
homerics @showrunnernyc | prev. @columbia @jpmorgan
New York, NY
Joined May 2015
- Tweets3.8K
- Following684
- Followers456
- Likes12.2K
ROMMEL retweeted
so many of the ugc case studies on here fail to mention that the main reason they work is because they are undisclosed ads featuring fake stories by what is essentially an actor…
ROMMEL retweeted
iMessage and Slack can’t handle what every company spends 50% of their time producing: video.
Showrunner can.
We’re grateful to @TIME for naming Stream Ring one of the Best Inventions of 2026 in the Wearable Technology category
Meaningful moment for our small team in New York, and everyone who’s believed in what we’re building. This milestone is yours, too
ROMMEL retweeted
A week ago we hosted an unveiling for @showrunnernyc. We invited our favorite founder-artists and artist-founders into the space for a night of jazz, martinis and magic, sponsored by local spots downtown.
I gave a presentation about our company and product, and the frames on the walls told the story of our journey to this point.
It was a beautiful night, full of the people who have gotten us here. And it marked the beginning of the work I feel we were put on this earth to do.
The best things are candlelit, homegrown, and hand-drawn. They always will be.
Creating slop is easier when you put as little effort as possible into it. It’s also better for our business model of having more slop for you piggies to watch
What’s the best mobile writing app? Apple notes just isn’t cutting it for brain dumps and it’s impossible to find old fragments
Whatever black magic @tylerangert put into @angles_hq seriously amazed me!
I’ve been on tour photographing bands over the years and I never had 1) an easy way to automatically aggregate all of my photos and 2) visualize them physically by where I shot them.
This is crazy!!
ROMMEL retweeted
Running the @nycmarathon on Nov. 1? Windmill wants to sponsor you!
Running NYC was one of the best days of my life, and I want to help make it one of yours too.
We’re sponsoring 3 people in tech running it this year.
You’ll get:
→ Race day shoes of your choice, customized with the @trywindmill logo
→ A pro photographer on race day + a feature on Windmill’s socials
To enter you must:
→ Work in tech (bonus points for HR)
→ Already have a NYC Marathon entry
→ Like this post + comment your favorite running shoe
→ Fundraising for a charity? Drop your link too
→ Bonus entries if you retweet
We’ll pick 3 runners & notify them by Oct. 12th.
And even if you don’t win, I’ll make a few donations to fundraising links in the replies ❤️
ROMMEL retweeted
Two hours ago, Afterimage signed a contract filling (likely) our last open slot for 2026.
So it felt like a good time ship our new site and share some reflections.
Every so often a creative asks for advice - I wrote this addressed to them.
1. PICKING. It’s obvious that a VC’s job is to be good at picking. But as a creative professional, you should treat picking as a similarly foundational craft. At Afterimage, we view the ceiling of our work as highly limited by the quality of the raw ingredients we’re working with, like a chef might. We, thus, try to be obsessive about attracting the types of people we’d want to work with, repelling the one we wouldn’t, and improving our judgement of what makes a company a good fit for our style and process. It’s easy to get sucked into the "work" itself day to day (the writing, concepting, producing) but when the work's quality is limited by the quality of your collaborators, it's worth being quite aggressive about this.
2. DOGFOOD. I am shocked by how bad the brand and comms are for people who sell brand and comms as a service. How can you look a company in the eye and tell them you’ll help them feel fresh and different if you feel the same as all your peers?
3. IN YOUR WAY. A hugely common misconception (IMO) is that the perfect client is one who will “get out of your way” to let you — the genius — do your brilliant art. While this is certainly better than an actively bad client, I find this worldview be a quite limited (and a bit sad). At Afterimage, our bar for a client is someone can’t help but get IN our way with their feedback and ideas. We seek clients who hold incredibly strong opinions, will share them all with us, and make our work more specific and memorable. When Afterimage was an early idea, a friend suggested we demand “creative control” from startups; even if it were ever viable, that is simply not the spirit through which I view this work. I view every project as a collaboration - we bring our sensibility to it, but it’s like when one artist is featured on another’s. It's fun *because* you get to hear them adapt to the particular beat and style.
4. ANTI CLIENTS. It can be helpful to articulate (loudly) the types of projects that you wouldn’t be interested. Our example: Afterimage probably is not a good fit to work with Clay. We say this on calls all the time. Not because Clay doesn’t do great brand work. They do! That’s the point. They have their machine running and mostly need people to execute at a high-level. Our special sauce is doing more foundational brand work, what we sometimes call “brand expansion through a campaign”, something slightly closer to 0→1 than pure execution. Articulating what work we *wouldn’t* work on, to ourselves and others, helps everyone align on our values and approach.
