macaco (✋,🐵,⬇️)

The pf hackathon already has hundreds of submissions and the hardest part rn is figuring out which projects are actually worth paying attention to So I built a simple spreadsheet to evaluate projects mostly based on what the pf team has mentioned as important for winning Current criteria & weights: 1. Unique product (no high-quality alternatives on pf, hard to fork) — 4 2. Product is suitable for streams — 3 3. Team owns ≥10% of supply — 2 4. Team is accumulating tokens (<10% of supply) — 1 5. Build in public activity that attracts attention (regular tweets/streams with avg >2k views) — 2 6. Strong community (active on X) — 2 7. Mentioned in @pumpspotlight — 4 8. @RainsRevenge followed — 1 9. @a1lon9 followed — 1 Max score: 19 I also added: – current mcap – % move needed to reach $10M mcap I’m using $10M mcap as a baseline, as this is the valuation at which the pf team plans to acquire supply Even then, I think some products (like $MIA) will still be undervalued Next step is building a tier list, where the main factors will be: 1. Total score 2. How undervalued the token is relative to that score /|\ I’m still iterating on the weights and possible new criteria, so I’m not sharing the sheet publicly yet If you’d like access, dm me And I’d love to hear feedback on: – what you’d change – what criteria I’m missing – which tickers I should add