illusionsMD

New video covering the Minn ICE shooting, reacting to Angrycops take on it, and giving you my own opinion. Give me your own opinions and takes on this in the comments. youtube.com/watch?v=KuTx1YHp…

Yeah okay "michell71078349" Totally normal username with nothing to see here :)

So new really simple idea to help fix the pilot trust issue in Wardogs that would be super easy to implement. When coming up to a bird or getting on a bird, you can see the pilot level. Or maybe a successful number of landings/drop offs during the match. The everyone ALWAYS jumping out with a parachute is such an annoyance right now. But also the trust in pilots is non-existent because anyone can fly at any point. @WARDOGS @Brammflakes

"10 year old games" Lists a game from 2013 that has issues because of it trying to connect to servers that don't exist anymore. As well as secondary issues with the devs poor implementation of dx11. Which then got fixed by the community. That's not a platform issue, that's a dev issue. Then lists manhunt.... You know... That game from FUCKING 2003!!!! 23 FUCKING YEARS AGO. Where are these decade old games that have PLATFORM issues?

Has to lock it because you know you're full of shit lol. 10 years ago? Fucking Skyrim is 15 years old and it boots fine from Steam. Overwatch, Doom reboot, Dark Souls 3 are some of the popular titles from 10 years ago.

Hey maybe, just a thought here, you should attack your POLITICAL OPPONENT on their actual policies. Not what convenient out of context bits that @TheAKGuy has said from his thousands of hours behind a camera. Especially when in context, no one should even care. Your entire Twitter is spitting out ridiculous slop that isn't worth even the time of the unpaid intern you have running your social media page begging for donations. Honestly, your Twitter page right now is the only thing people should need to know to vote against you. It's the best campaign endorsement your competitor could ever get. It shows you as an average dishonest politician who can't even be truthful on their own social media account. You disgrace the country and people you claim to serve by your own actions. Hope it's a landslide.

See but this is wrong. This is why no one can take these things seriously. HE didn't technically kill anyone. But he was involved with others on this case that shot and killed a cop. The law there apparently views it as you're as liable or similarly liable as the others since you were all committing felonies. So you all get the same charges.

Yeeeeah id lock those comments too if I said some insanely dumb shit and instantly got called out on it. So I guess you're unhappy unless black people are able to get away with literal murder, huh? I'd love to know how this is white supremacy though. It's a pretty clear case.

I love that the comments instantly get turned off when confronted with the truth. From what I've read of the case it sounds like Kelver possibly started the the issue, escalated the issue, then crossed the street to escalate it further. If that's true then this isn't self-defense AT ALL. There is no where in the US where you can cause the problem, escalate the problem, then draw a firearm and claim self-defense. You don't have a duty to retreat in a lot of states but you have a duty to not escalate it loool. It doesn't matter what the other person does, the moment you cross the street to confront them your defense claim is just soooo much weaker. Not impossible. But so much worse off. Sounds like this individual should have never been carrying a firearm to begin with.

Graphics in games have been good enough to stop being a focus since like fucking 2014 at least. Well over a decade but instead we have hyper focused on dumb shit like raytracing and now a lot of games are boring, cookie cutter, or just poorly made. But they look pretty :)

The constant changing of language to be bad is wild. At what point will just all words be illegal and morally wrong? Why can't words just continue to be the words they're meant to be.

Using dead soldiers on memorial day to shit on Trump is a choice that someone somewhere made.

Bet this statement hits hard if you're room temp IQ.

Evil to have a place that can directly specialize in helping someone fix a mistake they made. Acting like we are sending everyone there against their will is evil.

Someone explain this to me because from the outside looking in, it looks like a Riot Games employee specifically targeting a content creator because of personal dislike for the creator. Not because of upholding the rules. The general idea I have so far is that the employee banned Trains account because he was queued (in a 5 stack) with someone who was on a smurf and normally a much higher rank. If that's the case then why was only 1 of 4 players in the stack banned? Why not everyone? I really really highly doubt that Riot is banning everyone who knowingly plays with a person on their smurf account. As well as I don't see this done on any other platform. Any other platform I've been on only the Smurf account and POSSIBLY the main account of that smurf gets banned. Not the people they're queued with. So basically he was being "boosted" which is a fucking laughable claim. My limited experience with Valorant had very easily noticable lesser skilled players queued with players of that skill level or higher pretty regularly. What I would consider boosting as well. The issue with policing boosting on any competitive platform is if you enforce it too hard then you kill a good amount of the community. That's why it's usually almost always associated with people offering boosting services. Meaning someone pays you to get them to higher rank, not low ranked friends playing with their higher ranked friends. Now to be fair idk if this specific person was the one who banned Train or is just the one who was reached out to. But uhhh... Threatening to ban another person because you're mad your decision/your companies decision is bad is NOT a good look. As of now this looks like Valorant/Riot Games banning a content creator because someone dislikes the creator and this staff member in the DMs is insanely unprofessional.

Sorry, fucking what?

Can we please stop engaging with this dishonest awful subsection of the gaming community? It's insanely annoying at this point as a massive fan of the original game to be told the combat was ever good at all or a fun aspect to the game. It was a limitation of the time period and the style of the day. The people shitting on the remake because it altered the combat loop from the original aren't real people. They're AI bots or they're people who make their living by shitting on popular things on the internet. Reality is that what made Silent Hill 2 the masterpiece it was, was not the combat. But the story and the world you explored through the game. A remake that stays 100% true to the original and does nothing with the combat loop would not have been as fun or good. That's just SH2 but prettier. We all already played SH2 before and experienced the story. Refreshing the combat loop to make it more engaging for the newer generation and improving on it so that the game itself lives on for another generation of gamers to enjoy. Despite what you weirdo purists that most likely only ever played through it once or watched a YouTube playthrough of it think, it was the right call. And it was a solid remake.

I'm so confused by everyone's hate on this one. It's not complex. I agree for the most part. If you don't play the game or know anything about it and you just follow the hate mob without info then your opinion isn't of value. I don't agree you shouldn't voice it, you do you idgaf. But your opinion holds absolutely 0 weight. Same goes for those who are the anti-hate crowd. Your toxic positivity over everything is how we end up with dog shit titles that we have seen. Some titles deserve all the hate it gets and no level of you sucking the devs dicks is going to change that. Reality is that you should be focused on opinions of value. You want to know what games are worth playing and aren't? Find content creators who are of similar taste in games to your own and get their opinions. People you know. Avoid games journalists because there quite possibly has never been a more useless group of people on Earth. But find reliable sources that have real opinions.

People overdo their hate for this part imo. Firstly, it's impossible for them to do survival horror elements really with Leon anymore. He's a 20+ year vet of dealing with bioweapons. Homie isn't going to be scared of a basic zombie these days lol. And second, other than it being a little bit of a confused mess at some times through the city section, it was fine enough. Serviceable. Didn't take overly long imo. Fun little shooting gallery. Was it a little strong on the fan service? Yeee. But oh well, it didn't take away from the overall experience for me personally and I'm a very long term fan of the series. I think the worst fan service part was battling another Mr X variant tyrant. If Leon had killed him off in a cutscenes, I wouldn't have complained. How what comes next.... The motorcycle section.... God DAMN that was bad. But then we get back into good so I'm not too mad.

Holy shit. Did CNN just get bullied into having something even remotely resembling ethical standards in journalism?!? That's crazy.

That's craaaazzzzyyyyy bro. I think they'd have a case if they started firing shots. Personally would find it entirely justified for the first two people he sprays.