奶龙tv retweeted
快讯：维吾尔穆斯林对中国平民进行伊斯兰圣战威胁，并扬言要杀光所有中国平民，并在视频结尾时高呼伊斯兰圣战口号Alahu Akbar（真主万岁）。
谴责恶毒的突厥伊斯兰恐怖主义言论！
奶龙tv retweeted
Do you know that when Anatolians claim the Göktürks as their ancestors, they often point to the Orkhon monuments as evidence of their glorious past? Yet they rarely know what is actually written in these inscriptions.
In fact, the Orkhon monuments are like a Wailing Wall for the Göktürks. They are full of accusations that the Chinese enslaved and sought to exterminate them. The inscriptions tell later Turks how much their ancestors suffered under Chinese conquest.
Here are a few passages:
"The Turks surrendered their realm and their laws to the Chinese Emperor."-------East face, lines 8–9
"The sons of the nobles became bondsmen of the Chinese people; their unblemished daughters became serving-women."-------East face, lines 6–8
"If one man among them went astray, they spared neither his clan nor his people—not even those still in the cradle."-------South face, line 5
"The Chinese said, “Let us kill the Turkic people; let us leave them without descendants.” The Turks were going toward extinction."-------East face, line 9
"Turkic people, you are headed for death!"-------East face, line 11
奶龙tv retweeted
姚润昊在正态曲线右端
《恋与深空》、《奇迹暖暖》之父——叠纸创始人姚润昊在东京塔下溜女 m 被扒出来了。
我倒不觉得匪夷所思，相反，就是“这种人”做出市场反应好的女性向作品才是正常的。
很多人是分不清白马王子和白马王子综合征的区别，有个词叫社会化程度不足，现在社会上有大量心智化程度不足的人，简单说，就是理解自己和他人的行为背后存在复杂心理活动的能力不足。
主要表现就是他们的逻辑能力和情景推演能力不足以去让自己 get 到一个行为背后真正的原因，以及预料到某些因素会最终导向的结果，所以他们认知里的一切因果都来自于想象，或者主流价值观，或者文学艺术作品。
这导致他们会刻板地认为：
温柔体贴的人，一定是好人。
有责任感的人，一定不会出轨。
愿意为女性付出的男性，一定尊重女性。
喜欢支配关系的人，一定不懂得尊重别人。
但现实是一个真正尊重女性、理解女性的人，未必符合大众想象中温文尔雅、克己复礼的君子形象。这种传统印象里面的君子形象如果出现在大家身边，千万要小心，不是岳不群就是杀猪盘。
姚润昊搞 sm，只能说太正常，太敬业了，
各位姐妹可以想一想，现实生活中你们讨厌的那种“国男”，是不是大部分看见《恋与深空》，看见《奇迹暖暖》都要喷几句，都要冷嘲热讽几句？但这些男的可能在姚润昊事件涉及的传统价值观这块和姐妹们更“统一战线”，这些男的里面可能反而真的没什么“s”和“dom”。
有一个冷知识是，除了那种不花钱就玩不到的 S，以及花了钱也玩不到的 S以外，大部分 S 和 DOM 都是心思非常敏感细腻，懂女性需求的，而且洞察力和观察力都很强。
这就有一个和常识相悖的点，一个真正擅长扮演 Dom 的人，未必是性格粗暴，反而可能具有很强的情绪感知能力。当然，是否理解别人的情绪和是否在乎别人的情绪也是两码事。
就像姚润昊出不出轨和他爱不爱老婆真的也是两码事。爱一个人、忠诚于一个人、只对一个人产生性欲，是三个不同的概念。
一个人是否爱妻子，与他是否对其他女性产生性欲，并不是互斥关系。一个人可能既深情又滥情，既有责任感又有私欲。人性从来不是非黑即白的。
爱也不是一种能够自动约束全部行为的道德能力。
虽然我从不玩任何乙游，但我相信这 b 人绝对是算尊重女性的，他起码是认可女性有权拥有自己的欲望，且有权为自己的欲望消费的。不然是真的很难做出真正满足女性需求的产品，而且他那个公司搞不了这么成功。
奶龙tv retweeted
I’ll never forget the day a man tried to kill me while I was livestreaming in Rhode Island.
I was coffinboarding along the Blackstone River when I encountered a man who began threatening my life. He told me, “Your ass is canal water,” and “You’re already dead.” He repeatedly demanded that I turn off my camera so he could kill me and throw my body into the canal.
I genuinely believed I was going to die that day. I ended up escaping approximately six miles straight to get away from him. Eventually, I made it back to my car, drove out of Rhode Island, and haven’t returned to the state since.
What makes this story even more disturbing is that under two months earlier, another man had been found dead in the river at the exact same location where this man threatened to kill me and throw my body. Detectives are still investigating that man’s death, trying to determine exactly what happened to him. I was recently on the Rhode Island Channel 10 news for this.
I don’t know whether the two incidents are connected, and I’m not claiming they are. But knowing someone had been found dead in the same place where my life was threatened is something I’ll never forget.
I’m incredibly grateful that I managed to escape that day, because there’s a very real possibility I wouldn’t be here telling this story if I hadn’t.