5. YOUR FLOOR. I believe in caring as much about your floor as much as your ceiling. Funnily enough, I am almost more proud of how good the “worst” Afterimage project is than I am by how good our “best” is. There are simply no projects that we phone in, no projects we do for money that we don’t share publicly (a lot of agencies do this). Often I’ll see a company put out some really beautiful client campaign, I’ll get excited and follow them, and then a week later they share a mindless founder to camera thing. I view our “floor” as a promise we make to anyone who might work with us. You don’t have to worry which version of us you’re getting.
6. DIFFICULT IS SCARCE. There are a bunch of small things I’ve gotten better at this year, but the biggest leap I’ve taken in my process is learning how to identify a gut feeling of “this is gonna be a difficult one…” as a deeply positive creative signal to lean into. When we pitched doing a whole video with stop motion (with no experience in the medium) or pitched doing a video with a cow (where? how?) I knew they’d be difficult to pull off. But almost without fail those difficult ideas are the ones that cut through. The logic, in hindsight, is very simple. Doing difficult things (well) will always be a scarce. “Now more than ever” this is true. As certain things get easier, seek out what remains difficult (eg handmade, in the world). There will always be a market for people willing to do difficult things. I learned this from watching @cyrusduff_ work.
I am more optimistic today than I was earlier this year that Afterimage can be a flexible container for the evolving interests of me, Cyrus, and our core group of collaborators.
I don't know exactly what that adds up to, but I don't think it's something that exists today. It feels like there should be a company of creative professionals & artists, sitting unapologetically in the tech industry, who are uncompromising in the bar for what they produce. Hope to prove out what this might feel like the rest of this year and in 2027.
In 2026, Afterimage has shipped brand campaigns for @cursor_ai, @turbopuffer, @reve, @every, @pierrecomputer, @avec, @vorihq & more coming soon.
This is a lot of work floating around. So we thought we’d put it in one place.
Our new site, now live ➡️ afterimage.id
Close ups close ups close ups
We designed the best interface for a small team working with agents.
- Agents produce: output.
- Humans produce: feedback.
So, we built a messenger that makes it easy to feedback, and quick to hand off.
From anywhere.
- Voice-first, async friendly.
- Powerful search, beautiful apps.
You work from the chat, with everything at your fingertips.
ROMMEL retweeted
We designed the best interface for a small team working with agents.
- Agents produce: output.
- Humans produce: feedback.
So, we built a messenger that makes it easy to feedback, and quick to hand off.
From anywhere.
- Voice-first, async friendly.
- Powerful search, beautiful apps.
You work from the chat, with everything at your fingertips.
What's the best capture surface for daily visual fragments/inspirations/ideas? My camera roll doesn't really cut it. Are.na app? Milanote? Something else?
ROMMEL retweeted
‘No new interfaces’ is ludicrous.
• Not choosing an interface IS choosing an interface.
• All these assistants launching in iMessage and Slack are choosing an interface that was designed for a world BEFORE LLMs.
• When I’m using them, I don’t feel handicapped by the model. I feel handicapped by the app.
• A technology is only as good as its container. Change the container and the same intelligence can do 100x more for you.
• We need better containers. Better rooms for using intelligence. Anyone suggesting otherwise needs to go find an imagination.
• This is a creative industry. Let’s fucking create.
ROMMEL retweeted
Every guest at the Showrunner unveiling gets a personalized invitation, built with Astra from a photo of my desk.
Great directors are once again becoming the main draw for audiences because of the high trust they’ve earned from them (Nolan/The Odyssey, Coogler/Sinners).
If I were building a new movie studio, I’d act like a label and sign next generation directors with bold visions (Barker, Parsons, Ullom), back their next 5 movies up to a certain budget size (with option to raise additional capital for more ambitious projects), split IP ownership, give them broad creative control, and build a studio brand off our taste in filmmakers we sign and gain audience trust from the freedom we give them.
I’d also take a page out of the Sundance Institute and create an in-house fellowship program to develop new voices we find online and connect it to a micro-budget fund that finances a handful of shorts from each filmmaker we’d post on YouTube free for everyone to watch to grow their audience, and treat the revenue loss as R&D for a future pipeline of filmmakers we’d hopefully want to sign.
I’d probably have a branded division to rep our filmmakers in the commercial space and offshoot some of the financial risk of the studio by producing those jobs in-house and taking agency/prod co fees off the top.
And I’d have half the marketing team be uniquely focused on growing the personal brands of each filmmaker we’d sign because the entire model relies on their ability to become household names.
I left traditional Hollywood years ago because I care more about the hours we spend consuming media online every day than the one movie you see a month, but I love movies and if I ever came back it would probably look something like that.


















