Flavs retweeted
I keep thinking about a talk I listened to by @JulianAssange back in 2017 where he warned that one day AI could be used to facilitate the propaganda interests of the powerful by manipulating news media and information in ways that are too subtle for the human mind to notice.
Assange described a future where AI-powered algorithms serve us a customized feed of information based on data collected about our search queries and interests, calculated to appeal to our biases and construct a worldview for us which advances the agendas of those who control the machines.
He explained that sufficiently advanced artificial intelligence systems could arrange this information with more subtlety and complexity than human perception can pick up on, in much the same way a computer can outperform any human brain at a game of chess.
Here’s an excerpt from Assange’s remarks, delivered via video chat at the Meltdown Festival in June 2017:
“What I think is probably the most important development that is happening as far as the fate of human beings is concerned is that we are getting close to the threshold where the traditional propaganda function that is employed by, you know, the BBC, the Daily Mail, etc... can be encapsulated by AI processes.
“Now, if you think about when you’re playing chess, already we’re in a situation where AI can do better than any human chess player. So you can see a certain number of moves ahead. And someone moves a piece onto the board and you go ‘Why did they put that knight there?’ And you start to think what is the intentionality behind it, and you try and look several steps ahead to work out what the intentionality was and then counter it: Okay, they want to manipulate me into moving here so this will happen and so I will lose.
“We take these considerations already when we’re — well, some of us — when we’re reading stories in the press. What is the intentionality of this story? Why is this particular information being pushed to the public and not some other form of information? Who’s the name of the author? What publication is it appearing in? What language? Etc. Well, possibly the reason is because someone wanted to promote a particular agenda, therefore we should read it in a different light.
“But when you have artificial intelligence programs harvesting all the search queries that people have on their phones, all the YouTube videos that human beings have uploaded etc, and it starts to lay out perceptual influence campaigns 20 to 30 moves ahead, this starts to become totally beneath the levels of human perception. And once a computer-augmented organization such as Google is able to engage in influencing human beings 20 to 30 moves ahead, keeping each move beneath the level of human perception, there’s nothing we can do about it, because we can’t see it.”
I keep thinking about these remarks nearly a decade later because this does seem to be the goal. It’s becoming clearer and clearer to everyone that these new technologies are not intended to improve the lives of ordinary people, but to serve the interests of the oligarchs and empire managers who rule our world. That’s why they’re being rammed into existence at breakneck pace despite the obvious fact that they’re making life worse for most people without advancing human quality of life in any meaningful way.
A big part of the agenda seems to be to re-centralize the control of information that was temporarily lost with the advent of the internet. Revolutionary sentiments are rumbling around the world as our species becomes increasingly discontented with the abuses of capitalism and the US-led world order, assisted by humanity’s unprecedented ability to network and share information around the world in real time.
Artificial intelligence’s usefulness in re-centralizing information in ways that can be easily manipulated has already been noted by the Israel lobby.
At an American Jewish Committee event this past June, Santa Clara University’s Maya Ackerman argued that generative AI presents an exciting new opportunity for imposing pro-Israel narratives on public consciousness, because AI companies can be lobbied directly to push pro-Israel narratives since their leaders can control what information people see.
Here’s a transcript of what she said:
“The really cool thing about AI is that while it can become a great ally for our enemies, if we act early it could be exactly the opportunity that we need after missing the boat with social media. AI is now becoming the dominant source of information — the main source of information. People trust AI more than anything else. They trust AI more than social media. They turn to chatbots like ChatGPT and Gemini instead of using Google. And young people use these bots instead of Google in very, very very large numbers. So this is becoming the main source of information.
“And so when I say this, I still find Jewish people being discouraged, they say ‘Oh, but Wikipedia is already so antisemitic and social media is so antisemitic — why bother? The AI just learns from all of this data.’ So, you know, whatever, not much we can do.
“But that’s not true, because over the past two years the AI companies have been moving towards alignment. So instead of algorithms sort of honestly representing what’s in the data, we’re finding that these chatbots and the text to image models are increasingly showing us exactly what the companies want us to see.
“Okay, so it’s becoming intentional. Which means that instead of trying to control the whole world and trying to somehow manage what’s happening in this big blob called Wikipedia and social media, we can go directly to the companies with clear technical and advocacy solutions. For the first time, there is a path to correcting the digital world.”
Anti-Defamation League CEO Jonathan Greenblatt recently confirmed that this was the Israel lobby’s new MO, saying the ADL has been “working with” all the top AI companies and pushing them to into alignment with the pro-Israel agenda.
Speaking at a Jerusalem Post conference last month, Greenblatt said the following:
"So we've been working with the frontier labs — OpenAI, Anthropic, Alphabet the company that runs Gemini, Google, Meta who runs Muse, and others, X, who run Grok—testing their models and using the results to push them to do better."
“Look, we’ve had excellent collaboration with Silicon Valley. These companies want to improve ChatGPT and Claude. We’ve got to help them. So we’ve run the tests and seen where antisemitism shows up and helped them develop strategies to tackle it right in the source code.”
