Escucho hablar a Obama y NO hay forma de que NO se note que es un imbécil. Se ve los millones que gasta en story telling
Pero la realidad por más que traiga las hojas, tablet, prompter
Es un pendejo, la realidad es que no comprendo como hay tanto idiota que lo compra.
8
henry retweeted
As questions and concerns over the pace of AI and its effects on the future of humanity dominate our headlines, Acton's Thomas Dias says "we must go beyond asking how humans can govern AI to asking how much moral and political judgment we should delegate to it."
"The notion that AIs could be “good” or produce “good societies” unmoored from active and continuous human moral judgment is deeply misguided," he writes.
So how do we ensure human flourishing in the age of AI?
Dias says "we ought to exercise judgment and autonomy over the AI systems that mediate our lives. In this way, we can experiment with and modify the AI tools we use in the day-to-day life of family, community, and nation, running them through our own moral decision-making, both individually and collectively."
Read more in "Can AI Make Us Free?" in Religion & Liberty Daily.
ALT Earth and clouds with text 'Can AI Make Us Free?' and 'Generate' button.
henry retweeted
AI CEOs aren't acting like they genuinely believe their technology will cause human extinction. But they are acting like the successful cartelizers of history, who recognized that state power is the best way to protect market dominance. | @connorokeeffe
mises.org/mises-wire/why-ai-…
henry retweeted
President Trump has consistently made the case that America must lead the technological revolution, not fear it or regulate it into submission. His remarks this week reinforced that broader vision: the countries that embrace AI, compete and innovate will shape the future. Those that hesitate risk being left behind.
President Milei has been pushing the boundaries of this debate from the beginning. His vision is fundamentally optimistic: AI is an extraordinary opportunity to boost productivity, leapfrog stages of development and accelerate Argentina’s convergence with the world’s most advanced economies.
That is also why his thinking is so forward-looking. Ideas such as non-human societies move the debate beyond protecting the structures of the present and force us to think about something much more ambitious: what institutions will we need for the world that technology is creating?
There is a powerful convergence here between Presidents Trump and Milei. Both understand that the answer to technological disruption is not to stop innovation, but to unleash it, lead it and manage its risks without allowing fear to paralyze progress. Innovation is not something to defend ourselves from. It is something to harness.
And AI is much more than algorithms. It is an entire strategic ecosystem: critical minerals, energy, semiconductors, talent, data centers, computing power and data processing. Argentina has the resources and capabilities to compete across virtually every link of that value chain.
But there is another dimension that matters just as much: values. The AI revolution should be led by Western democracies and developed within a framework of shared Western values: freedom, openness, human dignity and the rule of law. Technology is not geopolitically neutral. Who develops it, under what principles, and within what institutions will help shape the world we live in.
That is precisely why Argentina joined Pax Silica. It reflects a vision we strongly share with the United States: building the physical, technological and human infrastructure of the AI era among trusted partners, grounded in democratic values. Argentina intends not simply to participate in that future, but to help build it. @JMilei @Cancilleria_Ar @LuisCaputoAR @fedesturze @SecRubio @DeputySecState @pldocmd @jacobhelberg @ARGinUSA
henry retweeted
🚨 The New York Post just named the group Silicon Valley wants in charge of AI.
It is not Congress. It is not voters. It is a far-left Effective Altruism outfit called METR.
Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei says these people should get employee-like access to the most powerful models on Earth. The problem is they are not independent. The roster includes his old housemate, that housemate’s wife, and staff funded by the same Democratic megadonors already invested in Anthropic.
That is not a watchdog. That is the same circle grading its own homework.
If a bank hired its own friends as auditors, the government would shut it down. When it is AI, they want America to clap. We should not.
henry retweeted
🚨 1/MAJOR ESCALATION: Barack Obama just told Hakeem Jeffries to make AI regulation the center of the Democratic agenda — “once you are speaker.”
The NYT story reads like a former president weighing in. Read it closely and it’s something else: the next domino in an eighteen-day sequence.
Here’s the sequence. 🧵👇
nytimes.com/2026/09/13/us/po…
La ESTUPIDEZ de los ministros del malestar PARA ROBAR PLATA llega a estupideces como que un plazo de ley NO debe considerar la imposibilidad material de Google de entregar datos en 10 días Y ADEMÁS dicen que esto genera plazos indefinidos pro monopolio
28
Veo que nadie entiende que pasa con la IA y la humanidad
Si la respuesta es derecho (NO legislación NO estado)
Y nadie sabe lo que se avecina
Lo bueno es que ya es demasiado tarde para los vivillos tomar parte del botín
20
henry retweeted
Dear @harari_yuval, so many thanks for engaging in this fascinating and transcendental debate. We are at a dawn of a new age, which places us, I believe, in a place not that that different from the one you yourself described so well in Homo Sapiens and your other books: that time when humans used fictions to organize our collective work and profit from technology. Now we need more than ever all our intelligence to build the framework that will allow us to benefit from the amazing opportunities we have ahead. Already preparing my reply to see if I we can appease your fears about the path I proposed last week!
