Pinned Tweet
New global rule: Before offering any opinion whatsoever about AI you have to offer a considered opinion on Rival Schools: United by Fate.
Rule in effect now.
Wondering what the legality of the: pay to be able to reject data scraping or don't pay and have to accept data scraping on web pages is.
Love that peer review automated platforms are making peer reviewing more dogshit. Always thought the process was too easy without being emailed weekly about a paper I can't opt out of reviewing.
Also in enshittification today, X now opens links in X but often covers the area to skip through the cookies rending it inoperable.
This is a new level of search engine enshittifcation to me. Not even trying to return what I looked for. No option for 'no what I actually looked for'.
(I was actually, actually after Arthur WIlley)
Is someone writing a thesis on where all these bullshit posts about corporate shortcuts came from and who benefits from them? It's a good third to half of my death spiral Twitter feed and you'd have to be very naive to believe a word of it.
Scientific literature availability remains a problem but thankfully publishers have prioritised developing a little AI agent that appears on every page.
Didn't @nhmlondon have a dodo foot at one point? Not heard about it for a while.
Mark Carnall retweeted
We need to do the Civilian Conservation Corps again.
Yes, we will pay for your service for the next decade on the terms that it handles 99.10% of tasks and irretrievably erase 0.90% of them from existence.
If you're into science fiction &/or biology, zoology, conservation biology, ethics and conservation etc. then I heartily recommend Venomous Lumpsucker by @NedBeauman and let me know when you've read it because I want to nerd out about it (especially Yayflies)
















