God. Family. Tribe. The Word Is The Weapon Of My Religion. Christ or Chaos. Repent and Obey.
Republic of Idaho
Joined November 2019
- Tweets1.1K
- Following1.4K
- Followers138
- Likes9.6K
Grayman retweeted
Every kid needs someone in their corner.
#WayOfTheWarriorKid — Streaming November 25
Grayman retweeted
America, more than any other nation in world history, was shaped by the Christian tradition of spreading the gospel unto all nations.
Join us in celebrating International Religious Freedom Day.
Grayman retweeted
If pastors will not lead their congregations to the polls on Nov 3, then hang a banner over every capital in this land:
“Pagan by permission of the church”
The Word of God is authoritative and sufficient, and Christ is on His throne
Preach all of Christ for all of life
Grayman retweeted
I want to show you something.
A peek into the programming.
What does it mean to be Iranian? Will you reduce the Iranian people to the color of their skin? Are we at war with Iran because Iranians are ”brown”?
Of course not. You understand immediately that “Iranian” identifies something historically and culturally particular and tied to a homeland. Not a skin color.
But in this discussion, you hear “white” and suddenly you only think skin color.
My brother in Christ, if you’re white and reading this, you are white.
Are you more than your skin color?
Of course you are.
You cannot answer, “Well, I'm a Christian and a citizen of heaven.” That’s not what we’re talking about. We’re talking about earthly things. Your heavenly citizenship no more abolishes your earthly peoplehood than it abolishes your family. But such an answer is part of the problem because the implication is either that it doesn't mean anything to be white or that it doesn't matter.
“White” itself is not a nation. Englishmen, Irishmen, Frenchmen, Italians are not one interchangeable people merely because they’re white.
But neither did these peoples cease to possess ancestry because someone classified them all as “white.”
When I say “white” the emphasis is not merely on the color of the skin. I’m talking about descent - about the particular people from whom I came, their history, their memory, their culture, their place.
Race, people, nation, and citizenship are not interchangeable categories. But neither are they unrelated.
White people exist.
European peoples exist.
And those peoples are no more reducible to pigmentation than anyone else.
We’ve been taught to perform that reduction on ourselves.
“Why can’t white Christians have a nation?” Before asking what white, people, or nation even means, many respond:
“The question itself is sinful!”
Why?
If other peoples may remember their ancestors, cherish their inheritance, preserve their culture, love their homeland, and desire continuity between generations, why does that become wicked when European peoples do it?
“The question itself is sinful!”
Stop reducing white identity to the color of our skin.
The elites don't want you to know this, white boy, but you can just remember who you are.
Deprogram.
Grayman retweeted
Today in Coeur d’Alene, Democratic pro-Abortion women marched downtown in support of Prop 1, and they were met with HEAVY resistance.
Every street corner was lined with Pro-Life Activists, and Catholics praying the Rosary.
The number of women marching totaled around only 60. 🤣
Grayman retweeted
Heading into the midterms, I plan to drop a post a day up to the election offering my perspective on the MAGA movement. Subsequent posts will have pictures and personal stories with Republican party leadership and myself. But this initial post will set the tone.
What is a conservative: Someone who believes in less government programs, regulation, and handouts; strong military/police, the Constitution, and one nation under God.
What is a Republican: Someone who supports the Republican party believing it will lead to conservative policies.
What is MAGA: Someone who believes liberals, progressives, and socialists seek to replace conservatives and their way of life. Someone who believes the establishment needs aggressive reform; a belief that we must fight, fight, fight!
We believe Hillary Clinton when she spoke for the liberal movement last year and said, “White men, of a certain persuasion, a certain religion, a certain point of view, a certain ideology, is just doing such damage to what we should be aiming for.”
She is talking about me. She is talking about US. They are threatened by a vision of America led by strong MEN.
When I was in the Marine Corps, I truly was an independent. Apolitical. But at a certain point, when you look around America and find yourself surrounded, you either make compromises… or fight back.
President Trump epitomizes that fight; No other mortal human would still be standing after the barrage of attacks on reputation, finances, family, and life. That hate would have destroyed me. But he’s still standing, the ultimate champion. A generational leader.
Secretary Hegseth is the target of the establishment’s scorn, because he epitomizes the biggest threat – which above else – is strong men of a certain persuasion.
I am blessed to serve under the President and the Secretary of War for two more years. There is still so much work to be done under their leadership. But beyond the next two years, I believe their leadership will carry on. They are showing us how to fight progressive liberalism for a generation.
Screenshot this: I want to be clear who I am… a warrior. A strong man who will fight for conservative values until the left takes power and puts me back in jail. Vote Republican.
Grayman retweeted
The worst mistake patriarchy ever made was protecting women.
They should have sent women to war. Sent them to the mines. Let them see what war actually looks like.
Only the rich had freedom, education, and a voice. And rich women had it too. Their daughters had tutors, private schools, maids, dresses. No oppression. Just privilege.
If all men were so free and educated, why were they dying like dogs?
Why were MEN the laborers?
Why were MEN the farmers who couldn't read?
Why were MEN the miners dead at 30 with black lungs?
