Michael S

You don't know Russians. They set a trap. If Griner acted in a female prison the way they expected, the prison exchange would have been much more beneficial for Russai.

Unfortunately, they are, especially after school indoctrination presented as "education"

Tom, this is not the first time you sound hypocritic. It was not me who started using "offensive words". I only count punch. You posted reference to a "speech", not an "act". And I am waiting for you to point to fact of expulsion of British military and vessels by Americans.

Looks like you do not think, at all. Cherry-picking "proves" nothing. "Neutrality" towards the Nazi monsters is unforgivable.

Here is some disclosure. Irish people are known for their compassion and rejection of injustices. That is why it is puzzling to me why your governments position themselves on the wrong side: both during WWII and nowadays, siding with genocidal Arab colonizers of the Jewish land.

The last one was not born in the US. So, according to the "progressive" anti-American approach, she will fit best, as her "presidency" would have been more unlawful.

Hey you, dumbass, I got your "great idea". The best way to fight evil is to claim "neutrality".

"Weapons grade stupidity" ----- Thank you for classifying your nonsense with that headline

The German Central command and SS headquarters were even more valuable sources of information via allied spies. Following your logic, those places were even more useful for the victory over Nazism.

Those witches are so consistently ugly: visibly, mentally, and morally.

No matter what my alleged level of "stupidity" is, you and others from your creed beat me on that department. I never said there were no antisemites among the "elites". I am appalled by the constant Nazi appeasement you and likes have been displaying.

I have no idea what pub you have been yesterday. I see that you are quoting my tweet second time, without any meaningful response. What was that, whiskey or beer?

So far, it is you, unable to find any meaningful argument to defend the nonsense embedded into your smart head, who is sounding like making a "knob of yourself".

Public posture: Strict public neutrality, censorship, and the formal expression of condolences by de Valera on Hitler’s death in 1945 reinforced the appearance of equidistance and were politically useful to Germany as propaganda.

Ireland refused the Allies the use of ports, airfields, or bases on its territory. Another case of semi-allied behavior. The German (and later Japanese) legations remained open in Dublin for most of the war. This allowed some German diplomatic and intelligence presence

"Next in kind"- the highest level of stupidity. Nazis benefitted from semi-allies: In 1938 expelling Brits from Queenstown/Cobh, Berehaven, Lough Swilly. This forced Allied convoys into more exposed routes in the early Battle of the Atlantic. That caused many Nazi "victories".

Once again, having 5 family members giving their lives and 3 being wounded was an example to illustrate the absurdity of "being neutral was more beneficial to defeating the Nazis." And your response kind of "I had family" proves who between two of us demonstrates "crass stupidity

During WWI, up to 1 million German civilians died, even though Germans didn't use kids as human shields. Are you calling the Allied troops "criminals"? Why are Israelis "criminals", not Hamas who first attacked Israeli civilians and then made sure that maximum of their own die?

For the people of the US, it is important that the WWIII never started. WWII was started by the German Nazis and Irishmen in charge of Ireland sympathized with Hitler. Now we have genocide-prone Islamo-Nazis. The Irishmen are in the familiar position.

"David Lloyd George, in 1936, described Hitler" ----- 14 years after leaving his office. Nobody in 1936. But your semi-alliance with Hitler remains a stain, just like Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact is a shame for Russia.