To what extent can we think of bitcoin as a part of invariant nature say, like the sun?
If an assumption that no one/a few entities on the earth actually can control or break the network whatsoever is correct, can it be?
If changing a crucial line of codes in bitcoin, such as 21 million fixed supply, is just as easy as modifying one of the most important lines in the US constitution, I would say it is not an invariant nature.
"Bitcoin nodes" don't just mean tens of thousands of raspberry pies or hardware but also people.
More precisely, it is bitcoiners' brains with collectively constructed narratives and understandings about Bitcoin from the perspective of social constructionism.
Morality, ethic and virtue, those notional social constructs look absurd at first glance cuz it sounds manipulative, subjective and unessential.
Until you realize that they are the "reality".
The fact that most bachelor's students think they study at university not for learning but for degrees implies that universities contribute to the fixation of the social hierarchy pretty badly.
A sense of guilt when you ignore begging people seems to get worsened partly by a lack of self-confidence: imposter syndrome.
Like "Do I deserve things I own now when there are people like them starving in front of me?".
The idea that women should be hired over men only to reduce the gender gap is completely ridiculous. It simply creates recursive discrimination but achieves nothing.