If the Israel lobby manipulators are doing this, then we can assume that all the high-level imperial narrative managers are doing it as well.
In January 2018, Assange tweeted the following:
“The future of humanity is the struggle between humans that control machines and machines that control humans.
“While the internet has brought about a revolution in our ability to educate each other, the consequent democratic explosion has shaken existing establishments to their core. Burgeoning digital super states such as Google, Facebook and their Chinese equivalents, who are integrated with the existing order, have moved to re-establish discourse control. This is not simply a corrective action. Undetectable mass social influence powered by artificial intelligence is an existential threat to humanity.
“While still in its infancy, the geometric nature of this trend is clear. The phenomenon differs from traditional attempts to shape culture and politics by operating at a scale, speed, and increasingly at a subtlety, that appears highly likely to eclipse human counter-measures.
“Nuclear war, climate change or global pandemics are existential threats that we can work through with discussion and thought. Discourse is humanity’s immune system for existential threats. Diseases that infect the immune system are usually fatal. In this case, at a planetary scale.”
Anyway, just some things we should keep in mind as we make our way into this strange new future.
Flavs retweeted
“The final test of freedom is this: Can you remain the same person in praise, in insult, in gain, and in loss?”
- Seneca
Ordered by Emperor Nero to take his own life in 65 AD, the Roman philosopher Seneca faced death with remarkable composure. After opening his veins, he reportedly entered a warm bath as grieving friends and followers gathered around him. The artwork portrays this solemn scene, contrasting Seneca’s calm acceptance of his fate with the sorrow of those witnessing his final moments.
His death reflects a central principle of Stoic philosophy: true strength comes from mastering one’s character rather than controlling external circumstances. Whether confronted with praise, criticism, triumph, suffering, or even death, Seneca believed that inner peace and personal integrity should remain unshaken.
Flavs retweeted
Meet the new boss, same as the old boss.
Michigan's Democratic candidate for Senate Abdul El-Sayed confronted @jamesmatthewsky, telling him he wouldn't answer his questions as he wants "zero" votes in the UK.
Watch the heated exchange between the two.
Watch our live coverage of the US midterms➡️ trib.al/BikRSb2
Michigan's Democratic candidate for Senate Abdul El-Sayed confronted @jamesmatthewsky, telling him he wouldn't answer his questions as he wants "zero" votes in the UK.
Watch the heated exchange between the two.
Watch our live coverage of the US midterms➡️ trib.al/BikRSb2
Flavs retweeted
At what point do we stop focusing on who needs to pay more tax and start asking where all of our tax money is going.
Flavs retweeted
Delighted with my first few weeks at John Lewis. And they said I wouldn't get another job after I left Jaguar's Marketing Department...
Flavs retweeted
🇩🇪 Le président allemand Steinmeier, kippa sur la tête, dénonce l’antisémitisme qui se cache derrière la critique d’Israël.
« La haine des Juifs se déguise en critique d’Israël. Nier son droit à exister, c’est franchir la ligne de l’antisémitisme. »
Des mots clairs !
Flavs retweeted
Before I die, I’m going to eat a bag of unpopped popcorn.
That should make the cremation a little more interesting.
Flavs retweeted
In this alternative reality, the opposition leader who is out of power fleeing into exile, and the father who is in prison are the authoritarians. And the guy who controls all security forces of the state, the electoral system, and largely the media through state subsidies, and who ordered a travel ban on his opponent within seven minutes of being declared the winner of the presidential election after having his former lawyer acting as judge extend the closure of the polls and suspend the counting for two hours is the democratic man representing the will of the people.
Please follow @AOC for more daily comedy and satire.
Yesterday, Brazil showed the world that the will of the people is stronger than the authoritarians who try to suppress it. Congratulations President @LulaOficial and congratulations Brazil.
Flavs retweeted
-Etre Lula.
- Se faire condamner pour corruption.
- Se faire condamner à 12 ans
- Se faire libérer par le STF pour vices de procédure.
-Jamais réellement acquitté lmao.
- Battre Jair Bolsonaro en 2022.
- Jair se fait jeter en taule pour un prétendu coup d'État.
- Le Congrès vote pour réduire sa peine.
- Lula y met son veto.
- 4 ans plus tard, affronter son fils.
- Pendant un débat, menacer de l'enfermer lui aussi s'il perd l'élection.
- Jour des élections
- Ancien avocat privé, désormais juge au STF, prolonge le vote de 2 heures à l'échelle nationale.
- La demande venait de la coalition de Lula elle-même.
- Gagner de 4 millions de voix au second tour sans trace papier.
- Le lendemain, Moraes ordonne au candidat perdant de remettre ses passeports.
- Discours de victoire : « on va réguler les réseaux sociaux »
- « démocratie » lmao
- RIP Brésil
Dictature en place !!!
Flavs retweeted
Timeline in Brazil's election:
1) Polls opened at 8:00 a.m, to close at 5:00 p.m.
