deXyy retweeted
The time you may know something is when it's to late for some cheaters.
xitter.cf/Bananomalie/status/211…
As always, we can not discuss much.
Track could have another meaning ^_^
deXyy retweeted
QTCinderella went and abused the DMCA system to take down all the clips she didnt want the public to see,
So I found every clip and am going to react to them live then upload all of them to youtube :)
Please try to DMCA me QT.
Live now.
So I wanna expand on this, since it pisses me off too: there’s a public cheat that lets you splice your runs (do the best copium you can) and replay them. And not only that, it does a lot more. With the rise of REA (now silently banned by Anthropic) and AI recently, (1/4)
So consider this a heads up: there’s at least one public cheat out there that will get you whatever runs you want; if you’re a good player, hiding it and being clever with it is easy, which would make it even harder to spot... (3/4)
@Hylis1 @Trackmania @Ubisoft, please fix. I know EAC or any other kernel ac is out of reach, but anything small would help. You could even have mods (like in GD) to check and ban suspicious runs from time to time. We love this game Nadeo, please... (4/4)
deXyy retweeted
I grew up in a game where nobody questionned when a wr was made but now look at this. The game is filled with runs that are very probably cheated and we can't do anything about it. Don't trust anybody anymore by default. It all started in may 2021, it's getting worse everyday now
deXyy retweeted
🏆 BIG Trackmania Cup 2026 🏆
10000€ minimum prize pool 💵
19th & 20th of December 2026 🗓️
deXyy retweeted
We have just sent out another wave of VACNet labeling page invites. Recent match quality improvements are the direct result of heroic, handsome and beautiful labelers like yourself. If you have been selected, a VACNet icon will appear in-game. counter-strike.net/vacnet
deXyy retweeted
Asmongold says QTCinderella’s Streamer Award show is RIGGED and reminded everyone that last year he and Adin Ross offered QT $200,000 to any charity she wanted if she provided total backend data for nominations and winners, and she refused
“She knows that if somebody they find to be politically inconvenient or not congruent with the sponsors, if one of those people gets a lot of nominations, they will make an executive decision to cut that person.
You literally had the chance to turn one of the people criticizing you into an idiot and at the same time have $100k donated to charity. It’s a win-win. Why would you not do that? Because you’re doing something wrong. That’s why.”
