A description will appear here someday
Capyland
Joined August 2023
- Tweets2.5K
- Following3K
- Followers778
- Likes2.1K
BaseCattery is one of the more interesting low-cap ideas on Base
You hold $CATTERY → farm kittens → earn $BASECAT
Why it stands out:
your multiplier grows with hold time
up to 10x for stronger long-term holders
selling resets the multiplier, so weak hands lose their edge
creator fees are used to buy $BASECAT and distribute it to holders
payouts happen every 15 minutes
So the loop is simple:
hold longer = farm more kittens = get a bigger share of rewards
And the cap comparison is what makes this even more interesting:
$CATTERY is sitting around a 20k market cap, while another token with a very similar reward/holding concept had ath 350k ($CASHKITTEN with $cashcat)
Same general idea, but a much lower valuation here
That’s why BaseCattery feels underwatched to me:
cute concept, strong retention mechanic, real onchain reward loop, and still tiny cap
$CATTERY / $BASECAT worth watching
I’m the #1 $OUTBAG holder, and this is the utility I want to see:
Let tile owners RENT their space
Every owner sets their own daily rental price in $OUTBAG. Projects can rent a tile for 1 day, 7 days, 30 days — whatever they need
Each payment: → 50% goes to the tile owner 💰→ 50% gets burned 🔥
Why this is powerful for holders:
Your tile becomes a yield-generating asset. The better the position, the more you can potentially charge.
At the same time, every rental creates real demand for $OUTBAG and permanently removes part of the supply.
So holders get both: income from owning valuable tiles + stronger token utility
The board becomes digital real estate with its own economy
Bullish flywheel for $OUTBAG
@0xEtherlect outbag.fun/
Idea for $Outbag: let tile owners rent out their space
Projects could pay in $OUTBAG to rent a tile for a set period — 50% of the payment gets burned, and 50% goes to the tile owner
More utility for $OUTBAG, passive income for holders, and a recurring burn mechanism
@0xEtherlect
Fun fact: $duck 🦆 eat frong:native
Even more fun fact: unicorns don’t exist
Uniswap 🤝 launchpad
Sushi 🤝 launchpad
The DEX wars are evolving into launchpad wars
On one side: 🦄 with pools.trade and $uni $frong
On the other: 🦆 — Sushi × bnkr energy, now building pools.fun
I’m betting on $duck
🦆🦆sushi.com/robinhood/launchpa…
1/ There is now strong on-chain evidence that @TradePools itself launched $POOLS on Robinhood Chain.
CA:
0x7Fe3778B2520A5868fB8BC16FEa0f33dd9e7122a
This isn't based on the token name, logo, or a typed X handle.
It's inside the actual launch calldata.
robinhoodchain.blockscout.co…
🧵
2/ The launch transaction is:
0x7cca0c8eb394ad4628735e04e6f08e3f0080415f75118c7f040694c6209acc6c
robinhoodchain.blockscout.co…
It calls:
multicall(bytes[])
Method ID:
0xac9650d8
So we can inspect the launch inputs directly on-chain.
3/ The calldata contains the token metadata itself.
Hex:
547261646520506f6f6c73
→ Trade Pools
and:
504f4f4c53
→ POOLS
But this part alone proves almost nothing.
Anyone can copy a token name, ticker, logo or type TradePools into metadata.
The interesting part comes next.
4/ Embedded directly in the launch calldata is this JSON:
{"v":1,"xVerificationToken":"..."}
This is important because the X identity is not just sitting in ordinary token metadata.
The launch contains a separate verification token produced by the Pools.trade flow.
pools.trade/
5/ The raw hex beginning at the metadata field:
7b2276223a312c2278566572696669636174696f6e546f6b656e223a...
decodes to:
{"v":1,"xVerificationToken":"eyJ4X2hhbmRsZSI6IlRyYWRlUG9vbHMi..."}
Everything here is permanently recorded on Robinhood Chain.
Robinhood Chain mainnet:
Chain ID 4663
docs.robinhood.com/chain/con…
6/ Decode the payload of that xVerificationToken and you get:
x_handle: TradePools
x_user_id: 2080394757721735168
wallet_address: 0xe83E8EC76783d9f072D847EE69b7e630A8b6C501
iat: 1785947908895
That iat = 2026-08-05 16:38:28.895 UTC.
7/ The X user ID is much more interesting than the displayed handle.
Handles can be renamed.
X user IDs are persistent account identifiers.
Open:
nitter.gq/i/user/208039475772173…
It resolves to:
@TradePools
nitter.gq/TradePools
So the verification payload isn't merely saying "TradePools".
It identifies the actual X account by its numeric user ID.
8/ Now look at the wallet:
0xe83E8EC76783d9f072D847EE69b7e630A8b6C501
That wallet is encoded INSIDE the verification payload.
The same wallet is also present directly in the launch calldata.
And it is the deployer / sender associated with this POOLS launch.
So the structure is effectively:
@TradePools X identity
↓
x_user_id 2080394757721735168
↓
Pools verification token
↓
0xe83E...C501
↓
POOLS launch
↓
0x7Fe377...122a
9/ This is fundamentally different from someone simply launching a fake token called “Trade Pools.”
A spoof can copy:
• name
• ticker
• logo
• website
• typed X handle
But this launch carries a verification payload binding:
TradePools + X user ID + wallet + timestamp
inside the transaction itself.
10/ There's another useful detail.
