Daniel Geske retweeted
This little fella came to our doors week ago. I don’t know if someone just got rid of him or he really tried to find help. Week of treatment and it’s now tow different cats. He found us on time.
Your support helps us keep doing this
Daniel Geske retweeted
Unfortunately we lost almost 50% of Patreon supporters this year. We cannot cover even rent now. If you can sign up for Cats on Mars Patreon - please do. Even 5-10 a month would help a lot. Thank you !!!
patreon.com/catsonmars_ukrai…
Are we letting Elon collect, count, & report votes again this election? If so, I hope we at least have someone else watching?
Daniel Geske retweeted
Dear MAGA, since you're always asking me, "What laws has Trump violated. Be specific."
HERE IS A COMPREHENSIVE LIST
1) The Principle of Non-refoulement is an international law prohibiting a state from returning a person to a place where they would face a real risk of persecution, torture, or other serious harm.
SEE - 1967 Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees, which the U.S ratified in 1968.
2) The Convention Against Torture (CAT) prohibits the removal of any person to a country where they would more likely than not be subjected to torture.
Signed by the U.S.: April 18, 1988
Ratified by the U.S.: October 21, 1994
Enforced in the U.S.: November 20, 1994
3) The Refugee Act of 1980 prohibits the return of a refugee to a country where their life or freedom would be threatened.
4) INA § 241(b)(3) states that the U.S. cannot remove an alien to a country if it's determines that the alien's life or freedom would be threatened in that country.
5) Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (FARRA) - codified 8 U.S.C. § 1231 - states the U.S can NOT expel, extradite, or otherwise effect the involuntary return of any person to a country in which there are substantial grounds for believing the person would be in danger of being subjected to torture.
6) Article I, Section 4, Clause 1 (Election Clause) by attempting to control federal elections and intimidate State and election officials.
7) Article I, Section 8 - Congress' authority to create and/or abolish government agencies/offices - by creating DOGE via Executive Order and by dismantling government agencies WITHOUT Congressional approval or involvement.
8) Article I, Section 9 , Clause 8 - the Emoluments Clause - prohibits any person holding a government office from accepting any present, emolument , office, or title from any "King, Prince, or foreign State ," without congressional consent.
9) 1st Amendment free speech clause by silencing the scientific community - via Executive Order - and by trying to silence the media by kicking out certain media from the press room and by filing frivolous lawsuits.
10) 5th Amendment for violating due process rights of immigrants. Which is confirmed by the U.S Supreme Court in two separate rulings.
11) 10th Amendment by sending ICE agents into sanctuary cities.
Under Printz v. United State, the Federal government "may neither issue directives requiring the States to address particular problems, nor command the States’ officers, or those of their political subdivisions, to administer or enforce a federal regulatory program." — thus, protecting sanctuary cities.
12) 14th Amendment Section 1 - the birthright citizenship clause - by signing an Executive Order attempting to end the protections of birthright citizenship.
13) 5 USC § 403 by illegally firing 18 Inspectors General's from the Defense Department, State Department, Health and Human Services Department and the Department of Labor.
14) 8 USC § 1373, the courts have ruled that this law cannot compel local law enforcement to act as immigration agents.
15) 18 U.S.C. § 4 – Misprision of Felony, by "having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony" in regards to covering up the Epstein files.
16) 18 U.S. Code § 401 for blatantly ignoring and disobeying an immigration Court ruling, a U.S. District Court ruling, and the U.S. Supreme Court ruling. @realDonaldTrump and this regime have blatantly defied, disobeyed, and ignored FIVE federal court orders, thus far.
17) 18 U.S.C. § 1505 by "willfully withholds, misrepresents, removes from any place, conceals, covers up, destroys, mutilates, alters, or by other means falsifies any documentary material" in regards to the Epstein files.
18) The Posse Comitatus Act by deploying active military armed forces on U.S. soil.
19) The War Powers Resolution Act by NOT consulting with Congress nor meeting the threshold in order to bomb Iran without consulting Congress.
This list does NOT include violations of international laws.
Please please tell me we have someone watching the votes he's allowed to count & report, or he's not involved at all
Daniel Geske retweeted
What I’m about to write is true and very funny. A few years ago; the company that makes Cards Against Humanity bought a piece of land in Texas which sits on the space X campus. On that land they are building a statue explicitly to annoy Elon Musk. 🧵
"Republicans may crash the economy yet again. Here's why it's the Democrats' fault" @DougJBalloon
Daniel Geske retweeted
Anyone who needs a gun to eat cheesecake is a fucking pussy.
I said what I said. 🤷🏽♂️
Daniel Geske retweeted
Fox News is putting Nicki Minaj up telling people to vote red.
Let’s break that down.
Can Nicki Minaj vote? No.
