Jennie from the block (@jnieblock) header
Jennie from the block (@jnieblock) profile picture

Sucker for great products. Building since 2017 🫡

DeFi
Joined April 2018
Photo by Jennie from the block (@jnieblock)Photo by Jennie from the block (@jnieblock)Photo by Jennie from the block (@jnieblock)Photo by Jennie from the block (@jnieblock)Photo by Jennie from the block (@jnieblock)Photo by Jennie from the block (@jnieblock)Photo by Jennie from the block (@jnieblock)Photo by Jennie from the block (@jnieblock)Photo by Jennie from the block (@jnieblock)
2025 - get hotter - get richer
16
6
93
12,315
Jennie from the block retweeted
Suddenly I really want CLARITY act to pass. Fuck these bankers. Paying 0.01% yields on deposits while lending out holders' money and getting bailed out by tax payers when they fuck up. Seriously, stablecoins isn't how we imagine crypto winning when BTC launched, but banks losing this battle would be awesome.
JUST IN: JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon lashes out at The Clarity Act, says banks are going to fight it and Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong is "full of sh*t" 😳 "We'll fight it. If we lose, we lose. It will be fought." The Bankers are MAD they're losing.
49
41
4
547
41,415
migrate all the tokens to baseline
For the first time ever, a live token is migrating its liquidity to Baseline DEX. @reppo, the most traded token on @Virtuals, is making the move. But why would they leave the DEX they're already on?
4
19
455
Jennie from the block retweeted
Not a good take. DeFi infra today is materially more resilient than in prior cycles (partially also thanks to AI). Also DeFi has improved across the board over the years: - better risk engines + lending market structures - formal verification, audits, bug bounties - better cap management, oracle improvements - automated monitoring and security operations inc. circuit breakers - far better tooling for smart contract security (including AI-assisted analysis) Ironically, a lot of the remaining attack surface now comes from web2-type opsec, which is why many DeFi teams are investing heavily into better processes (inc. SOC2-based), infra hardening, and internal controls. DeFi is constantly evolving, but pretending the industry hasn’t matured significantly or that AI is only a net negative for DeFi security is simply not true. The same AI capabilities attackers use are also increasingly used by security researchers, auditors, and whitehats to strengthen protocols. DeFi Will Win.
PSA: I now consider *all* of DeFi unsafe. Coding agents are superhuman at finding vulnerabilities, and smart contract security is too asymmetric: defenders need to fix every bug while attackers need just one exploit to steal funds.
78
76
10
636
70,316
Jennie from the block retweeted
Had a Jane Street interview in 2013 that still bothers me. It was my 6th round. Final interview. The guy walks in carrying no laptop, no notebook, just a cold brew and what I later realized was a single IKEA tea candle. He writes on the whiteboard: food: $200 rent: $800 utilities: $150 candles: $3,600 family: dying Then he turns around and says, “Optimize.” I laughed because I thought it was a culture-fit bit. He did not laugh. So I said, “Well, obviously you spend less on candles.” He says, “Assume candles are non-discretionary.” Okay. I start building a model. Basic constraint satisfaction. Family survival as a soft penalty. Candles as a state variable. Maybe there’s an arbitrage where you buy wholesale paraffin and convert the $3,600 line item into inventory. He stops me. “You’re thinking like a consultant.” That’s when I knew I was in trouble. He says, “Give me a bid-ask on family dying.” I say, “What?” He says, “You’re long candles, short family. Where do you make markets?” I try to recover. I say the real issue is liquidity: rent and utilities are fixed, food is elastic, candles are emotionally inelastic. Therefore the optimal strategy is to securitize future candle enjoyment and borrow against it. He nods for the first time. Then he asks, “What time do you sell the candles?” I say, “Whenever the market is liquid?” He says, “Be more specific.” I say, “Uh… 10 a.m. Eastern?” For the first time, he smiles. He goes, “Every day?” I say, “Every day.” He says, “In size?” I say, “In size.” He says, “And what do we call that?” I say, “Market manipulation?” The room gets very quiet. He looks disappointed and writes something down. “No. We call it providing liquidity to candle ETFs during the U.S. cash open.” I try to save it. “Right. Of course. The family isn’t dying because we underfunded them. They’re just experiencing temporary price discovery.” He nods again. Then he points back at the board. I had missed it. The utility bill was $150, but candles provide light. You can zero out utilities. I update the budget: food: $200 rent: $800 utilities: $0 candles: $3,750 family: still dying, but now in a more capital-efficient way He says, “How confident are you?” I say, “0.95.” He smiles and circles candles. “0.95 huh?” Then he asks me to estimate how many leveraged longs get liquidated if we dump $3,750 of candles at 10:00:01 every morning for 90 consecutive trading days. Needless to say I did not get the offer.
