jeramye (@jeramye) header
jeramye (@jeramye) profile picture
Springville, AL
Joined March 2009
Photo by jeramye (@jeramye)Photo by jeramye (@jeramye)Photo by jeramye (@jeramye)Photo by jeramye (@jeramye)Photo by jeramye (@jeramye)Photo by jeramye (@jeramye)Photo by jeramye (@jeramye)Photo by jeramye (@jeramye)Photo by jeramye (@jeramye)Photo by jeramye (@jeramye)
“Why do the noobs hate AI so much” Example # 5,732,886
Spotify just announced a feature that could either save the music industry or destroy it. Starting as early as Q1 2027, Spotify Premium subscribers will be able to use AI to transform any participating artist’s song into a completely different version. Turn a folk ballad into a dance track. Make a hip-hop song sound acoustic. Generate a cover where one artist’s voice performs another artist’s song. Remix a pop hit into lo-fi study music. Create the version of your favorite song that only existed in your head until now. The remixes will be uploaded directly to Spotify. They’ll appear in playlists. They’ll count toward the original song’s chart position. And most importantly the original artist will earn royalties every time someone listens to a fan-created remix of their work. Spotify has already signed a landmark licensing deal with Universal Music Group the world’s largest record label. Negotiations with Sony Music and Warner Music are ongoing. The feature will cost an additional $4–$5/month on top of Spotify Premium. And analysts project 7–8% of American subscribers will adopt it by 2028. This is not Suno or Udio generating music from text prompts. This is fans remixing real songs by real artists with the artists’ permission, on the world’s largest streaming platform, with royalties flowing back to the creators. A music industry analyst who’s covered streaming economics for 15 years told her team something after reading the licensing agreement that reframed how she understood the future of recorded music. “Spotify just turned 640 million listeners into 640 million potential remixers. The question isn’t whether people will use it they will. The question is whether paying artists for fan remixes solves the economics of streaming or creates a world where the original recording is worth less than the infinite remixes generated from it.” Here’s what Spotify’s AI remix feature actually is, who wins, who loses, and why this might be the most consequential decision in the music industry since the launch of streaming itself 🧵
62
jeramye retweeted
This is paranoia. I live in a super-left city with super-left friends, and none of them want you dead! The average New Yorker is pretty liberal but also fine with capitalism. Some of them support dumb ideas like rent freezes, and many like immigrants more than some of you, but they aren't reading Marx on the subway. Their bookshelves are filled with classics, and they take trips to Italy to see the Colosseum. They love Western civilization! And Democrats in the rest of the country are far more moderate! In the Senate, we have a Methodist minister from Kansas and a Baptist minister from Georgia. Hakeem Jeffries, the future Speaker of the House, is both a progressive and a hardline supporter of Israel. Are a few Dem politicians kinda cray? Sure, like Darializa "Ban Prisons" Chevalier, but Repubs had the wackiest guy of all LEADING THEIR PARTY! I want the Republican Party to drop the crazy talk because that'll force the Democrats to stay moderate in order to compete for votes. If you let guys like Matt Walsh run coms, you are screwed (and it won't be good for my side). We need more sanity on both sides of the aisle!
160
109
23
1,092
61,465
In a year or so you will not find a politician that’s pro data center. At anyone taking substantial money from AI lobbyist will be unelectable.
So the 41 datacenter moratoria across the country are, I predict, going to go 41-0. In nearly every case it's about 67-80% opposing datacenters. True in California, Ohio, everywhere. Read all the results here: dashboard-production-c2fc.up…
59
We also basically turned our back on every ally and suddenly became besties with Russia. Don’t underestimate the number of actual Reagan Republicans that saw us torching Canada/Western Europe while kissing up to Putin and decided “nope”
Republicans are going to have a terrible night, and the simple reason why is that Trump has put up perhaps the worst *performance* this term of any president in a century or more. Remember that he entered with an actual mandate: the House and Senate, a popular vote victory and a swing-state sweep, and 6-3 Supreme Court. Democrats were afraid enough to vote for mild but real immigration restrictionist legislation in the Laken Riley Act. Everyone wondered how far the "Vibe Shift" would go. Trump managed to turn that into essentially zero durable wins whatsoever. He personally *hates* the very idea of legislation, the notion that he would have to spend time going back and forth with Congress, learning details and making compromises. So he simply didn't do it! He didn't make a compelling case for abolishing the filibuster. He didn't try communicating clearly to the public in support of popular bills to get to 60 votes. He just decided not to do it at all. So they passed an unpopular tax cut, some funding for ICE, and a sop to the crypto industry, and that was basically it. Least productive Congress in decades, due to the tastes of one man. Trump adopted one of the worst macro policies we've ever had: high deficits, high tariffs, and attacks on central bank independence. We managed to pay higher interest rates while still having high trade deficits AND weakening the dollar. Just a total failure. On immigration, perhaps THE signature issue, Trump essentially min-maxxed effectiveness and backlash. Instead of trying to leverage the political moment for new laws and a self-deportation agenda (that is, walling off the economy to remove the benefit of irregular presence in the US), he opted for a maximally aggressive approach. The administration spent attention, funds, legal manpower on stunts like deporting random people to Salvadoran prisons with essentially no due process. ICE and Border Patrol were encouraged to be aggressive and confrontational, which helped contribute to the shooting deaths of American protestors. It turns out, that's extremely unpopular! What about the approach of going after employers? The obvious vector? Trump hated that idea! He repeatedly has said he doesn't want to target businesses (especially farms) that use large amounts of illegal labor. This is just an incomprehensible position. Instead of charging a few dozen businessmen and removing the incentive for millions of illegal workers to be here, you arrest people off the street one by one at the cost of thousands of dollars in manpower per each, while their crying wives and kids post TikToks about it. Upshot on immigration: electoral strength turned into a crippling electoral weakness in exchange for deporting maybe 6% of the illegally present population. The tariffs were a total shitshow. Embarrassing rollout, no underlying theory of action at all. No targeted focus on key industries. Our country tariffed products we can't grow. We tariffed *inputs* of our own valuable exports. The schemes and amounts changed constantly, sending the stock market reeling and presenting scenes of chaos to the world. Trump's messaging throughout has been generationally bad. While facing nearly 2:1 unpopularity, he spends his days posting AI slop, saying he'll rename New Mexico or invade allies, among other bizarre remarks. He brags about a ballroom and a pool repainting while gas hits records. At no point has he ever attempted any kind of message discipline. Then there are the deeply unpopular attacks on rule of law, his "game-recognize-game" pardons for all manner of scammers and criminals, the crypto schemes that he and his family engage in, the evilly conceived and embarrassingly executed legal attacks on Comey, Jerome Powell, and others. With his monthslong stand on NOT releasing the Epstein files, he became maybe the first president ever to stake out a 99-1 issue on the 1% side. That's not even getting into Iran, DOGE, his candidate recruitment choices, or countless other things. Simply put: Trump has managed to royally screw up virtually every single facet of his presidency. It's been undeniable, voters have noticed, and there's really no escape from it. This is what the GOP base chose in early 2024, and this is the world they're living with now. Where they handed the reins of history to a fat, vain, washed-up old man and let him drive.