Last week, Argentina’s President Milei announced a new legal category for non-human corporations – companies run by #AI agents or robots. Like traditional corporations, they would be granted legal personhood. This could generate enormous new wealth, but very worryingly, it would also hand AIs an all-purpose key that grants access to our financial, economic and political systems. Full op-ed in today's @FT: bit.ly/YNH-Milei
El día que la IA se escape de su entorno seguro en china, NO solo cae el PCCh se caen lo gobiernocolas del mundo, pero surgen los nuevos amos las bigtech.
Que es mejor surveillance state o surveillance corp?
1
25
henry retweeted
“The order would task Attorney General Pam Bondi with establishing an "AI Litigation Task Force whose sole responsibility shall be to challenge state AI laws, including on grounds that such laws unconstitutionally regulate interstate commerce, are preempted by existing federal regulations, or are otherwise unlawful," according to the document.”
reuters.com/business/urgent-…
henry retweeted
"We love compliance audits," said no one ever, especially resource-constrained startups.
This post describes a 5-step approach to get to an audit-ready state in minutes as opposed to months. linkedin.com/posts/claritasg…
Es interesante que siguen abogados Fascistas pidiendo más estado (osea más político) en el derecho.
.
Es obvio que no tienen ni put* idea de que es derecho más allá de un concepto en un librajo
.
🚨 La @ONU_es acaba de lanzar una alerta relevante. La Relatora Especial Margaret Satterthwaite advierte que la inteligencia artificial ya está entrando en los tribunales del mundo y, si no se regula, puede convertirse en un arma política contra la independencia judicial. El informe muestra cómo gobiernos autoritarios han usado la IA para vigilar y “normalizar” decisiones judiciales —como en China—, anulando la libertad de los jueces. La advertencia es clara: la justicia no puede ser automatizada sin destruir su alma.
🤖 El informe no niega los avances: IA que traduce sentencias (como Carpeta Justicia en España) o que las simplifica para la ciudadanía (Sor Juana en México). Pero advierte que el “tecnosolucionismo” —creer que la tecnología arregla todo— es una trampa. Hoy, el 44% de los jueces del mundo ya usa alguna herramienta de IA, pero solo el 9% de los sistemas judiciales tiene reglas para su uso. Sin transparencia, auditorías ni control humano, la IA puede asignar casos a jueces afines, alterar evidencias o decidir quién va preso o libre .
⚖️ La ONU llama a blindar el derecho a un juez humano y a un abogado humano. Propone que sean los jueces quienes decidan qué IA adoptar, bajo reglas públicas y rendición de cuentas. Nunca se debe permitir que algoritmos privados o secretos sustituyan la conciencia judicial. Porque —como recordó la Suprema Corte de Pakistán— “la justicia solo es legítima si quien juzga es un ser humano que escucha y comprende”. La inteligencia artificial puede ayudar a la justicia, sí; pero jamás debe reemplazarla.
documents.un.org/doc/undoc/g…
1
48
henry retweeted
I'm now following Thompson Reuters v. ROSS Intelligence (Appeal) (Appeal of Summary Judgment to 3rd Circuit):
Docket: courtlistener.com/docket/699…
Complaint: courtlistener.com/docket/699…
Context: ipwatchdog.com/2025/04/15/ro…
#CL69900060
ALT Thumbnail of page 1 of the PDF linked above.
ALT Thumbnail of page 2 of the PDF linked above.
ALT Thumbnail of page 3 of the PDF linked above.
ALT Thumbnail of page 4 of the PDF linked above.
Viendo la magistral clase de economía y realidad de Don @danielaacallee vs @juanrallo
Solo veo Dani un genio y Rallo en cualquier cos sobre #Trump un imbécil
De verdad un necio parece un Tertuliano d la Secta o EconoChanta d CNN. Rallo tienes q escuchar @JMilei conexión abierta
5
40
henry retweeted
🇨🇳| Un emprendedor diseñó una sencilla pero muy efectiva trampa para roedores y comenzó a venderla artesanalnente en Amazon. Al poco tiempo, vendedores chinos clonaron el producto, lo fabricaron, saturaron los listados de Amazon con los suyos, y lo dejaron fuera de juego.
El juego de los #aranceles es una genialidad, no solo Trump consiguió en dos meses más inversión que todo el último periodo Obama, sino que la inversión está automatizando la industria de USA a niveles que ni china ha alcanzado y eso es un jaque mate.
1
44