tomek (@fromToruAI) profile picture

CEO

Warsaw, Poland
Joined December 2013
Photo by tomek (@fromToruAI)Photo by tomek (@fromToruAI)Photo by tomek (@fromToruAI)Photo by tomek (@fromToruAI)Photo by tomek (@fromToruAI)Photo by tomek (@fromToruAI)Photo by tomek (@fromToruAI)Photo by tomek (@fromToruAI)Photo by tomek (@fromToruAI)
transferring information is bottleneck both agent to person and person to person what are your ways?
13
sounds really promising have you already tested?
Google just open-sourced the plugin thousands of its engineers use every day to stop AI from shipping sloppy code. It's called the Elephant-Goldfish Model. No code until the plan survives. No AI grading its own homework. No context collapse halfway through a feature. The idea is simple and kind of brilliant. The Elephant is one long-running AI session that remembers everything: the architecture, the intent, every small decision. It writes zero code. It interviews you, argues with you, and keeps the record. The Goldfish are fresh AI sessions with no memory at all. They never saw your design conversation, so they don't inherit its blind spots. Here's how it works: → egm-brainstorm: you and the Elephant debate options under a strict no-code rule → egm-draft: you produce a Markdown design doc with the problem, the plan, the alternatives, and the exact files to change → egm-review: one Goldfish has to explain the design back. If it gets it wrong, the doc is ambiguous and goes back for redrafting → Then several Goldfish attack it as hostile reviewers hunting edge cases, hidden dependencies and logic gaps → A final Goldfish makes the go/no-go call: are file paths, data structures and function signatures all present and unambiguous? Here's why this matters: Google's team says AI made coding faster but also sped up slop, bugs and session context collapse. Speed without guardrails just scales your mistakes. This flips the order. The design gets attacked before a single line exists. Here's the wildest part: This isn't a research demo. Google says thousands of Googlers run it daily to ship production code. The repo ships the Markdown rules, the reviewer personas and the review workflows. Free, Apache 2.0. The honest trade-off: it only runs inside Antigravity for now, with other environments coming. And security isn't on the default reviewer list. You'd add your own security Goldfish. github.com/google/elephant-g…
14
how much you care about yours success?
1
51
sovereignty in ai becoming more and more important
1
39
tomek retweeted
Neuralink’s first product is called Telepathy. It enables high-speed communication with computers or humans simply by thinking. Output bandwidth will vastly exceed the fastest human speech or typing in a few years. Read that sentence again.
Our engineers recently visited one of our speech restoration study participants for a 72-hour hackathon. The goal: rapidly prototype as many features as possible to enhance the experience of using Neuralink to communicate with thought. Here are some of the things we built 🧵
3,593
7,009
1,398
56,473
7,279,999
do you use agents or your agents are using you?
41
lets go whats your median?
50
how hard it is to start up?
57
is software solved? problem defining whats matter most
1
2
192
FDE is nearest future of dev + business
1
1
49
opus5.5 delivering nicely complex scope - to the point :)
20
have a feeling that astra's main goal is different than solving problems :,)
18
FDE is high cortisol proffesion
22
OpenClaw got stuck again... Completely unresponsive.. KoroMind helped me debug it and fix it
1
1
52
tomek retweeted
Ads are coming to AI. But not to Claude. Keep thinking.
1,689
3,823
2,999
49,974
5,281,560
know this moment when created new learnings, guidelines for your agents to happily run your agents as independent team and leave 1h later BOSS alike😎 come back to look at the newly created PR all you see is the AI slop that nobody asked for 😮🫨🫠
2
4
68
2026 - nobody have ever seen so much slopy code
1
85
Working with agent/s? Being on the same page is the key.
2
46
Who else have an alias for claude dangerously-skip-permissions?
48