Dear Megan: Over the years, I've genuinely tried to sidestep direct confrontation with you, understanding your health struggles and trusting that your personal reflection and dialogue with @ConceptualJames would eventually help you see how far you've strayed from where you should be. Regrettably, you keep repeating the same painful patterns, haven't made use of the time I've graciously offered over the years, and seemingly haven't reviewed any of the substantive, fact-based materials I've presented throughout these 8 years - each containing thorough supporting evidence. Thankfully, others have written factual books that are free from fertile fallacies that used the information trails that I have provided for them. Documentary films have been made using the supporting evidence that both James and I have provided that exhibit an objectively true historical examination of the who, what, when, how and why critical theory and postmodernism was infused into education, faith, research, healthcare, entertainment, media, financial insitutions, political organizations, and corporations. And although I offer to help with many different authors and journalists, I normally lead them to pathways where they can find the evidence that they need as opposed to throwing the evidence right in their lap. I also am careful with people that could use the information that I provide that could potentially wind up being bad actors. And, maybe I missed the point where you have apparently asked again and again for information, but you have ignored the warnings that @ConceptualJames , @billroach_ and I have given you in regards to the organizations that you have decided to join and defend. I have explained to you that these organizations would eventually call for Balkanization. We explained that the organizations you were mixing with were leading down the same path of embracing critical theory, postmodernism, distributism and integralism. You decided to ignore these warnings from friends and continued down this path. We have both explained to you that transformational history occurs through the use of the dialectic and that the current movement that you are defending is the *antithesis* or *reaction* phase of the dialectic that will eventually lead to *synthesis.* So, you have ended up endorsing people and organizations that are suggesting that the "New Right" use the same analytical tools that the Woke Left was using in Biblical interpretation just 7 years ago. You are propagating information from organizations that are using Machiavellian tactics with other people of faith. And lastly, you have sat by silently a these organizations have made truly vile false accusations about my friend @ConceptualJames , my family, and yours truly. I'm not referring to "he spoke at such-and-such conference with so-and-so" accusations: I am referring to disgusting, nauseating accusations sourced from "your friends." @ConceptualJames and I will continue to use truthful methods. We will continue to shed objective light in the radically subjective darkness: on both the Left and the faux Right. And I will personally do all that I can to preserve the Gospel and our constitutional republic. Capiche?

The observation that NatCon is starting to look more like a Groyper conference is correct, and in more ways than one. The Groypers, Fuentes, Sneako, the Isker/Torba set, and the rest of that circuit are not going to turn up at NatCon, and that is by strategic design. That faction is built as an influencer operation aimed at frustrated young men. NatCon is built for a different room: policymakers, intellectuals, diplomats, and academics, the blazer-and-Brooks-Brothers crowd. A different aesthetic and "voice" but the same underlying program. What unites them is the diagnosis and the prescription: -America is already over. -The Constitution is just a piece of paper. -Multipolarity is inevitable. -The U.S. needs a divorce. -Authoritarianism is not such a bad thing once you stop being sentimental about liberalism. -A monarchical episcopate looks attractive. -Franco was awesome. -Russia and China, whatever their faults, seem to have figured out something the liberal West refused to see. Then, add the post-work, distributive economics and you have the same postliberal package, just tailored to two audiences: one crass and online, one respectable and institutional. Every once in a while you will have a few figures that float in-between Groyper CN world and NatCon: Auron MacIntyre (not his real name), William Wolfe, and various Blaze commentators. The Woke Right does not require everyone to sound like Nick Fuentes. It only requires the same operating system: liberalism is the problem, some alien force has already ruined the country, and enforced adherence to a replacement order is the remedy. NatCon runs the polite version. The Groyper circuit runs the vulgar one. The messaging is the same. And yes, you have seen this before on the Left. @ConceptualJames, @CodyLibolt , @DefiyantlyFree , @SethDillon , @ClassicLibera12 , @billroach_ , @PhilWMagness, @jasonahart have been warning you for years that this simulation of conservatism was here to lead America down a destabilizing path. Maybe now is the time to start taking this seriously.