2) Left-wing President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva was interviewed at 1:00 p.m., clearly distraught at how the election was unfolding.
3) Supreme Court Justice Cristiano Zanin extended the vote time two additional hours at exactly 4:57 p.m...three(3) minutes before polling was to close. Very important context is that Justice Zanin is President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva's personal attorney. Additionally, it is the first time in Brazil's history that an election has been extended. Additionally, many of the smaller precincts didn't get the message until they were already closed. This heavily, heavily benefited the sitting president as with all leftists, his concentration of voters are in urban areas. Precincts favorable to the president stayed open while they allowed those favorable to the opposition to close before communicating that vote times had been extended.
Certainly nothing sketchy there. 👍
4) Vote publications were halted at 5:20 p.m. and brought back online at 7:00 p.m.
Now where have we seen that before?
5) President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva is declared the winner at 9:10 p.m.
*Nothing to see here folks. Move along, nothing to see here.
Flavs retweeted
Honestly, I couldn't care less about Brazilian politics.
But I find it interesting to note how my former college professors equate democracy with a victory for the left. In other words, if the left loses, it's not democracy.
Homeschool your children.
Flavs retweeted
Yesterday, Lula ostensibly became the first person since Brazil's return to democracy to win a fourth term in office. This is just three weeks after the country elected its most right wing legislature ever.
It was the first time a candidate has lost the first round and gone on to win the presidency, and the first time that turnout in the second round has exceeded turnout in the first.
Also unprecedented was the Supreme Court's last minute extension of voting hours. That decision was made by key Lula ally Alexandre de Moraes, who has now seized the passport of Lula's opponent after imprisoning his predecessor.
British media's response to all of this? Bovine silence. Brazil is a famously corrupt country. Honesty should not be the expectation. It may be that Lula's victory was legitimate: it is certainly not obvious that it was. How will we know if nobody asks the questions?
Remember this disinterest the next time that you hear a British journalist tell you about the importance of their role in 'protecting democracy' and 'speaking truth to power'. They have zero interest in either objective, and we should take zero notice of their words.
Flavs retweeted
RIO DE JANEIRO - Desempenho do Lula
1º turno: 3.693.021 votos
2º turno: 4.565.393 votos
Diferença: +872.372 votos
Abstenção 1º turno: 2.997.846 eleitores (23,32%)
Abstenção 2º turno: 2.780.077 eleitores (21,62%)
Diferença: 217.769 eleitores.
Considerando que Lula tenha ganho 100% dos 217.769 votos, ele ainda conquistou mais 654.603 votos de eleitores que haviam votado em outros candidatos.
Total de votos de Cury, Zema, Caiado e Renan Santos: 707.990 votos.
Destes 707.990 votos, Lula conquistou 654.603, mesmo com Cury, Caiado e Zema declarando apoio ao Flávio Bolsonaro.
Um fenômeno eleitoral esse Lula.
Flavs retweeted
It looks like Brazil is finding out:
You can vote your way into communism, but you can't vote your way out.
Flavs retweeted
Ireland's banned being hugged by your granny.
Scotland's banned mummies.
Wales is going to have to pull off something pretty spectacular...
Flavs retweeted
Look who’s organising the 20 November student protests in the UK.
The Muslim Brotherhood, via Palestine Action and Antifa. These are coordinated groups that want disorder on our streets.
They’re planning to destroy our cities in the name of social justice and climate change, and they’ll demand an end to our military.
Be really careful, everyone. If you have kids at university, keep them home.
Flavs retweeted
Everyone should have their eyes on France right now and ask themselves a question: is the far right really the main threat we should be worried about?
I don’t say this in defence of the coke-fuelled racist morons who masquerade as patriots whilst throwing Nazi salutes at their Antifa rivals.
But politicians, particularly on the left, talk incessantly about the dangers of the far right, while seeming remarkably reluctant to confront the extremism in their own political ranks.
Yet look at what’s happening on the streets of France. Look at what happens when the far left is let off the leash.
It’s clear much of the radical left is fundamentally hostile to Western civilisation and the institutions that sustain it. Capitalism, free markets, private enterprise, private property - all are regarded as obstacles to be dismantled.
And look at the alliances they make. The political left will march alongside groups whose values ought to be anathema to them, provided they share a common enemy. Consider the solidarity between some Greens and Islamists. Politically, they have precious little in common beyond their hostility to aspects of Western society.
And in France, we see the physical manifestation of grievance politics, identity politics and the relentless division of society into oppressors and oppressed. The politics of resentment, envy and anger.
So look at France and ask yourself: do we really want that kind of political anger and disorder flourishing in Britain?
Because the politics of division and grievance are already deeply embedded in our own society.
It’s long overdue that we had a serious debate about the values, freedoms and standards of civilised behaviour we want to preserve.
We should be equally prepared to confront extremism whether it comes from the left or the right, rather than treating one as inherently more dangerous than the other.
And we certainly shouldn’t wait until our own streets are burning before recognising the danger.





