Jane Street made ~$40B in 2025 with 3,500 employees, a ~2x from the year before. At ~65-70% profit margin, that's $8M profit / employee, the highest for a 1000+ ppl company. High-frequency trading continues to be the most efficient money making engine. I want to share an old story about my Jane Street interview in 2014. Jane Street was known for hiring a lot of math, physics and CS olympiad winners from top universities and putting them through many rounds - including, for trading roles, a gauntlet of mental math. It was my 6th interview and my final round and I recall being asked "What is the next day after today in DD/MM/YYYY where all the digits are unique?" They'd toy with you and say "You can use a pencil and paper, if you want" but you knew that was an instant no. Painstakingly and as quickly as I could, I came to an answer. "How confident are you that this is correct on a 0-1 probability scale?" the interviewer said. "0.95", I blurted out, not fully knowing how to answer that. "Are you sure?" After thinking harder for a few more seconds, I realized I could've flipped the digits around to get a closer date. I gave the interviewer my answer. It was correct. "0.95 huh?" he chuckled. That's when I knew I failed. Note: fwiw, other companies that come close in efficiency are - Tether ($90M+ profit/emp) - Hyperliquid ($80M+ profit/emp) and on revenue: - Valve ($50M/emp) - OnlyFans ($37M/emp) - Craigslist ($14M/emp) - Anthropic ($12M/emp, run rate) - OpenAI ($8M/emp, run rate) For comparison, Nvidia is very efficient at scale and is $4.4M/emp.
353
945
184
15,264
3,838,836
Jennie from the block retweeted
$B is live on ETH Mainnet! ‣ Starting at $39M MCAP ‣ No team/VC allocation ‣ 56% circulating and 44% to liquidity at launch ‣ Every single trade earns Baseline points (details coming) Head over to terminal.baseline.markets/ and start trading.
43
41
12
218
64,028
Jennie from the block retweeted
"so you staked your ETH on the Ethereum blockchain to earn yield?" "yes, Dave" "except you didn't want your capital to be locked up so you actually staked it with a liquid staking protocol called Lido?" "that's correct, Dave" "and Lido gave you a liquid staking receipt token called stETH in return?" "yes, Dave" "and then you didn't think that was enough, so you juiced the yield even further by depositing your stETH receipt tokens into a restaking protocol called Eigenlayer?" "you are correct, Dave" "and now you didn't want to lock up your capital, so you actually restaked with a liquid restaking protocol called KelpDAO who provided you with a liquid restaking receipt token called rsETH?" "you got it, Dave" "and then that was surely not enough juice, so you then deposited your rsETH tokens into a lending protocol called AAVE so that you could open a leveraged looping position that borrows ETH against the rsETH collateral and restakes the ETH into rsETH which is then deposited as collateral, except it turns out rsETH used a cross-chain bridge called LayerZero whose security is held together by a 1/1 toothpick, which was obviously hacked by north koreans causing rsETH to become undercollateralized and now these looping positions are stuck and unprofitable, and everyone is pointing fingers at each other, and also DeFi is a very serious industry" "you are 100% correct, dave" jfc.
