Chris Foddy retweeted
This is insane.
Cast your eyes down the number of payroll jobs added for British people then compare the number of jobs added for non-European migrant workers.
This is what Westminster did to the British people.
Chris Foddy retweeted
Most people know me and Danny Tommo don’t see eye to eye nomore, however I will always stand by what’s right. That man has to now sit in a cell, can’t provide for his children, can’t see his children or call them when he wants, potentially might not see them over Christmas.
Remanded until March, for criminal damage on property nobody owns? It’s outrageous and simply a political weapon to scare the rest of the country into acting against this treason while exposing the Two-Tier System.
Danny went and done something none of us had the bollocks to do because we all knew the risk. He is now paying the price for that. I put my Ego to one side and I say it loud and clear, Danny Tommo has took a bullet for the whole of Britain. Like him or not, it’s a fact.
Not long ago Palestine activists got 6 years for activism. We are under occupation by an evil cult that wants to silence and control humanity & take away our freedom.
It’s actually sad to see patriots laughing at a man who’s been locked up for trying to defend an invasion. I genuinely don’t find it funny, like the bloke or not nobody deserves to sit in a cell for defending his home.
Chris Foddy retweeted
🚨"I mean nobody would condone him throwing a plastic bottle and swearing at cops... but two years."
BREAKING: A 42 year old man has been jailed for two years after throwing a plastic bottle and swearing at police officers during an anti-migrant protest.
@TVKev
Chris Foddy retweeted
Gravelines tonight feels very different.
I’ve never witnessed this level of activity here before.
• Undercover officers hiding behind parked cars
• Three drones circling above the woods
• Suspected smugglers dropped off by a female driver directly in front of me
• The same officers who previously swore at me and drew a weapon during the incident with Patrick Christys suddenly taking the vehicle registration before leaving without a word
Something is clearly going on tonight.
The question is why?
Is this a genuine change in approach, or a knee jerk reaction to the growing civilian pressure and scrutiny along the French coast?
Either way, this is not normal for Gravelines.
I’ll be watching very closely.
Video from the 21st September on a dark early morning crossing
That’s a smuggler swimming off
Chris Foddy retweeted
Something fascinating is happening in British politics.
And Labour is making a fundamental strategic mistake.
For decades, British Muslims were among Labour’s most reliable voting blocs. In 2019, the British Election Study put Muslim support for Labour at 79%.
By 2024, it had collapsed to 36%.
But where did those voters go?
Increasingly, they began electing their own local and community representatives - particularly candidates campaigning explicitly around Gaza and Muslim concerns.
Look at the 2024 election.
In the 21 constituencies where Muslims were more than 30% of the population, Labour’s average vote fell from 65% to 36%.
Blackburn.
Dewsbury and Batley.
Birmingham Perry Barr.
Leicester South.
All were taken from Labour by independents.
In Leicester South, Shockat Adam defeated Labour’s Jonathan Ashworth after campaigning heavily on Gaza.
This wasn’t statistical noise. Academic analysis describes a clear electoral shift away from habitual Labour voting toward Greens and, most dramatically, explicitly pro-Palestinian independents.
Labour panicked.
It saw a constituency it had taken for granted breaking away and, rather than reconsidering the wisdom of communal politics, tried to win it back by moving increasingly toward the political demands of the activists competing for those voters.
And Israel became the currency.
Britain recognised Palestine.
It sanctioned Israeli ministers and settlers.
It restricted arms-export licences.
And now Labour has gone substantially further: Britain is moving to ban trade in goods from Israeli settlements as part of a new international sanctions initiative.
There is even a revealing parallel elsewhere in Labour policy.
Documents disclosed under Freedom of Information legislation recently showed that the government approached Britain’s equality watchdog about adopting its controversial definition of anti-Muslim hostility despite the EHRC’s objections. Former EHRC chair Baroness Falkner explicitly accused Labour of pursuing the definition to win Muslim votes.
But here’s the irony:
It will not work.
Labour seems to assume that if it moves far enough on Israel, Muslim voters who abandoned it will return.
They won't.
The electoral evidence suggests something much more consequential is happening.
Those voters have discovered that they don’t need Labour anymore.
Why vote Labour and pressure Labour politicians to represent your priorities when you can elect a politician who campaigns on those priorities directly?
And it creates a potentially disastrous equation for Labour:
It can keep moving against Israel, absorbing the diplomatic, economic, legal and political consequences - while still losing the voters it is trying to recover.
Israel has already retaliated against Britain’s latest measures, including announcing the closure of the British consulate in East Jerusalem.
And Labour should not assume there is no domestic electoral price on the other side.
But there is a much bigger lesson here - one that goes far beyond Israel.
