Pinned Tweet
Arrival is one of my favorite movies! It raises so many interested questions about language, culture, biology, and the mind. So I made a video about it! Check it out! 👇
Alien Linguistics — The Science of Arrival youtu.be/lIPi3OiaG3I?si=A1xS… via @YouTube
Research and investment actually operate in the same way, with similar incentive structures. Everyone wants to be first to a good idea, but its really really hard. Only the exceptional manage this, many are first to bad ideas, and many more are bandwagon chasers
I'm giving a talk on the power of language this Thursday (10/22) at 3:30pm (New York time). It's on Zoom, so feel free to join!
Can I just comment on how amazing /bubətɛst/ is? They've swapped the place features of the /d/ and /p/ but retained the voicing features!
My 3yo daughter keeps asking me about which desserts we will eat in "bubatest". While I did not yet research this topic in sufficient detail, I will be in #EMNLP2026 in Budapest (24-25.10 only).
Our lab will have two exciting Oral presentations:
Before man was, the spreadsheet waited for him. The ultimate trade awaiting its ultimate practitioner
Spreadsheets are at least 4,000 years old, btw
datafix.com.au/BASHing/2020-…
#NationalSpreadsheetDay
Humans (across languages), babies, chickens, and now dogs!
If you want to know more about Kiki-Bouba, I made the video to end all videos on this topic (hopefully): youtu.be/tEVy87qwtbc?si=4eeh…
Dogs exhibit the Bouba–Kiki effect
royalsocietypublishing.org/r…
My two year old, who has never seen a Popeye cartoon and is blissfully unaware of his existence, just said "look at me", gutted out her lower jaw, and went agugugug.
Jung spoke of this
I love living in the future
Reminiscent of Babbage's difference engine, which for similar reasons could not actually be built at the time. Machining technology simply was not precise enough
I cannot let a steam engine analogy go by without bringing up John Wilkinson, perhaps the most underappreciated engineer of the Industrial Revolution.
Watt had figured out how to dramatically improve the steam engine, but he spent years struggling to actually manufacture one. The problem was embarrassingly simple: nobody could make a sufficiently round cylinder.
The casting and machining tolerances were atrocious. Watt complained that one 18-inch cylinder was out of round by as much as THREE-EIGHTHS OF AN INCH. Steam leaked past the piston. He tried packing the gaps with cork, oiled rags, paper, and apparently even old hats. Nothing worked particularly well.
Enter John Wilkinson, a British ironmaster whose immediate concern was manufacturing better cannons.
At the time, iron cannons were commonly cast around a core, introducing defects and misalignment that could make the barrels inaccurate or dangerously weak. Wilkinson developed a process for boring cannons from solid castings, and in 1774 patented a vastly improved boring machine.
The key innovation was almost comically mechanical: a massive, rigid boring bar, supported at both ends, that could cut a genuinely straight, circular hole instead of following the irregularities of the casting.
He adapted this technology to Watt's cylinders. By 1776, Matthew Boulton was boasting that Wilkinson had bored a FIFTY-INCH cylinder accurate to within the thickness of an old shilling.
Suddenly, the steam engine was a commercially viable machine.
And the story gets better. Wilkinson became one of Watt's first customers, buying an engine to drive the blast machinery at his own ironworks. The steam engine was now helping manufacture the iron that made more steam engines possible.
I find this whole episode absolutely extraordinary. The Industrial Revolution was, for a critical period, bottlenecked on the ability to make a sufficiently round hole.
We remember Watt, and rightly so. We remember the invention of the steam engine and the subsequent development of thermodynamics. But the man who made the machinery that made the whole thing possible is practically a footnote.
I think we consistently underestimate how much of scientific progress is actually downstream of advances in tooling, measurement, and manufacturing precision. It's not just that technology precedes theory. Sometimes the decisive breakthrough is that someone finally figures out how to build the thing the theorists have been talking about for twenty years.
Anyway, I think John Wilkinson deserves considerably more credit for modern civilization than he gets.
Apparently before algebra people solved simple equations with the most horrifying method you can imagine.
From The Adaptive Decision Maker by Payne, Bettman & Johnson @BayesandBounds
Ryan Rhodes ⚙️🧠 retweeted
My Cognitive Neuroscience of Creativity Lab at Penn State is hiring a fulltime research assistant! Please share and reach out with any questions:
psu.wd1.myworkdayjobs.com/en…
Ryan Rhodes ⚙️🧠 retweeted
there’s something very comforting about the “it’s less of a demand problem, and more of a supply problem” model of social malaise.
the people don’t want slop. they don’t like the romantasy smut. they don’t laugh at the ai generated videos. they’d rather read lit mags and watch arthouse film, and would, were it not for restricted access.
lying just beneath the surface in the american public — there is a dormant desire awaiting sufficient supply. a desire for high caliber art, for cognitively demanding alternatives to scrolling.
Everyone blames screens for the decline of reading.
Nobody blames the consolidated corporate publishing industry that made books pricier, more generic, and harder to find. jacobin.com/2026/10/books-pu…




































