A government that interferes as little as possible in the affairs of its citizens is preferential to any other. ReTweets!= Agree
United States
Joined October 2010
- Tweets24.8K
- Following3.3K
- Followers2.5K
- Likes39.6K
Pinned Tweet
If you follow me - guns, technology, coffee, politics, & physics. Some humor may offend.
You have been warned.
ALT You Don't Hate The Meda Enough
This post is unintentionally hilarious. Poor guy doesn't realize what leftism leads to. He's almost got it.
What do you call a government that wants to censor speech, arrest opposing politicians, and is made up of convicted criminals? Maybe Authoritarian and Fascist?
He even types this --> "Bolsonaro supporters...who assume that Lula is somehow behind the judges"
The judge was Lula's personal attorney. He can't believe what he's saying, or else he truly is a useful idiot.
I am going to write something below that should be seen as the musings of one who celebrated – and still celebrates – Lula’s victory over Bolsonaro Jr. Here it goes:
I cannot for the life of me justify why o why Brazil’s courts had to demand of Bolsonaro that he hands over his passport the moment he lost the election. That he disputed the veracity of the election result is a sign of a faulty character, evidence that he is a bad loser. BUT, he had every right to being a bad loser; to dispute, rightly or wrongly, any result.
As for the argument that he was being investigated for other misdemeanours or crimes, that doesn’t wash either: What would have happened if Bolsonaro had won the election? Would the judges also prevent him from travelling abroad, as President-elect? I very much doubt that – which means that the judges were conflating executive and judicial powers.
To those who tell me that the Bolsonaro clan is a fascistic, criminal family, my reply is: You and I may very well think that. Alas, the judiciary has no right to use its powers to indict and to pursue someone because – or immediately after – they lost an election. It is shameful, to be precise. And it is also dangerous for those of us on the left who know what it means to be banned and hounded by rogue judges and police commissioners.
But I also have a message to Bolsonaro supporters, or those sitting on the fence, who assume that Lula is somehow behind the judges. He is not! This is the same court that imprisoned, falsely, Lula himself. What we have in Brazil is a judiciary that overreaches and habitually crosses the line that ought to separate judicial from political power.
It is such a shame that a judge took it upon himself to go after Bolsonaro on the eve of his defeat and, in doing so, to sully Lula’s stupendous victory.
One last point that my comrades in Brazil should note: If Bolsonaro and Rubio wanted to mount a campaign against Lula and Brazilian democracy they could never have been aided better than by that judge’s reckless writ.
Founding Ideals retweeted
Translation:
As Brazil's leader: thanks Milei, Trump, Americans for freedom refuge.
Sunday fraud: illegal STF voting extension let Lula gain 10M+ votes impossibly + power abuses. Annul ticket.
Compromised judge launched persecution. No crime; witch hunt to silence/protect corrupt judges. Coup vs father too.
Family to US for safety. Left to lead free, not flee. Like past exiles.
Democracy fight begins. Lead opposition from abroad. Peaceful mobilize vs dictatorship. Stay firm. Ends when Brazil free.
God bless Brazil.
Flávio Bolsonaro
Founding Ideals retweeted
Seven minutes after the election results came in, federal police, dispatched by Supreme Court Justice Moraes, moved to seize Bolsonaro's passport. Shame on global leaders and the media for defending Lula and Moraes turning Brazil into a banana Republic.
Founding Ideals retweeted
The party of "muh democratic norms" trying to steal an election by tricking voters, nbd.
NYT confirms that aides associated with Alaska Dem Senate candidate Mary Peltola spent months recruiting other candidates, including one named Dan Sullivan, to try to confuse voters and take votes away from incumbent Senator Dan Sullivan.
nytimes.com/2026/10/28/us/po…
These fucktards screaming for Vyshinsky style justice and Stalinist style repression of free speech.
The ghost of Soviet authoritarianism has more murdering to do.
Who said Donald's was conservative?
This democrat's not great at English.
Conservative do not march for Trayvon Martin, nor do they make videos crying over the "murder" of George Floyd, but #DataCenterDonalds did
Notice the astro turfing democrat pretending not to understand that there are more conservative candidates on the ballot.
In other comments he claims to be voting for Jolly because he's white.
Never change racist democrats.
Hey
@grok
What are 5 reasons for people to unfollow me?
You can vote your way into communism but not out of it.
Power move by the coolest raccoon on X. Rumor has it that Guardians of the Galaxy characters were modeled after Rascal. This is why the Rocket character loves quality fire power...
Without further ado, and with nothing but class, Rascal has decided to stay in line with this rare Terrific Tactical Tuesday Twofer by offering up a Glock 19 Gen5 Acro 9mm AND a Daniel Defense DDM4V7 5.56 rifle!
I asked the cool coon whether it should go to one lovely soul or if we should divide them up.
"Let the people decide" is an exact quote so that we will do.
See poll and make your opinion heard, below.
Good Luck
Godspeed
Keep Going, MFs
Founding Ideals retweeted
Some of y’all claim to have respect for Gov. DeSantis and say you appreciate what he did for our state (as you should), but are sprinting to the polls to vote for this guy who is giddy about saying he’ll reverse all of DeSantis’ progress day 1
Founding Ideals retweeted
Also, he stands in the way of a coup.
Here are the top 5 reasons Democrats want to remove SecWar Pete Hegseth:
1. He exemplifies American strength and pride. They need to demoralize the American spirit for a communist takeover, especially in our troops.
2. He’s abolishing DEI and firing woke Generals. Their communist infiltrators are being hunted and destroyed.
3. He’s strengthening our military power and reestablishing US hegemony. Dems need it weakened from within so it can potentially defeated by China/Russia and absorbed into NATO/UN.
4. He’s unapologetically blowing up cartel drug boats. Dems want to protect their cartel partners’ profits, and keep the human and drug trafficking flowing.
5. He’s secured the border. They want millions more to stuff the 2030 census in blue states.
Pete hasn’t done anything illegal, but he is an existential threat to the communist agenda.
This is true - which begs the question, why?
If, by the way, the same situation that just happened in Brazil had happened but with the parties switched -- if Bolsonaro had won last night's election and then a pro-Bolsonaro judge sent the Federal Police to seize Lula's passport and bar him from leaving the country -- every major western media outlet and liberal NGOs would be screaming about the authoritarian attack on Brazil's elections and the destruction of basic freedoms.