This is what short-term politics looks like when politicians think in election cycles but demographic and cultural changes last for generations.
Britain accepted very high levels of immigration while its political establishment largely assumed that integration into the existing party system would continue. Labour in particular became accustomed to overwhelming support from many immigrant and minority communities.
But people are not permanent possessions of political parties.
As communities become larger and geographically concentrated, they acquire the numbers to organize independently - and increasingly they can elect candidates specifically representing the issues most important to those communities.
Gaza demonstrated the consequences.
An academic study of the 2024 election describes the emergence of The Muslim Vote, which explicitly sought to mobilise Muslim voters in constituencies with significant Muslim populations and direct them toward candidates capable of defeating Labour MPs over Gaza.
That should be an extraordinary warning about the development of sectarian voting blocs and the fragmentation of British politics.
Foreign affairs thousands of miles away can become decisive issues in British constituencies.
Political loyalty can increasingly organize around religion, ethnicity or events in ancestral homelands rather than the traditional left-right arguments of British politics.
And concentrated populations make that political power considerably greater under Britain’s constituency system. Researchers examining the 2024 result specifically note that geographic concentration amplifies these electoral effects.
This is all about the extraordinary shortsightedness of the political class that helped create the conditions for increasingly communal politics and apparently never considered what would happen when those communities stopped voting the way established parties expected.
Labor learned the wrong lesson and is trying to retrieve those votes by going against national interest.
Foreign policy should be based on Britain’s national interests and consistently applied law - not an escalating auction for communal votes.
Labour may discover that it sacrificed one constituency in an attempt to appease another, only to lose both - and the country - in the process.
There is a persistent claim - controversial but not easily dismissed - that once a Muslim population approaches roughly 16%, the political struggle over a country’s identity intensifies and becomes hard to reverse. Historically, Demographic consolidation precedes institutional change. Several European states are now moving toward that range - and the debate is no longer theoretical.
Muslim populations today stand at roughly 7–8% in the UK (6.5% in the 2021 Census, with London near 15%), 9–10% in France, 8–9% in Sweden, 6–7% in Germany, and 5–6% in the Netherlands. Poland remains below 0.1%. Israel is roughly 18% Muslim nationally, with far higher concentrations in certain regions.
The thesis describes stages. Below 2%, communities are small and politically marginal. Between 2–5%, institutional networks consolidate. Between 5–10%, influence becomes structurally visible - especially in concentrated urban districts where local norms shift faster than national averages.
Sweden illustrates the arc. Around 2000, estimates placed its Muslim population near 3–4%. Today it stands close to 9%, much higher in Malmö and certain suburbs. Over that same period Sweden saw a surge in gang shootings, bombings, repeated urban unrest, and a 23-place drop in the Global Peace Index over 8 years. Quran burnings sparked unrest, diplomatic pressure, and speech-restriction debates.
The change was gradual and cumulative, but its effects compound. Demographic change is not linear; once networks, voting blocs, and parallel institutions consolidate, the political impact accelerates. „Muslim majority by 2050“ projections assume stable migration and smooth integration, ignoring how concentrated growth can reshape institutions long before any national majority.
France, near 10%, endured the Charlie Hebdo massacre, the November 2015 Paris attacks, Nice in 2016, and repeated Christmas market security threats.
Germany experienced the Berlin Christmas market attack and continues trying to discover jihadist networks. Britain faced Manchester Arena, London Bridge, record post-October 7 antisemitic attacks, and recurring de facto blasphemy controversies - alongside pressure to regulate public conduct during Ramadan.
Above 10% in concentrated districts, accommodation pressures intensify: religious arbitration demands, altered school norms, and assertive street mobilization. Proponents of the 16% threshold argue that beyond that scale, electoral math and municipal power begin to shift permanently.
In Israel, where Muslims comprise roughly 18% nationally and form majorities in certain areas, the country has endured recurring waves of terrorism over decades - stabbings, vehicular assaults, and organized militant attacks that at times have become a near-daily reality.
History shows a pattern. Egypt shifted from majority Christian to overwhelmingly Muslim. Lebanon’s demographic change altered its balance and preceded civil war. Iran moved from Zoroastrian majority to Islamic theocracy. Pakistan defined itself constitutionally through Muslim majority rule. Indonesia gradually Islamized; Aceh enforces Sharia today. In each case, demography came first - constitutional change quickly followed.
The institutional consequences are visible across many Muslim-majority states: compulsory veiling in Iran, blasphemy laws in Pakistan, criminalization of same-sex relations in parts of the Middle East, religious policing structures embedded in law. Women’s and LGBTQ rights shift as governance shifts.
