Very important point. There is infinitely more physical evidence of a "genocide" in Gaza than there is for "the holocaust". This is explained by convenient copes - "they burned all the bodies" - so no bodies need be found. And any ash can be said to be burned bodies. (Auschwitz was a synthetic fuel plant, leaving behind thousands of tons of coal ash). It's all based on paper and "confessions". Biggest mass murder in human history, and the keystone evidence is things that are easy to fake, with a complete absence of things difficult to fake. Gaza is the opposite - a preponderance of difficult to fake evidence, where the easy to fake evidence (testimony, documentation) is really treated as a kind of secondary detailing, NOT as establishing evidence (which is how documents and testimony should always be treated).