John Shaplin retweeted
That there are some socialists who, in a moment when we are poised to take major offices nationwide from fascists, are content to instead go against the momentum & convictions of mass struggle and say that itâs âinsufficientâ really feels like its missing the forest for the trees
John Shaplin retweeted
Iran agreed with Saudi Arabia, Turkey and Pakistan the necessity to force Israel out of Gaza, the West Bank, south of Lebanon and Syria.
John Shaplin retweeted
The American Revolution is the clearest example of the selective memory at work.
The Founders are celebrated as visionaries who understood that some conditions make revolution not just permissible but obligatory.
They wrote this down. In detail. In a document that is treated as sacred.
"When a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such government."
Duty.
They used the word duty.
And then built a country that, over the next two and half centuries, made it its business to prevent exactly this principle from being applied by anyone else, anywhere, to any power the United States supported.
The right to revolution is the founding document.
The prevention of revolution is the foreign policy.
Hold both of those in your mind at the same time and tell me what you see.
John Shaplin retweeted
Dr. Ulrike GuĂ©rot (@ulrikeguerot) argues that Europeâs emancipation project was deliberately blocked. U.S. interference after 2004, the Maidan operation, and the refusal of a Eurasian orientation left the continent without strategic capacity. What remains is an oligarchic system that stabilizes itself through war, austerity, and the suppression of dissent, while pretending moral superiority it no longer possesses.
âSo, the Americans basically went to Iraq and then divided Europe. The BRICS countries were founded in 2009. You see the moment of 2011 to 2014 as a moment when Germany wanted to drop Europe but go east, go BRICS, but then was cut off from doing so. I can tell you, out of the EU Commission, that in these years, 2012-13, you would say Iâm doing a conference with the Chinese and Russians, and so the Commission would say no money for this. There was clear interference in doing so. And then came Maidan. In which the Americans interfered in a way that Maidan was the glue to keep Europe west. To basically keep it west and to make it align in this anti-Russian spin. So the geopolitics and the geoeconomics were to keep Germany and keep Europe away from going with China, going with the BRICS, going with Russia, building the pipeline.
I think Europe is in the worst condition today because, whatever you say about the US or China or Russia or Iran or India, at least they have somehow functioning states. So the only way we have is to pretend that we are the best. Thatâs still what we are doing. And because we are the best, all the others are evil. So the Chinese are evil, and our competitors now and Russiaâs anyway evil and the US starts to be evil, and Iran is anyway evil. So we are the good, and the others are evil, which is a very, very non-intelligent position to take.
We are the liberal democracies; we are Atlanticists, a huge consensus, and this consensus is now really breaking up. Itâs breaking up with respect to Israel; you know why. Itâs breaking up because the US is now drawing the red line and basically dividing Europe, trying to divide Europe. Itâs breaking up with respect to Russia; are the Russians really evil? Itâs breaking up with respect to China because the Chinese are basically lifting two-thirds of their population out of poverty and have the best car industry now. You canât basically say that the Chinese are not running a good societal model. And in that respect, Europe is totally lost, and itâs not only lost geo-strategically and socially and economically, but also in mindset. Because the EU doesnât function. I showed you Thomas Fasiâs book. The structures are totally flawed. No democracy, no participation of citizens. The EU is totally incapable of doing the real things, meaning peace in Ukraine and the big things. We canât even build trains from Copenhagen to Rome or from Paris to Budapest, so we can not lift the economic potential.
We need to accept that the system of the EU now is so flawed and there is so much resentment against the EU that, with this system, thereâs just one chance to stabilize it, and that is violence and authoritarianism. And that is what is happening. What we are seeing â these oligarchic policies and this warmongering â basically means stabilizing a system that is now fueled by resentment and has no more consent among citizens. Essentially, most of the European countries now have an oligarchic structure, essentially in four industry pillars. One is armaments, the second is pharmaceuticals, the third is the digital complex, and the fourth is energy. And these are structures in which state money is spent for state goals like climate protection and energy. We need the mint bills or the corona vaccine; we do need to spend state money for the vaccine or armaments. Putin is Hitler, so we need to spend money on armaments or the whole digital complex, digital violations, so we need to spend money on the digital complex, and this is no more competition. This is basically state money flowing to big sections of industry and to organize this because, in a way, itâs protofascism. In the definition of Mussolini, if you have corporate structures where you have a merger and a fusion between the state and the economy, and the state fuels the economy without competition, then itâs no longer a market economy. So itâs basically protofascism in the definition of Mussolini.
Freedom is gone in Europe. Dissident voices are gone, which they are, because they are put on EU sanctions lists. And the problem is that if this should stabilize and Iâm fearful that it will â because itâs not only state money from Italy, France, and so on and so forth, but itâs also EU money on top of it that stabilizes all these oligarchic structures â then thereâs no escape. Every citizen in Europe needs to earn a salary, has a husband, has a wife to feed, or kids, or whatever, so if youâre a school teacher, you canât sneak out; if youâre a professor, you canât sneak out. So the control features are very sublimated and go to the churches, go to the trade unions and go to every sort of civil society part and if youâre not sort of behaving in terms of war with Putin, Corona, digital, whatever climate, because these discourses are now institutionalized also in schools. And so there is no escape for citizens in terms of freedom and freedom of speech, which is a huge problem in Europe now across the European Union.