The issue is what sustained, high-volume immigration means for civilizational continuity. Immigration reshapes voting blocs, education systems, public norms, and law enforcement realities. The real question for Europe is whether it understands that immigration is not just labor policy or GDP growth. It is a long-term cultural decision. And history suggests that decisions made casually can reshape nations permanently.
#kist what a disappointing reaction to transformative news. Hopefully we will get a full disclosure of the financial impact from the signing of the royal decree in the next few days from the board.
Chris Foddy retweeted
England is in shock.
Not the shock of surprise. The shock of recognition. That moment when we finally admit what we have been seeing for years but were too polite, too exhausted, too bullied to name.
Our capital city flies foreign flags on New Year's Eve and its mayor jokes about independence. Our Prime Minister appointed a Hamas sympathiser as his chief legal adviser and a convicted fraudster as his deputy. Our police force spent £631 million on diversity training while corruption investigations collapsed by 70% and rape gangs operated with impunity. Our Energy Secretary oversaw £44 million vanishing into fraudulent schemes. Our Chancellor pocketed £54,000 from a woman who accused him of failing 1,400 raped girls. Our Manchester Mayor covered up grooming gangs while taking UAE blood money.
This is not a government. This is a looting party with parliamentary privilege.
Let us be specific, shall we? Let us do what the BBC won't.
Andy Burnham. The "King of the North" who lost his own working class constituency because his own people saw through him. The Health Secretary who buried 1,200 deaths at Mid Staffordshire to protect institutional reputations. The man who voted for an illegal war on fabricated intelligence, then voted eighteen times against inquiries into his own crime. The Mayor who spent £27 million on consultants while children were raped in the streets he controlled. The Prime Minister who, within weeks of taking office, exchanged texts with an imposter posing as Trump's chief of staff because his operational security is a joke. Who appointed Andy Slaughter, photographed shaking hands with Hamas officials in Jerusalem, to decide which groups Britain proscribes as terrorists. Who made Louise Haigh, convicted of fraud against the police, his de facto Deputy Prime Minister. Who made Miatta Fahnbulleh, daughter of a Liberian dictator's minister, Energy Secretary after she lost £44 million to fraud. Who made John Healey, who was "not convinced" an inquiry into 1,400 raped girls in his constituency would help them, his Chancellor. Who made Bev Craig, who covered up Manchester's grooming gangs, Mayor of the city region.
This is not failure upward. This is criminality institutionalised.
And London? London has Sadiq Khan. The human rights lawyer who freed Louis Farrakhan, Louis Farrakhan, to enter Britain. Who consulted on the defence of a 9/11 conspirator. Who visited terror suspects in prison and shared platforms nine times with an imam who called women subservient and gays condemned. Who signed a letter blaming 7/7 on British foreign policy, not on the bombers. Who has presided over a 72% rise in knife crime, was officially rebuked by the statistics watchdog for lying about it, and stripped the Met of AI tools that catch corrupt officers. Who extracted £500 million from drivers through ULEZ while his own assessments admitted it had "negligible effect on air quality." Who bankrupted TfL (£12 billion in debt) and hiked our council tax by 71%. Who lit the London Eye in EU colours on New Year's Eve and "joked" about declaring independence. Who denies grooming gangs exist in his city in 2026, calling survivors "politically motivated."
Our capital is being managed by a man who thinks it is his personal city state. Our country is being run by a cabinet that reads like a criminal indictment. Our police are more concerned with pronouns than burglaries. Our borders are sieves operated by Iranian terror units. Our media, our BBC, our ITV, our Channel 4, maintain a disciplined silence while MI5 stops twenty terrorist plots in a year and says nothing.
They do not serve us. They serve each other. They serve ideologies imported from American campuses and Gulf funded think tanks. They serve the next consultancy contract, the next peerage, the next sinecure in a Brussels bureaucracy or a UN agency.
And we? We pay for it all. We pay the ULEZ charges for air quality that doesn't improve. We pay the council tax hikes for services that don't arrive. We pay the TV licence for news that isn't reported. We pay for the diversity officers while our daughters are raped and our police are overwhelmed and our borders are crossed by people who hate us.
And where do these operatives report? To 16 Princes Gate, Knightsbridge. The Iranian Embassy. A Grade II listed building overlooking Hyde Park in London's most expensive postcode. The IRGC's London headquarters operates in plain sight, untouched, unraided, unclosed. We proscribed the group. We declared them terrorists. We gave ourselves the legal power to act. And then we did nothing. The Union Jack flies at half mast for dead monarchs while the flag of the Islamic Republic flies at full mast in our capital, directing operations against our own people. The building should be shuttered. The diplomats expelled. The networks dismantled. Instead, it remains open for business. A terror hub with a SW1A postcode. This is not diplomacy. This is surrender wearing a tie.