Why were MEN the soldiers blown apart in trenches?
If they were educated, why weren't they professors?
If they were free, why couldn't they refuse war?
If they had a voice, who heard them scream when they died?
There was NO freedom.
There was NO education.
There was NO voice.
There was only WORK. WAR. Diseases, plagues and DEATH.
That was 95% of men's lives.
What you call oppression was PROTECTION.
Men said: You stay home. You stay safe. I'll go die.
I'll die in the field. I'll die in the mine. I'll die in the war.
Men didn't oppress you. Men shielded you from a world that was killing them every day.
And you were so shielded, you started to think you were oppressed.
Patriarchy didn't oppress women. It protected women so well, women forgot what danger even was.
That's why you talk like this. You never saw the legs, the blood, the graves.
If you had, you'd have some gratitude.
Grayman retweeted
DOUG WILSON : All the justices of the Supreme Court who voted for Roe are now deceased.
They have all appeared before Almighty God, without their robes, and have had to answer for their judicial crime.
Those citizens of Idaho who are pushing us to adopt this travesty (PROP. 1) have not yet died and have not yet appeared before the Judgment Seat. But they are going to.
As soon as the video of this sermon is uploaded, send it to as many Idahoans as you can think of. They need to know that on this coming election day, we are all voting in the presence of God. He is looking straight at us while we do so.
God in Heaven cares what you do this election day.
DOUG WILSON: Idaho's Prop 1 is truly a pig’s breakfast of a law.
Now having said this much, this is an issue where I feel most free to bind your consciences. If you are eligible to vote in Idaho, then you must do so, and you must vote no. And this public stand, from the pulpit, does not mean that Christ Church is now dabbling in politics. This is prophecy, not politics. Idaho is contemplating an expansion of what they think is their right to murder the innocent. This is a moral issue. It is a foundational moral issue. If this is not a moral issue, then there is no such thing as a moral issue.
It is in an entirely different category from an appeal to “vote for Murphy,” simply because Murphy and the pastor are fishing buddies. There used to be a time when candidates from the different political parties inhabited the same moral universe, and it was the part of true wisdom for churches to be very wary of involvement in partisan campaigns. This is no longer the case, and especially not on an issue like this one.
So—no. We are not bringing sectarian religious concerns into the political process. We are telling the political worldlings—politicians and. justices both—that fetal dismemberment is obnoxious to the God who is going to judge every mother’s son of them. All the justices of the Supreme Court who voted for Roe are now deceased. They have all appeared before Almighty God, without their robes, and have had to answer for their judicial crime. Those citizens of Idaho who are pushing us to adopt this travesty have not yet died and have not yet appeared before the Judgment Seat. But they are going to.
Unless providentially hindered, you need to bank your vote against this monstrosity. Vote early, or vote absentee, or vote on election day, but be sure to vote.
On top of that, if at all possible, take two of your friends with you when you go to vote.
Grayman retweeted
Because the Boomer Holy War, otherwise known as the Second World War, is the creation myth, the biblical Genesis, of the political world order we inhabit. History begins in 1945, Year Zero, when the Allied and Axis powers, the cosmic forces of absolute Good and Evil, clashed for dominion over the world.
What we call “Western Values” are the liberal American values of the postwar order: unregulated global capitalism, liberal democracy, individualism, civil rights, and equality. Three generations of men have been indoctrinated into this cult, which is ultimately a secularized heresy of Aristotelian humanist Christianity, repackaged as a universal moral doctrine.
Hitler has assumed the role of Satan, while some grotesque amalgamation of Winston Churchill and Martin Luther King Jr. occupies the throne of Jesus Christ. The Nazis are the defeated legions of Hell, and the Holocaust is the ultimate revelation of Evil against which all subsequent political and moral questions must be judged.
You’re not allowed to have nice things like community, traditional families, immigration restrictions, or any meaningful sense of national, ethnic, racial, or religious identity as a White person because any deviation from the sacred doctrines of the postwar consensus threatens to bring about Holocaust 2. To believe in any of these is to practice heresy. Racism is the ultimate heresy, and White guilt is origin sin, without a path to atonement.
The further removed each generation becomes from 1945, the weaker its attachment to this haphazard, pseudo religious worldview grows. In 13 years, an entire century will have passed since the outbreak of the Second World War.
The moralizing about the Holocaust, the obsessive fixation on stopping identity politics among native Westerners, the relentless insistence on feminism, diversity, and the ideological apparatus of the postwar order will resemble the exhausted dogmas of a dying secular religion whose founding revelation has lost its power over the living.
This is obvious as the materialistic promise of infinite growth and wealth has failed, and mass immigration, diversity and the third world are an existential threat to westerners who have no socioeconomic opportunities and a poor shot at family for formation.
Grayman retweeted
The trouble is, for so many men in evangelical churches today, "giving up all the stuff that's important to them" now also includes giving up their headship.
They are taught to "lay down" their headship for the sake of keeping their feminist wives "happy" while patting themselves on the back for being like Jesus.