And this is why thereâs no quick fix. Iâm not standing here to say thereâs a quick fix for Europe. I guess Europe is lost at least for the next 20 years. That the only way is to blame Putin, escalation into nuclear war. Then thereâs destruction, and then at least I am not guilty. Iâm fearful about the future of Europe. Iâm most fearful about this nihilism which is sort of sneaking into society. Thank you for listening.â
The EUâs technocratic project has collapsed into oligarchy and moral pretension. A viable Europe requires a republican reconstruction oriented toward Eurasian cooperation rather than permanent vassalage and war.
John Shaplin retweeted
Iâm grateful that the man who wrote:
âTo dwell in language does not mean to be at the mercy of an interminable discourse and an equally incessant exegesis: it means that what is ultimately at stake in language is the nearness of the kingdomâ
⊠has somewhat of a spine
Agamben proves to be among the only European philosophers with any shred of decency left.
quodlibet.it/giorgio-agambenâŠ
John Shaplin retweeted
Je veux dire haut et fort au pays tout entier et à ceux qui, dans le monde, nous regardent, l'immense satisfaction des Françaises et des Français que vous voyez ici, à l'annonce du fait que c'est Navanethem Pillay qui a obtenu le prix Nobel de la paix.
Cette juriste d'Afrique du Sud a participé à lancer la procédure et a établi pour l'ONU le crime de génocide qui se commet à Gaza.
Depuis 1789, nous défendons partout et tout le temps les droits inaliénables de la personne humaine à vivre, à vivre, à vivre libre, à vivre en harmonie avec son environnement humain et naturel.
John Shaplin retweeted
Nous ne formons quâun seul et unique groupe. Vous avez eu la patience de rester alors que la salle est pleine.
Nous sommes le camp des oubliés, des sans-parole, des humiliés.
Lorsque nous sommes ensemble, notre force rejaillit et nous remplit dâespĂ©rance.
Demain va venir jusque dans nos mains.
John Shaplin retweeted
An Israeli nuclear attack? The zios should remember China's warning:
"I want to tell Israel and the Israeli leaders that if Israel uses a nuclear warhead against any other country, including Iran, it will be the demise of Israel as country."
â Victor Gao
What kind of education are people getting at these Ivy Leagues. It's like a petting zoo for war criminals
The former German Foreign Minister and outgoing President of the UN General Assembly,
Annalena Baerbock (Green Party), will become a professor at Columbia University in New York.
Let me remind you of just a few gems from this beacon of European intellectual thought:
"That's why I say: it is possible to change by 360 degrees â you just have to want to. And President Putin can do it, he can make his own decisions and completely change his course by 360 degrees."
"We must carefully analyze the various methods of conducting this war. Because this is not a war with just tanks, as it was in the 19th century."
"If I promised the people of Ukraine that we would be with them for as long as they need us, I want to keep that promise. It doesn't matter what my German voters think, I want to keep my promise to the people of Ukraine."
"You can deceive yourself, but you cannot deceive us, 1.3 billion people in Europe" (according to Eurostat data, the population in 2023 was 448.8 million, editor's note).
"Today is the moment when we must honestly ask ourselves: what will be the consequences for my country? And also: what will be the consequences for my neighboring country, or for a country that is hundreds of thousands of kilometers away from here? (presumably on the Moon, editor's note)."
So now you can rest assured about the level of education at Columbia University.
So American education is going to even drop further now
John Shaplin retweeted
âWhen a clown moves into a palace, he doesn't become a king. The palace becomes a circus.â
âTurkish proverb
John Shaplin retweeted
BREAKING NEWS: Insiders at the Democratic National Committee leak that Hakeem Jeffries will soon meet with Israeli officials to seek permission to investigate President Trump on a few minor corruption charges if they win the midterms.
John Shaplin retweeted
At the UN for The Hague Group meeting with the man who exposed Gazaâs Gravediggers. @normfinkelstein @orbooks
John Shaplin retweeted
The person youâre quoting claimed we want to be nuked
Which summarizes western âwomenâs rightsâ: our hair hanging from the rubble where our flesh lies in pieces
Youâre all fucking morons with too many freedom fries sticking up your genocidal ****
Iranâs Woman, Life, Freedom movement succeeded to a remarkable extent. Women pushed back the boundaries of compulsory hijab and dress code so dramatically that daily life looks fundamentally different from before the movement.
It is a social and cultural revolution from which there is no going back. As we say in Persian, water thatâs passed through the stream cannot be returned.
John Shaplin retweeted
Dog: I piss on your agri-tech.
The high-tech robot dog thought it was the future, but one hit from the local ram sent it straight back to the past! đđđ„đ€
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
This is an AI video.
textguardai.com/video
John Shaplin retweeted
Over a decade ago, Obamaâs administration, with the help of Saudi Arabia, bombed Yemen to oblivion. A whole entire generation of children grew up in war.
