UrbanDesign retweeted
Land Value Tax is completely uncontroversial among economists.
Left, Right, and Center.
“yes, duh, this is exactly what we should be doing”
Lots of otherwise reasonable people have all kinds of objections but none of those objections hold up in my experience…and I’ve been participating in these conversations online and in person for 25+ years now.
The economists are right on this one. We should just do this already. Stop making excuses.
UrbanDesign retweeted
The fact that there’s a town in Massachusetts that would rather drink its own sh** than let more people move in tells you everything you need to know about the exclusionary attitudes that created our housing crisis.
UrbanDesign retweeted
#Georgism
The audacity and hypocrisy of NIMBY Boomers to be crying about the lack of 'their grandchildren' really needs to be studied
reddit.com/r/georgism/commen…
UrbanDesign retweeted
Oldest NIMBY fallacy in the book: when a teardown bungalow sells for $1.5M and is replaced with $2M duplexes, affordability has worsened.
But the alternative was a $3M mansion.
UrbanDesign retweeted
People often assume courtyard urbanism means sacrificing density for yards but often courtyard urbanism is denser than the tower approach.
On a common 271.6-acre site basis, the planned development provides 7,218 homes. Our courtyard-block model has estimated capacity for about 16,400 homes: roughly 2.3 times as many. That’s about 60 homes per gross acre versus 27.
Using the same illustrative assumption of 2.5 residents per occupied home, at full occupancy:
Planned development: about 18,000 residents
Courtyard alternative: about 41,000 residents
The ambition is density that supports house-like apartments with fronts and backs, overlooking protected shared gardens, with stairs leading into the courtyard and active streets outside. Building height alone doesn’t tell us how much housing a neighborhood can accommodate. The arrangement of buildings, streets and open space matters enormously.
These are conceptual capacity estimates, not approved homes or a population forecast. Our count assumes 900-sf average homes and 91.5% residential efficiency, and includes about 4,000 equivalents in shoreline- or drainage-review areas. Excluding those groups leaves about 12,400 equivalents, still roughly 71% above the planned program. The schemes also differ in their parks and nonresidential uses, so this is a demonstration of potential, not a like-for-like feasibility verdict.
Replying to @UrbanCourtyard
I was originally going to ask why propose building anything other than towers in a place with the demand San Francisco until I saw your proposal offered more housing than the original. I’m always astonished by how inefficiently they use space here in the US
UrbanDesign retweeted
"Foreign-born workers play an outsized role in the trades in nearly every major metro area of the country, especially in lower-wage trades occupations such as painters, roofers, and construction laborers."
@Harvard_JCHS
jchs.harvard.edu/blog/declin…
UrbanDesign retweeted
Chicago has the largest waterfront surface parking lot in the world
Such a beautiful view when parking your car
UrbanDesign retweeted
Fast buses or free buses; choose one. In the MTA's free bus pilot, speeds dropped 4.3% on the free route.
DSA is selling people on something that has been proven infeasible.
"More than 65 percent of the folks we spoke to identified as regular bus riders, with the most common complaint by far being that the bus is too slow and they get stuck in traffic too much. The bus lanes get blocked."
empire.streetsblog.org/nyc-d…
UrbanDesign retweeted
Me escribe un amigo sobre el gráfico del @ft describiendo el resultado de 112 estudios sobre las leyes de control de alquileres, , apuntando al impacto de las leyes de control de alquileres sobre la movilidad social:
"Los de rojo son los chavales de mi pueblo que tienen que quedarse allí porque en Madrid no se construyen casas y en las que hay se tiene que quedar Maricarmen. No entiendo cómo esto puede ser progresista."
UrbanDesign retweeted
A new piece in the Financial Times created a great visualization of the results from this study.
TL;DR: Rent control helps people whose rents get limited, but it hurts everyone else. It pushes up rents, pushes down new building, and makes cities worse.
It is horrible policy.
UrbanDesign retweeted
Instead of spending $1.7 Trillion on giving everyone a $5000 check, how about we invest in a world class train network?
UrbanDesign retweeted
I don't really understand why we don't pile housing atop of high street buildings. It's just unused space, and it takes nothing away from anyone to give people the option of living above shops.
UrbanDesign retweeted
Just say "no" to IZ
Greater Boston builders say affordable-unit rules stall housing, but Boston won't budge
thecooldown.com/green-busine…
UrbanDesign retweeted
Strange article from Strong Towns on "filtering".
Fundamentally, they do not believe in indirect spillover effects, where adding high-end supply can reduce low-end rents. Instead, we have to intentionally and directly target the low-end.
1/
UrbanDesign retweeted
🚨Massachuestts' Gov. Healey has endorsed @YesOn7_MA.
“Legalize Starter Homes” makes it easier to build smaller, more attainable homes on smaller lots.
“By opening doors to first-time homeowners, we’ll help more young people afford to stay in MA and build their future here.”
UrbanDesign retweeted
The Abundance movement had a lifespan of a fruit fly.
Since writing this book LAST YEAR Ezra Klein has endorsed national rent control, curbs on the growth of heavy industry, and now a sort of forced handicapping of AI capabilities that's right out of Harrison Bergeron.








