401
964
226
7,918
752,405
Jennie from the block retweeted
Since 10/10 Ethena was poorly positioned for what has been a material regime change. In the last few months we have been building out the infrastructure to securely access alternate sources of safe and scalable collateral to better position the business for these periods of downturn. This is an important piece of work which should have been done a long while ago, but now positions USDe backing to experience less rate volatility during periods of suppressed crypto native interest rates. Going forward, once approved by the independent risk committee, USDe will have access to: -Basis on non crypto assets including commodities and equities -Institutional triparty collateralized lending via @coinbase @krakenfx @Anchorage and others -Prime lending across CeFi and @HyperliquidX -Liquid high quality non-tbill RWA exposures Each of the above represent multi-billion capacity opportunities with that will now sit alongside the existing USDe collateral base to improve the product resilience through the cycle.
USDe reserves are evolving: reducing concentration and building resilience across market cycles with a diversified collateral base. Four additions to the collateral backing are detailed below for consideration by the risk committee, each a natural extension of existing Ethena allocations: → Overcollateralised institutional lending → High quality liquid RWAs beyond TBills → Equity & commodity basis exposure → Prime lending Read more below on proposed updates:
73
70
42
734
272,788
Jennie from the block retweeted
Every Defi protocol should have: 1. Circuit breakers for deposit and withdrawals, and possibly other internal operations as well 2. Timelocks for any change 3. Security councils that can shut down protocols immediately We don't need insurance, we need to do start doing the ffcking basics correctly. It's too early for this space to drive without any training wheels. I beg you, sacrifice a tiny bit of UX to gain a lot of peace of mind. The worst possible UX is losing your user's money.
73
86
38
871
187,326
For 2 years, this guy solved problems that actually matters. XYK is not good enough and we need better math for pricing and backing tokens.
1
18
423
Jennie from the block retweeted
Replying to @circle @jerallaire
Circle was asleep while many millions of USDC was swapped via CCTP from Solana to Ethereum for hours from the 9 figure Drift hack during US hours. Value was moved and nothing was done yet again. Comes days after you froze 16+ business hot wallets incompetently which is still being slowly unfrozen. @circle @jerallaire @usdc are bad actors for the industry.
182
377
102
3,564
426,815
Jennie from the block retweeted
bottom
102
80
25
1,229
178,588
Jennie from the block retweeted
We fxxked up. Our dev mistakenly used the wrong access token while deploying GetClaw’s new feature, and now it can fully control our X account. Any engagement with our posts will now count as a command to GetClaw. Until we regain full control, please DO NOT engage with any of our posts, things could get unpredictable... Thank you all for your understanding.
807
96
96
788
462,358
"Maybe it's time for a new incentivization mechanism" ve33, LST are all different band-aid solutions on protocols paying farmers to provide liquidity. When the protocol owns its own liquidity from day one, there's no emissions to misallocate, no gauges to capture, no reverse flywheel to trigger. Look into @BaselineMarkets. cc @PinkBrains_io @DefiIgnas
1
6
1,318
Jennie from the block retweeted
One of my main takeaways from DAS... vaults will be even bigger than you think. Would recommend this episode if you haven't listened already.
Think this is the single best podcast to understand Vaults. My two takeaways: 1) Vaults will scale from $6B to $15B+ this year 2) DeFi and fintech will merge. DeFi is just better financial APIs Big thanks to @sunandr_ and @JohnZettler for doing this.
9
16
8
120
30,495
Jennie from the block retweeted
R.I.P. Balancer
Two new governance proposals are now live on the Balancer forum. They cover tokenomics changes and protocol priorities. Read both: • forum.balancer.fi/t/bip-xxx-… • forum.balancer.fi/t/bip-xxx-…
19
9
1
126
36,644