She’s not a U.S. citizen.
Can Nicki Minaj’s husband vote? No, he’s a registered sex offender.
Can Nicki Minaj’s brother vote? No, he’s serving 25 years to life for child sexual assault.
She seems like the perfect spokesperson for MAGA republicans.
Jessup forced two young soldiers to kill a fellow soldier. Instead of standing up like a man and taking responsibility for what he had done, he repeatedly lied and allowed the soldiers to take the fall. He was an immoral coward. So of course some today believe he’s the hero.
Daniel Geske retweeted
On gym attire:
There is an innate fantasy women have that goes like this: I am super duper pretty and everyone notices and loves me for this, but also this attention and power come with zero further implications or downsides
The fantasy is one thing, being frustrated it isn't reality is another
Most girls grow out of this as part of normal development (and you should! it's not realistic), learning that large amounts of attention and affection from, say, your dad, are freely given
....but that same kind of attention from strangers comes with strings attached
Posting bikini pics that get 10M likes means you have a lot of men saving them for...gross reasons
Going to the gym wearing next to nothing is attention grabbing for a reason, and you don't get to decide whose attention it grabs or the nature of that attention
It's a bit of a black pill, and you tend to (or, should) figure it out somewhere in your teens: strange men do not want to adore and dote on you for zero reason
To be clear, negative attention can happen even when you aren't doing something specifically out of the ordinary
Getting catcalled often happens in the most normal outfits - it's just the flip side of being young and pretty
The issue is this has evolved into almost an ideology: rather than recognizing the reality that attention is a double-edged sword, there's an impulse to regulate the attention i.e. "You can only notice me in the ways I want"
You become like the dog meme below, saying "No sexual thoughts, only attention"
Unfortunately for its advocates, this line of thinking is waging war with reality itself
Daniel Geske retweeted
Il punto è che Digger di Alejandro González Iñárritu non è niente di ciò che, negli ultimi mesi, tra trailer e clip, ci è stato raccontato. O almeno: non è solo questo. Non è solo una commedia; sicuramente non è un musical (ma com'è uscita, poi, questa cosa del musical?). E non è nemmeno pura fantapolitica. È una riflessione metanarrativa, che disseziona il linguaggio del cinema e il linguaggio del teatro. E che parla di tanti - tantissimi, anzi - temi attuali. È un film che si affida ai suoi attori, Tom Cruise in primis. E che chiede al pubblico una sola cosa: di aspettare.
Iñárritu si muove contemporaneamente in due direzioni: una che va verso l'esterno, e quindi verso il pubblico, e l'altra che va verso l'interno, e quindi verso il cuore del film. Non c'è quel pressapochismo satirico che c'era, invece, in Don't Look Up (anche qui: è difficile capire da dove sia partita questa idea e chi sia stato il primo a suggerirla). Digger sfugge a qualunque etichetta. E questo è senza ombra di dubbio uno dei suoi maggiori punti di forza. Lo so che la critica si è divisa; lo so che c'è stato chi, in alcuni casi, ne ha quasi approfittato per andare contro Iñárritu e Cruise. Ma proviamo a guardare il quadro più ampio per un secondo.
Il fatto che Digger non lasci indifferenti gli spettatori, né da una parte né dall'altra, è una cosa positiva. Perché significa che ha fatto quello che il cinema, indipendentemente dal giudizio sulla sua qualità, dovrebbe fare sempre: porre delle domande, non dare delle risposte. In più di un momento è arrogante e presuntuoso. Non cerca vie di mezzo, non si adegua, non abbassa il tiro. Esagera, rilancia, insiste.
È oceanico. Denso. Pieno. Complesso. Volutamente eccessivo. E anche questo, se posso, andrebbe visto come un elemento positivo. Perché significa che Iñárritu non si accontenta. Perché la sua idea viene portata avanti fino in fondo. Fino alla rottura. Esorcizzando la mediocrità che sempre più spesso ci circonda. Cruise giganteggia, è ovunque, interpreta due ruoli nello stesso istante: il villain e la guida, il nemico e l'alleato. Dentro Digger c'è tutto. E, in qualche misura, ci siamo anche noi. Andatelo a vedere finché è al cinema.
How is DIGGER supposed to be losing so much money? While not sold out, every showing I've looked at has been about half full. Doesn't seem like that big a flop
Daniel Geske retweeted
it's my birthday! more importantly, one of my favorite little buddies Mr. Peaches is currently in the hospital 😞 for my birthday, I would love nothing more than if you could donate toward his hefty hospital bill so we can give him the best chance. donation links in bio ❤️🩹
When we see The Flash, he should only move at normal speed. None of this "moving really fast" bull.






