Now the children grew up, joined the Houthis and took control of Yemenâs entire Red Sea Coast, rendering Americaâs most important alternative to the strait of Hormuz useless.
Never say foreign policy doesnât matter again. Youâre about to pay the price for this at the pump and in the grocery store.
John Shaplin retweeted
Lâancien conseiller du DĂ©partement dâĂtat amĂ©ricain đșđž James Carden remet les pendules Ă l'heure :
âLes Tomahawks ne changeront rien.
Pas plus que les HIMARS, Patriot ou F16.
La guerre est perdue.
Et câest lâUkraine, et non pas la Russie qui se trouve au bord du gouffre.â
Et de rajouter :
âLâUkraine attaque ces territoires du Donbass depuis 2014. Les Ukrainiens ne sont pas entiĂšrement sincĂšres. Ils disent vouloir les terres de l'est et le Donbass, mais sans les Russes ethniques qui y vivent. Au cours des 30 derniĂšres annĂ©es, ils ont tout fait pour priver ces personnes de leurs droits.â
Lâaveu qui dĂ©truit trois ans de propagande occidentale.
L'aveu du nettoyage ethnique des ukrainiens russophones par les Nazis hitlériens ukrainiens.
@remi_philiponet
John Shaplin retweeted
đšđšđšâGet Him Out Of There Before He Kills Us Allâ: Sachs Trump Warning
"đšOh, will he kill everybody?
Well, that's an interesting question," not,
đš"Are we in the hands of a madman?"
âŒïžNot one commentary says, "That's a little strange
for the President of the United States
to be talking like that," talking, sorry, like Adolf Hitler.
âŒïžNo, not even a mention that this is a little strange.
Then two days later, when he decides he's not gonna kill everyone, he says,
"Oh, we're close to an agreement,"
and of course, there was no negotiation, period.
John Shaplin retweeted
âIt recycles a familiar vocabulary â sham trials, systematic torture, the targeting of minorities â without sourcing, in the genre that has preceded and accompanied every single regime-change war. Whatever the signatories intended, that is the function it will serve: making the moral case for war.â
The Guardian has published an open letter to Iranâs political prisoners, signed by Angela Davis, Mumia Abu-Jamal, Rashid Khalidi, Robin DG Kelley, Ruth Wilson Gilmore, Judith Butler, Walden Bello, among others.
These are not people to be dismissed lightly. Several have given their lives to the anti-imperialist and Black liberation movements, and one of them is writing from inside a US prison. I take no pleasure in disagreeing with them. But the letter is wrong, and plays an objectively harmful role.
Its central image is the âtwo blades of a scissorsâ: the Islamic Republic on one side, US and Israeli imperialism on the other, with the Iranian people crushed between them. It inserts a symmetry between the worldâs major imperialist power and an anti-imperialist state that has never invaded another country, and which has stood consistently with the oppressed from Palestine to South Africa to Venezuela.
The load-bearing phrase is this: âwe reject the false binary of imperialism and hollow anti-imperialism.â Exactly how âhollowâ is Tehranâs anti-imperialism? đ”âđ«
For four decades, while almost every Arab government made its accommodation with Washington and Tel Aviv, Iran armed, funded and sustained the Palestinian resistance. It refused normalisation when the Abraham Accords put enormous inducements on the table. It has absorbed forty years of sanctions, assassinations of scientists, sabotaged infrastructure, and now an open war of aggression, rather than abandon that position.
The states that normalised are not being bombed. Hollow anti-imperialism is a communiquĂ© and a hashtag. Iranâs anti-imperialism has been measured in the blood of 168 Minab schoolgirls, in the bombing of its hospitals and oil depots.
One can vehemently disagree with aspects of Iranâs domestic politics, but the question at hand is: where do we stand in the global struggle against imperialism? What side of the barricade are we on? Do we support a criminal war of aggression waged by the US and Israel, or we we support the resistance to that war? Do we support genocide in Gaza, or do we support the country that has been the Palestinian resistanceâs most consistent ally for decades?
This letter dissolves the distinction entirely. It asks us to refuse the choice. But in a war of aggression there is no third position available, because only one party benefits from your neutrality â and itâs not the party being bombed.
The letter appears in a British newspaper, six months into a US-Israeli war, at the precise moment when Washington cannot win militarily and needs the political terrain softened. It recycles a familiar vocabulary â sham trials, systematic torture, the targeting of minorities â without sourcing, in the genre that has preceded and accompanied every single regime-change war. Whatever the signatories intended, that is the function it will serve: making the moral case for war.
Angela Davis was imprisoned by a state that told the world she was a terrorist. Mumia Abu-Jamal is imprisoned by that state today. These are people who know exactly what happens when an empire manufactures the moral case for crushing its enemies. They would not have signed, half a century ago, a letter denouncing both blades of the scissors â COINTELPRO on one side and the Black Panther Party on the other.
Progressive and anti-war forces have a duty to support Iran against war, sanctions, regime change plots and destabilisation.






