The second call inside the multicall explicitly contains the POOLS contract:
0x7Fe3778B2520A5868fB8BC16FEa0f33dd9e7122a
and later the verified wallet:
0xe83E8EC76783d9f072D847EE69b7e630A8b6C501
So this isn't a verification blob found in some unrelated transaction.
It's part of the launch flow for this exact CA.
11/ Important technical caveat:
The verification string is shaped as:
base64url(payload).signature
not a normal 3-part JWT:
header.payload.signature
And without Pools.trade's signing secret/public verification method, outsiders cannot independently recompute the signature.
So I am NOT claiming we have independently cryptographically verified Pools' backend signature.
12/ But that doesn't make the evidence meaningless.
For this to be fake, one of the following would need to be true:
A) Pools.trade lets arbitrary users obtain verification tokens claiming someone else's X user ID;
B) its X verification/authentication flow is broken;
C) the verification token itself can be forged;
or
D) Pools.trade intentionally issued a token binding @TradePools to this wallet.
If their verification system works as intended, D is the obvious explanation.
13/ And @TradePools isn't some random account attached to the token.
Pools.trade is the Uniswap Labs launch product for Robinhood Chain:
pools.trade/
Uniswap:
blog.uniswap.org/pools-trade…
Official X:
nitter.gq/TradePools
Robinhood Chain:
docs.robinhood.com/chain/
14/ So my current conclusion:
The on-chain evidence strongly indicates that the wallet which launched
0x7Fe3778B2520A5868fB8BC16FEa0f33dd9e7122a
was authorized through Pools.trade as the real @TradePools X identity.
That's a dramatically stronger claim than “the token has TradePools written in its metadata.”
15/ Is this absolute proof that Uniswap Labs officially endorses $POOLS?
No.
Until @TradePools / Uniswap publicly posts the canonical CA, there is still a distinction between:
“launched by an X-authenticated @TradePools wallet”
and
“officially announced Uniswap/Pools token.”
But based on the on-chain launch data, I think 0x7Fe...122a is very likely the genuine TradePools launch.
Verify it yourself:
TX:
robinhoodchain.blockscout.co…
CA:
robinhoodchain.blockscout.co…
Pools:
pools.trade/
X ID:
nitter.gq/i/user/208039475772173…
Robbin’ Loot is one of the most thematically native projects on Robinhood Chain
The entire concept is built around one simple connection:
Robinhood → Robin Hood → Sherwood Forest → loot
Every $LOOT buy and sell is taxed. Part of the fees goes into the Pot, which uses the accumulated ETH to buy $LOOT from the market and distribute it to randomly selected holders
Smaller holders receive a higher Luck score, so rewards aren’t determined purely by wallet size
The rest of the fees flows into the Pyre, an automated buyback-and-burn mechanism. The more trading volume $LOOT generates, the more rewards can be distributed and the more supply can be permanently removed from circulation
There’s also a 2% max-wallet limit, while the sell tax can dynamically increase when sell pressure rises
Robbin’ Loot isn’t simply deployed on Robinhood Chain — it turns the chain’s name into its brand, lore, and token mechanics
Robinhood Chain becomes a digital Sherwood Forest
Holders are the Merry Men
Trading fees are the toll
Rewards are the shared loot
@RobbinLoot
Capy retweeted
it was another big build week for $Fair
THIS WEEK:
- telegram → feed v2 live
- social → social sourcing module stood up, pushing candidates into the hub
- the shared brain + failure alerts so nothing drops silently
- scouts → public dashboard built (leaderboard, a page per scout, every call with its result), scoring engine rebuilt (v4), agent now reads onchain holder + builder signals on its own
the scout dashboard went from spec → built in a week, on real prod data. every pick, every result, in the open.
NEXT:
- finish the last sourcing setups
- bring the decision stack online → candidate ranking + the orchestrator that runs the full loop, then deep research, memo, and the risk gate
- permissionless scout launch → aimin late June for now
- ship the scout dashboard live + a reviewer agent on evals
- kill bugs, post way more
where it's headed → the whole loop running itself end to end
You get it, sweetheart — this is a trader’s market
There are way too many red flags right now. I don’t want to be bearish, especially with 30% of my net worth still in the market, but I can’t honestly call myself bullish either
Feels like the most reasonable strategy today is to take +30% trades, stay liquid, and stop chasing every new launch too aggressively
By the way, a couple of months ago I tried to get a U.S. visa. I was denied
I made $200k+ in net income last year and used that money to buy an apartment in Georgia. The only purpose of the visa was to see my girlfriend — she has a one-year volunteer contract there
I mean, I would’ve simply spent around $10k over a couple of weeks and left the U.S. But apparently I still wasn’t “good enough” or whatever for a tourist visa approval
Also, the U.S. introduced a visa bond/deposit system. I’d gladly put up that $10–15k
You know, I had all the documents ready. I was prepared to prove every single thing I said, but the consular officer didn’t even look at them.
You understand, my life in Georgia costs me around $2–3k a month, not including rent, since I own my apartment. Why would I want to become an illegal immigrant in the U.S.?
Honestly, I was de-risking through April and May. I’m around 70% in USD now, so the remaining capital I have in the market is relatively low-risk. I’m not bullish — it’s just probability management
I always choose to make less money today if it means having more options for future trades. We’re in an insanely profitable market. I’ve seen too many people blow up their entire deposits because of greed. Fine, I’m okay with selling every token cheap. But in one good market month, my portfolio can hit new ATHs several times, while most of my capital stays safely in USD. Think about it