šŸ§ŠšŸ¤“ @IcebergQuantum

Sydney, Australia
Joined December 2016
Two members of our surgery department
2
1
17
657
Your qubits are in good hands.
1
62
A trillion is one of the biggest numbers I personally know. So I was very surprised when someone posted on our slack to say we'd actually sampled a trillion shots of parts of our architecture. How!? New decoder! 1/4 iceberg-quantum.com/blog/rel…
2
6
1
34
2,463
ā€œIf you're not taking at least a trillion shots I don't wanna hear about itā€ — Larry Happy to share Pinnacle 1.2! Team really cooked with this one.
We’ve run trillions of simulations to test our fault-tolerant quantum architectures, thanks to our new decoder, Crevasse. We think it’s the first QLDPC decoder with both the speed and accuracy needed for utility-scale quantum computing. Release: iceberg-quantum.com/blog/rel…
5
255
Felix Thomsen retweeted
Feels like anything that is classically tractable is now going to be solved - and commoditized - very quickly. As a consequence, I’m optimistic that the set of problems that are fundamentally resistant to classical computers will become more obvious, more crisply understood, and maybe more urgent
my favorite line from geohot is "I can’t believe that some stupid combination of lasers and cold shit get you access to a different order of computational complexity." i bet you stupid combination of lasers and cold shit will give you a different order of computational complexity, albeit probably not in the way thats originally intended.
2
2
13
1,233
Really happy to release Pinnacle 1.1. New results across spin qubits, neutral atoms, trapped ions and superconducting qubits. iceberg-quantum.com/blog/pin…
1
3
13
751
Work with @diraqQC and @nvidia: we've validated that Pinnacle’s logical performance advantage holds up under the constraints of silicon spin-qubit hardware, and compiled logical circuits all the way down to physical operations using CUDA-Q Logical.
1
4
1
18
1,536
More of a lurker than a tweeter til now, but I agree with others who've said now is a good time to openly discuss feelings about AI in (quantum computing) research. So: would like to officially declare myself in camp 2 -- excited about the coming years!
Mixed timeline here on twitter with 2 camps: 1) this is the end of science for humans (because their input will soon be irrelevant) 2) this is the best time for science because we now have extremely powerful tools that makes us 1000x better researchers. Rooting very much for #2
1
1
9
549
Felix Thomsen retweeted
I got my first consulting testimonial 😼😸
6
2
112
2,993
For a while I have been trying to figure out how to articulate this idea that we need to be better people and care more. By "we", I mean technologists. We are again having this conversation, so it seems like a good time to get it out of my head. I find that many who take technology as a practice---an approach to life, work, anything---are of better character than those in the industry. The virtues of the hacker are, well, virtuous: they espouse a way of living that is good for the individual and good for the collective. But technology-the-industry is dominated by ideologies of outcomes. We think it needs must, because that is the only way you get the kind of extreme growth and scale that modern technology-the-industry demands: by doing it at all costs. The ends justify the means. In a competitive environment like technology-the-industry, such an approach will inevitably lead to the means rotting. Rot shows as a lack of integrity. We tolerate low integrity on a lot of scales in technology-the-industry and technology-the-culture. In the technology social set, duplicity is quite accepted, though certainly not ubiquitous. In technology startups, it is entirely normal to set fake targets, lie to investors, and sell visions that are, quite simply, not real. I am optimistic that this now seems to be falling apart. Why does this matter? Because technology is the most important industry in the world. It is how we bring the future closer. It is the dominant force in the modern western economy. It is a significant political power base. It is both the culture and the counter-culture. As Stewart Brand once wrote, "we are as gods and we might as well get good at it." How do we get good at it? I think it starts by seeing that there can be virtuous winners in tech and that virtue both takes and imparts strength. The greatest leaders have powerful virtues to match their great faults. Many of our most prominent current technology leaders have significant virtues: long-term thinking, generosity, mistrust of authority, anti-credentialism, incredible willpower and resilience. These are not soft qualities! In the fullness of time, virtue persists because vice is expensive, even if vice is the faster to start. In the fullness of time, we can be our better selves.
16
12
1
123
7,257
Felix Thomsen retweeted
turns out you can break RSA with just 100k physical qubits...
2
2
1
8
625
Today we’re releasing Pinnacle, our first fault-tolerant quantum computing architecture. It shows that order-of-magnitude reductions in the cost of fault tolerance are possible, with meaningful implications for timelines to useful quantum computing. We’ve also raised a $6m Seed round.
2
5
3
41
9,691
Excited to have been part of this project @IcebergQuantum helping to make useful quantum computers a reality as soon as possible! Check out our blog to learn more: iceberg-quantum.com/blog/mod…
4
15
2,451
Felix Thomsen retweeted
building our first quantum computer @IcebergQuantum
1
4
376