H E A L E R 👳‍♂️

Just a Harmless answer. If everyone were to pick up ahadith and Quran and come to jurisprudencial conclusions by themselves, then we wouldn't have a need for scholars, nor would Madhabs exist. So with regards to the Hadith, The Prophet ﷺ said: "A woman should not travel except with a mahram." (Sahih al-Bukhari 1862; Sahih Muslim 1341) This Hadith establishes the requirement for a Mahram for travels, which includes Hajj. However, the scholars of Fiqh dissect this even further. I won't go into the details. I'll just go to the conclusions. The Maliki and Shafi'i Madhabs establish that a woman can go to Hajj without a Mahram as long as her safety is guaranteed (maybe through a group of women). While the Hanafi and Hanbalis establish that a Mahram is a requirement because the Prophet(PBUH) gave an explicit command, hence, the assurance of her safety isn't enough. Of course, I side with our madhab, the Maliki Madhab on this matter as I see it as the most correct of opinions. However, all 4 madhahibs reach their conclusions using the traditional establishments which is Quran, Hadith, Ijma and Qiyas. So yes, the Hadith still exists and it is from the same deduction of these Hadith and other ones that Imam Malik and Imam Shafi'i reached conclusions of women being able to travel for Hajj without a Mahram, as long as her safety is guaranteed. So if Saudi chooses to review it's framework within what has already been established over a thousand years ago by the Imams of Jurisprudence, then there is no harm in that. So now that I've shared the knowledge, let me call out your bluff in Hausa. Wallahil Adheem, ilimi ba abin wasa bane. Ko yaya kika yi kokarin küshe hadisai, muna da amsa, kuma amsar ba mu muka kirkiro ba, malamai ne shekara dubu da suka wuce suka bada amsar ko wani tambaya da zaki kawo yanzu da manufar küshe hadissan Manzon Allah da suka zo a Bukhari, Muslim, Ibn Majah, Abu Dawuda da sauran Littatafan hadisi. Ki je ki kawo wata tambaya daban, muna nan muna jira. Allah ya ganar da mu.