James L. Nuzzo, PhD

Hi everyone - Donations for my new research project on childhood sex differences in muscle strength are greatly appreciated. Please share the link far and wide. RTs are much appreciated. Thank you for your support! gofund.me/a6d4a2a3

This Weekly Roundup contains links to the most important articles that I read over the past seven days, including articles on men's health, sex/gender debates, the American Psychological Association, and Australia's Online Safety Act. Featuring: @SwipeWright @hannahspierMD @JohnHumphreys99 @BrienLlew @CollegeFix @MattLamb22 @DavidMaywald @JasonStrecker @aus4science @LisaBritton @MikeNayna @NAffects and more. Check it out! jameslnuzzo.substack.com/p/w…

The Lancet has just published a special issue on men's health. But don't get too excited. Below is the editorial that introduces the issue. It's the same old intersectional / critical theory drivel.

At least The Lancet is being honest. Their climate alarmism didn't work, so they have changed strategies. And you'll never guess what their new secret weapon is? Feminism! 🤪 "The Lancet Countdown on health and climate change celebrated its tenth anniversary this week. The Countdown was preceded by two Lancet Commissions that sought to mobilise multiple disciplines within universities to address the climate crisis. The first Commission, in 2009, identified climate change as the greatest threat to global health this century. The second Commission, in 2025, took a different approach, describing climate change as the greatest opportunity for global health in the 21st century. The switch from threat to opportunity was deliberate. We wanted to instil a sense of agency in the health community about what they could reasonably achieve. Instead of painting a doomsday scenario, we wanted to excite readers about the co-benefits that would follow from acting to mitigate and adapt to global heating." .... "Beyond a more promising attitude, we in the climate and health community might consider joining forces with other civil society movements. In Feminism for a World on Fire (2026), Natasha Walter points to “a growing chasm between the airy rhetoric of mainstream feminism and the deep crises that so many women are experiencing”. Feminism has taken a wrong turn, she suggests, associating itself more with individual advancement than collective change. Walter writes that “We need narratives that focus less on how I win on my own, and more on how we thrive together.” “Aspiration feminism” has turned “feminism from a political project into a self-help programme”. Her answer is to reconnect women to their environments. Her manifesto is a forceful call to action: “When heat rises, so does male violence. When droughts hit and crops fail, girls eat less than boys do. When conflicts arise over increasingly scarce resources, women suffer. The ecological crisis is amplifying every threat to women.” Walter makes a plea for feminism to ally itself with climate activism. Turn this proposition around. The climate movement might do more to ally itself with other social movements on which its success will depend—against inequality, racism, and nuclear conflict. The tenth anniversary of The Lancet Countdown is an opportunity to rethink the future in the face of an insidious, dangerous, and growing opposition."

Thanks for the opportunity to reshare my original post.

The timeline of increased contributions from China to the United Nations seems to correlate with the timeline of the United Nations' increased ideological adherence to communism / critical theory / intersectionality.

Judgment Day for the American Psychological Association @donoharm donoharmmedicine.org/2026/10…