The Iranians know it. The IRGC runs smuggling routes across our Channel with impunity from their Knightsbridge embassy. They send operatives daily via small boats while our navy is deployed to diversity workshops. Trump kills IRGC operatives on Iranian soil. Burnham lets them walk free in London. That is the difference between a leader and a placeholder. Between a nation that survives and one that submits.
This is not incompetence. Incompetence is random. This is systematic. This is the deliberate dismantling of a nation by people who view its history as shameful, its people as obstacles, and its institutions as resources to be strip mined for their own advancement.
We have been told this is diversity. This is inclusion. This is progress.
It is not. It is conquest by administrative procedure. It is the replacement of competence with credentials, of justice with ideology, of truth with narrative.
The game is up. The receipts are filed. The pattern is proven.
England will not save itself. Either we do it, or it dies. Decide.
Chris Foddy retweeted
📢 A quick favour.
If you've got a couple of minutes to spare, I'd really appreciate your support.
Over the past few months I've created a number of UK Parliament petitions covering issues that I believe deserve public debate. Some are already live and collecting signatures, while one is currently seeking the required sponsors before it can be published.
Every signature, sponsor and share genuinely helps.
I'm not a politician, celebrity or large organisation, just an ordinary citizen who has taken the time to use the UK Parliament petition system to raise issues that I believe are worthy of discussion.
You don't have to agree with every petition. Please just support the ones you personally believe in.
Thank you to everyone who has already signed, sponsored, shared or commented. Your support is genuinely appreciated.
📌 Ban all face coverings at protests and demonstrations
Face coverings at protests allow individuals to conceal their identity, making it harder to prevent and investigate crime, disorder and intimidation. This petition calls for a clear, universal ban on face coverings at protests while preserving the right to peaceful protest.
🔗 petition.parliament.uk/petit…
📌 Review laws protecting employees from dismissal for lawful speech outside work
This petition calls for a review of the legal framework protecting employees from dismissal for lawful speech made outside work, to ensure employers can only dismiss staff where there is clear and demonstrable harm to legitimate business interests.
🔗 petition.parliament.uk/petit…
📌 Require all eligible UK citizens to vote, with a "None of the Above" option
This petition proposes compulsory voting in UK General Elections, with reasonable exemptions, alongside a "None of the Above" option so voters can formally reject every candidate without being forced to support one.
🔗 petition.parliament.uk/petit…
📌 End taxpayer funding for diversity & inclusion initiatives in the public sector
This petition calls for an end to taxpayer funding for Equality, Diversity and Inclusion (EDI) initiatives, including dedicated roles, departments, programmes and staff networks, with public funds instead focused on delivering frontline public services.
🔗 petition.parliament.uk/petit…
🆕 Seeking sponsors before it can go live
📌 Review immigration laws since 1997 and repeal barriers to removing illegal migrants, or hold a referendum
This petition calls for a review of immigration, asylum, nationality and human rights laws introduced since 1997. It proposes repealing or amending laws that significantly restrict the UK's ability to remove people who have no legal right to remain. If Parliament concludes those laws should remain unchanged, it also calls for the issue to be put to the British public in a national referendum.
If you're eligible to sponsor UK Parliament petitions and support this proposal, I'd be extremely grateful if you could sponsor it. Once it receives enough sponsors and is approved, I'll share the public petition so everyone can sign and share it.
🔗 petition.parliament.uk/petit…
Whether you agree with one, several or all of these petitions, every signature, sponsor and share helps bring issues into public debate and ensures they can be considered through the democratic process.
If you know someone who may support any of these proposals, please consider sharing this post with them.
Thank you to everyone who has taken the time to support my petitions, it really does make a difference.
Chris Foddy retweeted
We’ll never invest in Britain again, says FTSE oil giant
----------------------------------------------------------
"CEO of one of Britain’s oldest energy companies has said it will never invest in the UK again because of the country’s “crazy” politics."
"It comes after Hunting, one of the London Stock Exchange’s oldest listed companies, shed dozens of staff and shut down 80% of its UK operations last year."
"Founded in 1874 as a shipping business, Hunting uses advanced engineering to make high-pressure pipes for subsea oil and gas wells as well as for warplanes and spacecraft."
"The company is perhaps best known for building the fuselages and tail frames for Britain’s Lancaster Bomber to help win the Second World War."
----------------------------------------------------------
"Four of the company’s five UK centres, including its main Scottish site, have closed in the last year, leaving a 30-strong London head office and a subsidiary in Newcastle."
-------------------------------------------------------
telegraph.co.uk/business/202…