I haven’t talked about the situation much since, but saw it is going viral here on X, but that the full clip wasn’t shown. Also, the full livestream is available on my Twitch (wenevergetyounger) or YouTube: youtube.com/@henryposton?si=…
This incident happened at the end of a 2.5 hour livestream.
Life is a gift, and I’m grateful I got another chance to experience it.
奶龙tv retweeted
True
After DOGE, Elon came to a conclusion most people missed.
He tried to reform the state from the inside. He failed. And he said it plainly: the government can't fix its own deficit. Nobody in power actually wants to cut. The machine protects itself.
So he drew the only logical conclusion. If the state can't be reformed, there are only two ways this ends.
Either global bankruptcy. Debt keeps compounding, interest payments eat the budget, and the system collapses under its own weight.
Or robots. AI and robotics grow the economy so fast that the debt becomes manageable, and abundance makes the old fights over scarcity irrelevant.
Here's the part almost nobody sees.
For two centuries, capitalism has had a marketing problem. Its gains are real but slow and invisible. 2% growth a year doesn't feel like anything. Your life gets better over 30 years and you never connect it to the system that did it. Meanwhile, the left's promises feel immediate and concrete: a check, a subsidy, a benefit. That's why the left wins on promises even when it can't deliver them. Capitalism produces the wealth, socialism takes the credit.
Robots break that asymmetry.
When productivity doubles in a few years instead of a few decades, people will see it. Things get cheaper, services get better, opportunities appear, in real time. For the first time in history, people will connect capitalism and their rising standard of living directly, almost instantly. The causal chain becomes visible.
And that changes everything politically.
So there are two scenarios.
Scenario one: we stay in the current inertia. No breakthrough, or a breakthrough we regulate to death. The debt wins. Living standards stagnate, then fall. A frustrated electorate turns to whoever promises the most, and that pushes toward a hard collectivist left. But collectivism fails, as it always does. And when it fails, the most organized, most disciplined collectivist force left standing isn't the old left. It's radical Islamism. Bankruptcy, then communism, then something worse.
Scenario two: robots win. Abundance arrives, and it arrives visibly. The link between free enterprise and prosperity becomes obvious to everyone. And this is the key point: it becomes obvious to everyone, including the minorities the left was counting on. Because their long-term incentive is the same as everyone else's. A kid in the suburbs gains infinitely more from a booming, abundant West than from a bankrupt state handing out promises it can't keep. Abundance is the most powerful integration machine ever built.
That's the Western renaissance.
The West doesn't need to win the culture war by arguing. It needs to win it by delivering. And for the first time, it has the technology to deliver fast enough for people to notice.
The race isn't left vs right anymore. It's robots vs bankruptcy.
奶龙tv retweeted
看阴法唐中将戳穿中共谎言——1962放弃藏南地区是补给问题？
2005年，83岁的中将阴法唐接受凤凰卫视采访，曾详细谈过当年的对印自卫反击，以及放弃藏南的原因。
但令人啧啧称奇的是，互联网居然到现在还流传着所谓放弃藏南是补给不足问题，是我方地形太差无险可守，是气候导致的大雪封山，不得不撤退。
编造出这种一戳即破的谎言，足见中共自身也知理亏，放弃藏南8万平方公里土地是纯粹的战略失误！
为什么要将已经收回的领土放弃？
阴法唐：
部队当时也存在疑惑，从喜马拉雅山脊向下打，上面是高寒地带，穿棉衣，指挥部要烤火取暖。
越往下气温越高，氧气充足了，呼吸顺畅了，打了大胜仗，心情也欢快的不得了。
正相反，部队撤退时，步步向高处走，上山路不好走，扬起稀薄，心情沉重。
怎么破解呢？
全靠毛泽东的个人威望强压着部队撤退，放弃收回的国土。
放弃收回藏南领土，
理由之一：
希望用和平手段，反对武力解决边界问题。不撤军，收回藏南是给印度口实，并且影响国际观瞻，导致友邦惊诧。
理由之二：
主要战略方向是东南台湾，不是藏南地区。印度不是帝国主义，曾是殖民地国家，不是中国的主要威胁。
理由之三：
认为印度是在美苏怂恿之下出兵，继续处于战争，会让美苏坐收渔利。
理由之四：
1962年在东南有更大规模的军事行动，为了应对台湾的反攻大陆，国光计划，调动了中共朝鲜战争以来最大规模的军队。
有的网民认为撤军是后勤困难，是吗？
阴法唐：
有但不是主要的，主要是上面几条。
第一，西藏已经事先储存了粮食，全国踊跃支援，部队本身就有生产的传统。
有的网民认为主动撤军是守不住？
阴法唐：
完全错误，从地形上看，我们居高临下，易守难攻，更不用说其他因素。
藏南地区百姓对我军态度如何？
阴法唐：
当地百姓一看到我们的长相就说我们是一国的。
战后，我军不仅释放了全部战俘，还将缴获的武器装备全部归还给了印军，这在古今中外战争史上恐怕也是没有先例的。
讲述人：
阴法唐，原中共西藏自治区党委第一书记，原第二炮兵副政委，中将军衔，中央委员，人大常委。
1962年对印自卫反击战，东线藏字419部队政委。