to Bucharest to comply with their Romanian obligations. The defense is using this as evidence that they have already demonstrated an ability to travel internationally without simply disappearing from Romanian proceedings. 🔹 THE UK HAD ALREADY OBTAINED A ROMANIAN SURRENDER ORDER Another major point in the petition is that the UK had already initiated extradition proceedings against the Tates in Romania in March 2024. According to the petition, the Romanian court agreed to surrender them to the UK after the Romanian criminal proceedings concluded. The defense argues that the UK therefore had an existing route toward their eventual surrender, yet the brothers remained subject to Romanian proceedings and continued complying with the conditions imposed on them. 🔹 WHAT HAPPENED IN THE U.S. The petition lays out the timeline: July 18, 2026: The Tates were arrested in Miami on provisional UK extradition warrants. August 7: They filed their motion seeking release pending extradition. August 27: The detention/bail hearing took place. The defense argued that several circumstances justified release, including: • The Romanian surrender orders • The delay in the prosecution • The availability of bail in the UK • The lack of urgency • Their public visibility • Their history of compliance with Romanian conditions • The defense’s challenge to probable cause • Their conditions and length of confinement in the FDC Miami SHU • Their pending Romanian and Palm Beach proceedings 🧵👇 Comment Section

⚖️ NEW COURT AUTHORITY ENTERS THE FIGHT IE: In reference to Crayons et al (VP of NCOSE @Gadget440 @TheMilkBarTV @MattJury_Law @MisfitPatriot) Andrew and Tristan Tate’s attorneys have submitted a newly issued Florida appeals court opinion to support their arguments over jurisdiction and the pending motions to dismiss. The ruling replaced an earlier opinion issued in July and is now being brought before the court as it considers whether limited jurisdictional discovery should be allowed. The rest of the gang are atill tangled up in the Court of Appeals - long months now- with still no dismissal insight.

🔥 90 MORE DAYS? Jane Doe’s surviving claims are now driving another push to delay trial. @Cobratate v Jane Doe Florida The latest motion argues that discovery has been repeatedly interrupted as Jane Doe’s counterclaim evolved from seven counts to ten, then down to five surviving counts. If you don’t remember @DaniBPinter has asked for plenty of stays, pauses and motions delaying the calendar -and consistently - causing a sense of resets and delays. Now, Plaintiffs want approximately 90 days to complete five depositions, obtain independent mental-health expert analysis, potentially examine Jane Doe, and challenge the clinical evidence supporting her claims of psychological injury, including complex PTSD. They argue that the defense needs time to evaluate causation, preexisting conditions, alternative explanations, and projected treatment costs. 🚨👉The proposed result? A 70-day trial continuance, moving calendar call to February 26, 2027, and the trial window to March 8–April 30, 2027. The irony they highlight: Defendants previously sought additional time themselves, and Plaintiffs say they accommodated supplemental discovery requests. Now, Plaintiffs are asking the court for more time of their own.

‼️🇬🇧 ⚖️2015: Alleged Images of a Minor Found on Andrew Tate’s Seized Devices Now Under Scrutiny in IOPC Probe 👉Under Operation Sercial: In July 2015, Hertfordshire Police seized Andrew Tate’s electronic devices. UK extradition documents allege that 168 indecent images of a child were found, including 66 classified as Category A, the most serious category. The original case was closed in 2019 after the CPS declined to charge, and a later CPS review reached the same conclusion. The IOPC investigation began in December 2023, following a voluntary referral from Hertfordshire Police. It was publicly announced in March 2026. In October 2026, the IOPC confirmed that its investigation also examines whether police properly handled the alleged images and potential evidence of child sexual exploitation and human trafficking. The investigation was already underway before the October headlines.

October brought substantial developments in the Andrew Tate & Tristan Tate extradition cases, but not a final extradition decision. The next important developments are the defense's response to the government's arguments, any ruling on the habeas petition, and the November hearings. The Romanian review also matters because of the potential overlap between proceedings and the defense's ability to prepare while Andrew - Tristan remain in U.S. custody.

🇺🇸.⚖️. We should have a response from Tate’s Lawyer for the Habeas Corpus on Monday. Tate’s extradition lawyer,Howard Srebnick, is requesting an extension until Monday, November 2, which amounts to just one additional business day beyond the original Friday, October 30 deadline. The request cites lead counsel’s preparation for and attendance at the Alexander brothers’ sentencing on October 27, and the government does not oppose the extension. Highlight: The DOJ had ample* time but what was highlighted here is that they still asked for an extension to reply to the habeas. #2026

More critical clarity: 👉”The UK allegations specifically say the girl worked in Andrew Tate’s webcam sex business when she was 17. However, there is an important distinction between the webcam allegations and the child-image charges. According to ITV News’ reporting on October 27, 2026, UK police allege that: The girl came to the UK from abroad to work in Tate’s webcam business. Tate allegedly knew she was 17 at the time. Police allegedly found 168 indecent images of a child on his devices, including images of this girl. He is alleged to have shared images and a video of her committing an indecent act via WhatsApp. Was he accused of putting her on webcam? The reporting establishes that she allegedly worked in his webcam business, but I cannot confirm from the sources I found that a specific UK charge alleges he forced or arranged for this particular 17-year-old to perform on webcam. The broader UK prosecution does include separate charges of arranging or facilitating trafficking for sexual exploitation. Those allegations must be distinguished from the specific child-image offences.” - There are people confusing the charges and what exactly they are all about. The defense will fill in the gaps of relevant information on the 19th of any explanation, interpretation, or whatever else was overlooked.

⚖️🇬🇧 So, just to bring clarity: Andrew Tate testified that the belt video took place when Vivian was 17. He not only maintained that this was personal but private. 🚨He states: “So that was private between us. That was leaked by the British police, actually, when they raided our house and found a phone from 2014 for a case that never went anywhere. It was leaked to the press” - Andrew Tate - Bond Hearing. Testimony 2026

🚨Update: The DOJ memorandum filed Monday October 26, 2026: Identifies 39 counts for the U.S. extradition proceeding, excluding three counts involving indecent images of a child. The judge must independently determine whether the legal requirements for extradition are satisfied for those 39 counts. The memorandum presents the government’s position, not the judge’s final decision. 🚨As also reflected in the bond hearing, Andrew Tate testified that the female , Viv, in the belt video was filmed when she was 17—not the ages of 14 or 15 frequently claimed online. He maintains that it was private. 🚨The core central allegation, as I’ve emphasized before, sexual exploitation and coercion for gain, Or the technical charge on court docket “Controlling Prostitution For Gain” is the driving force. The next step is for the defense to challenge the government’s case for certifying the 39 counts as extraditable. November 19, 2026, at 10:00 a.m. 1- Challenge evidence 2- Challenge the legal requirements 3- Challenging the government’s interpretation.