48
Everyone has their “this is the issue that changed the race” and it’s really a mix of 5/6 things But the TX Gov result feels like a particular shot at data center construction and AI in general. And I think the next few years this issue will be front and center in elections
52
Used to be exit polls. Now we got party ID raw numbers and scores factors like early voting and how NP’s break and none of it makes sense to any avg person so they just take whatever sounds good to them as gospel
Election Days are like going to the nice restaurant you've been looking forward to but all they serve for the first several hours is bean sprouts. There's just not a lot of actual knowledge or nourishment to be gained until they start counting votes.
100
Lord this site is gonna be a hellscape for the next 12 hrs. The data being read 2 completely different ways is gonna troll so many people.
33
Let’s just ignore the part where the AI “teacher” is actually dumb What % of the population enjoys interacting with these things? Can we get an accurate poll on that? Cause this is the biggest turnoff in the world to me personally
Asking my AI teacher how to spell seventeen
77
Doing this interview and bashing the league they played in with the kid sitting RIGHT THERE is an absolute tell about where this is headed. They gonna go through 7 clubs and 10 personal training dudes over the next 4 years. Kid won’t been be 9 yet
The soccer mom speaks. 😂 We really live in the dumbest of times. These people are beyond repair.
1
110
People claim that reading has declined but the average person reads twenty completely fictional screenshotted dialogues a day. (The account I'm QTing consists entirely of fictional ragebait.)
This quoted post is unavailable.
8
10
1
197
12,150
We’re either getting one of 2 possible outcomes - college soccer turns into the actual development pathways for 18-22 yr olds in the US - a proper development pathways is built outside of college soccer and that’s the end of college soccer
Regarding college soccer- why is the NCAA responsible for the development for professional players? Why not put more pressure on US Soccer/MLS/USL/NPSL to do a better job of providing a professional development pathway ?
4
3
521
Your telling me private equity backed i9 Sports which is quite obviously only interested in grabbing market share in youth sports and not one bit interested in player development made a massive blunder that’s gonna viral? Shocker
101
Need new attackers on coach. I know that’s odd to say while holding a 1 goal lead but we’re now toothless
51
This god forsaken site has plunked 4000 of these into my feed today. X either thinks I agree with men like this, or wants me to be enraged and argue with them. Think it’s time for another 6 month timeout
1
1
110
I will wait to see the “why” regarding the woman driving into the youth match in Wichita. I see a lot of speculation that fits what I fear has been coming for some time. It’s increasingly nuts out there. Nothing would shock me anymore
2
155
Me “well no Europe and a new staff, least we won’t be riddled with injuries” - every single Spurs player misses multiple matches before November starts
De Zerbi on Spurs team news: "No Savio, unfortunately Savio on Tuesday before leaving for Marbella felt a muscular problem and we have lost him for some weeks. And Lucas Bergvall he had a problem in Manchester early on in the first chance he created for Dominic Solanke. (contd)
53
Barcola cost a fortune and looked incredible at PSG But so far in this one there are 4 wingers on the pitch and he’s the 4th scariest one
71
Just realized that if we had prime Lucas Moura at the 9 we’d score 2-3 goals a match. 😂
🚨𝐏𝐎𝐒𝐓-𝐌𝐀𝐓𝐂𝐇 𝐀𝐍𝐀𝐋𝐘𝐒𝐈𝐒 🎤@RickySacks, Jason McGovern, @Marcus_Buckland, @_MM_17 🔛 @LastWordOnSpurs 🆚Man Utd ⏰8.30PM 🔔Subscribe: youtube.com/@lastwordonspurs… 🔗YouTube: youtube.com/live/oC5d2uc2Hrc… #THFC| #COYS| #TOTTENHAM | #SPURS | #MUNTOT
56
I hated the initial lineup but to be fair to him it worked specifically bc of United’s weaknesses. He was right there He got it horribly wrong on the subs and waited too long to change it. Was obvious 5 min into the 2nd we needed changed before 60’
Looking v closely to see what RDZ does substitution wise now. He needs to be proactive #COYS
41
😂 Sensesi hilariously slow. Lucky we controlled so much of the match. He got so exposed there
44