In reality they are merely protecting themselves against backlash, something Jesus would never do. Such backlash may come from their wife, or it may come from those who might prefer talk of "headship" in name only, as though it is just an honorary title with no real meaning, a mere box-ticking formality.
In our day, loving your wife the way Ephesians 5 calls you to may require you to be far more sacrificial than you realise, including:
- saying no your wife for her good
- making godly decisions your wife would not make
- dying to your reputation in the eyes of church feminists who would prefer your wife to be more like them
A godly husband who truly loves his wife and seeks her should be willing to be sacrificial in both the expected and the unexpected ways, like being willing to be called unsavoury names for the sake of upholding the practice of Biblical marriage at a time in history in which such a view is tantamount to blasphemy against the gods.
The tell is that whenever they come across something that resembles genuine Biblical patriarchy, the very same people who love to cite Ephesians 5 in order to keep the husbands "in check" soon begin to resemble those who chanted: "Great is Artemis of the Ephesians!" (cf. Acts 19).
In feminist-coded churches, Biblical patriarchy will inevitably cause riots, and like the town clerk in Ephesus, too many pastors today would prefer to maintain the feminist idolatry in order to avoid a disturbance of "the peace".
Grayman retweeted
🚨🚨THE DEMOCRACY FILES, PART 1: THE PLAN 🚨
I am working on gathering all the documents.
Now, here's something to understand about the "democracy" and protest ecosystem: almost nobody knows the 'grand plan' so to speak. They simply agree to play a role.
For example, 99% of people breaking stuff on the streets believe they're doing it out of an organic uprising. They don't see that the police have been ordered to stand down. They don't see that legal services have already been arranged for them. They don't see that foundations are paying for their bonds.
Similarly here, governors aren't participating in a pact to destroy the Constitution. Governors simply have agreed to push back on the Insurrection Act. The effect is the same: the governors end up playing a role in a grander plan.
I call this "shared epistemology" in my book Unelected. Motivations differ, people rarely agree to the big evil supervillain framing, but incentives all converge in the same end goal.
No Kings might not agree to explicitly tear down the Constitution, but they nonetheless work with DSA and will turn out millions of people if the right phone call is put in.
Here is one articulation of the plan - and crucially, since then, they have put many NGOs in their places to execute their proper role at all levels when the time is right.
Many more coming.
Grayman retweeted
THE INVOICE OF FEAR
This Hasan execution debate has exposed something ugly in us. We keep talking about what the islamist enemy might think.
"What if they make him a martyr! What if they use the footage! What if they get angry! What if they hate us more!"
Take this from a GWOT veteran sick of hearing this shit: They already hate us.
That is the part nobody wants to say out loud because it makes the whole ritual look ridiculous. You don't negotiate a wolf out of hunger by lowering your fucking voice.
If fear of terrorist reaction changes how you carry out a lawful sentence, then they are no longer merely your enemy. They are governing you. They own you.
That is real power, isn't it? Not theirs on paper. Theirs over YOU, average American.
And this is the same weakness we carried into the Global War on Terror on your behalf. We went across the world to fight men who understood violence perfectly while we spent twenty years trying to prove to those same men that we were "nice".
Restrictive rules, endless hesitation, leaders promoted for avoiding headlines. Troops asked to close with an enemy while an entire civilization stood behind them whispering, “Be careful how this looks.”
Then we wondered why the war dragged on, and on and on. Where has this weak approach gotten us?
The military gets its people, its authority, its limits, and eventually its courage from the country that sends it. From YOU!
So here is the invoice, America:
>You wanted the sheepdog, but you were embarrassed by his teeth.
>You wanted victory, but recoiled from what victory looks like.
>You wanted the enemy defeated, but remained terrified of offending him.
>You wanted warriors strong enough to kill for you and gentle enough to never disturb your conscience.
That bill eventually came due. It was paid in deployments, amputations, and flag draped coffins. In men and women coming home older than the years they'd lived.
And now, after all of that, I still hear Americans worrying about whether a terrorist might feel inspired by watching another terrorist receive a lawful sentence.
You either think western civilization is superior to theirs or you don't.
A nation that lets its enemies decide which consequences are too frightening to show has already surrendered a piece of sovereignty to them. A big piece.
Power is the rent civilization pays to remain unmolested in a violent world. And fear is what you pay when you refuse the bill.
America, GWOT veterans are pleading with you: wake the hell up. Stop acting like men who already want you dead can be appeased by your fear. You’re not preserving peace. You’re just advertising weakness.
Grayman retweeted
I believe in:
· total depravity (Rom. 3:10-12)
· unconditional election (Eph. 1:4-5)
· limited atonement (John 10:14-15)
· irresistible grace (John 6:44, Rom. 8:30)
· preservation of the saints (John 10:28-29)
When I came to believe these truths, I’d never read behind Calvin or any of the Reformers. I believe these things because the bible teaches them.
Grayman retweeted
LEGAL ALERT: The ATF has issued an open letter with guidance regarding the NFA ruling. You can read it here: atf.gov/media/30961/download
Grayman retweeted
HAPPENING NOW: Secretary Rubio delivers remarks from the Acropolis in Athens, Greece xitter.cf/i/broadcasts/1qxvveavL…
