amor fati et memento mori
the abyss
Joined March 2024
- Tweets20.1K
- Following1.4K
- Followers3.2K
- Likes108K
Pinned Tweet
I'm well aware of what the catechism states, but you are making a claim about the interior knowledge and disposition of 500k+ people, which you blatantly do not have. I don't even need to get into an SSPX defense here as you're just wrong on your own premises.
CCC 846 is contingent on two things: knowing the Church is necessary, and refusing her anyway. The knowledge is definitionally an interior act, which, as you surely know, while we can judge that an act is gravely wrong, we must entrust judgment of specific persons to God (per CCC 1861).
Even when the matter is grave, a sin is only mortal with full knowledge and deliberate consent, which are both also interior dispositions...
Ignorance, habituation, coercion and the pressure of circumstances can reduce an individuals culpability (according to CCC 1735). You have literally no access to what any of those people know or their interior dispositions or intentions, and neither does literally anyone else.
Therefore; your claim "we can be sure they're in hell" is not a remotely Orthodox application of CCC 846. It is fundamentally a claim to know hearts, which the Church says we cannot do. I'd also highly recommend since you love pulling out quotes from the catechism, to look up catechism 2477 :). Might be instructive!
Go ahead and reblock me now thanks bye!
Read CCC 846. It states that those who know the church is true but refuse to remain in her "could not be saved." That is as blunt as it can get and it perfectly describes the SSPX. I agree with Our Lady of Fatima that we should pray that God "leads all souls to heaven" but I also believe we should believe the CCC.
Majorian retweeted
Twitter Catholics whenever they touch their penis:
Majorian retweeted
It’s my mum’s 87th birthday. She has no faith in God. Please keep her in your prayers. 🙏
Majorian retweeted
Could've just said "my bad I got too heated" and retract but instead you'll just deflect and run away, which is why people don't respect you.
Majorian retweeted
Let's even say they're wrong about their standing. Being wrong is error, which is not necessarily morally equivalent as knowing refusal, and the Catechism (as I've already pointed out) says error and ignorance can diminish or even remove culpability (1735 & 1860). Your false dilemma of "believe the SSPX and be damned, or leave" leaves out another category of people (which is why your statement is stupid): people who are mistaken in good faith. I hypothesize this is because you repeatedly operate in bad-faith, so you project this behavior on others, but I digress.
And you still haven't answered the question I posed to you initially how can you be certain across the entire group? You can't, and the Catechism says you can't, in CCC 1861. I would again recommend reading CCC 2477.
Could've just said "my bad I got too heated" and retract but instead you'll just deflect and run away, which is why people don't respect you.
Majorian retweeted
When you ask Daily Wire bros "What is a woman" vs when you ask them "What is an American"
Coward got ratioed so hard he won't even quote tweet me...
Notice he still didn't respond to my full argument...
Full argument is here btw, don't be a pussy, explain what I said here that is wrong, or retract your claim that I believe fulfills the textbook definition of rash judgement.
I'm well aware of what the catechism states, but you are making a claim about the interior knowledge and disposition of 500k+ people, which you blatantly do not have. I don't even need to get into an SSPX defense here as you're just wrong on your own premises.
CCC 846 is contingent on two things: knowing the Church is necessary, and refusing her anyway. The knowledge is definitionally an interior act, which, as you surely know, while we can judge that an act is gravely wrong, we must entrust judgment of specific persons to God (per CCC 1861).
Even when the matter is grave, a sin is only mortal with full knowledge and deliberate consent, which are both also interior dispositions...
Ignorance, habituation, coercion and the pressure of circumstances can reduce an individuals culpability (according to CCC 1735). You have literally no access to what any of those people know or their interior dispositions or intentions, and neither does literally anyone else.
Therefore; your claim "we can be sure they're in hell" is not a remotely Orthodox application of CCC 846. It is fundamentally a claim to know hearts, which the Church says we cannot do. I'd also highly recommend since you love pulling out quotes from the catechism, to look up catechism 2477 :). Might be instructive!
Go ahead and reblock me now thanks bye!
This is not to say that you guys shouldn't also be improving your rizz tho lol
While is true that there a small portion of cath guys that are rizzless chuds, that doesn't deflect from the great many "catholic" girls that are unrepentant fornicators/feminists.
Both of those issues are far worse than our lovable awkward incel with no game. But notice you will see far more posts going after the incel, than the thot...