MBeda retweeted
🐤 Available on Fidelity.
The Canary hedera-hashgraph:native ETF (Ticker: $HBR) gives investors another convenient way to access HBAR through a brokerage they already know.
Search $HBR in your account.
Or visit CanaryETFs.com/HBR
and canaryetfs.com/hbr/prospectu…
The Canary HBAR ETF (Ticker: HBR) is an exchange-traded product that is not registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the "1940 Act") and therefore is not subject to the same regulations and protections as ETFs and mutual funds registered under the 1940 Act. Investing involves risk, including the possible loss of principal. An investment in HBR is subject to a high degree of risk and heightened volatility and is not suitable for investors who cannot afford the loss of their entire investment. An investment in HBR is not a direct investment in HBAR.
MBeda retweeted
WSX LATEST: @rendernetwork recorded $532,927 in payments for GPU computing jobs during the 30 days ending October 22, surpassing the combined figures of Akash at $209,714 and @Filecoin at $83,920.
The data highlights Render Network’s growing activity in the decentralized computing sector. Over the past 12 months, Render generated $2.21 million in payments, outpacing both competitors over the same period.
These figures underscore the rising demand for decentralized GPU resources as blockchain-based computing networks continue to expand.
MBeda retweeted
🚨 hedera-hashgraph:native PRICE DOWN. ACCUMULATION UP 69%.
While HBAR's price has been falling, a U.S. Hedera fund has quietly grown its holdings from 473 MILLION to nearly 800 MILLION HBAR in 2026.
That's an additional 327 MILLION HBAR.
All accessible through traditional brokerage accounts. No crypto wallet required.
And it still represents less than 2% of the total HBAR supply.
Is the market overlooking something big? 👀
#Hedera #HBAR
MBeda retweeted
I'm noticing quite a bit of negativity and FUD surrounding $HBAR lately, and some of these claims are getting interesting.
Here's another one claiming Karate Combat has abandoned Hedera.
Now, I've looked into this and so far I haven't found any official announcement confirming they've abandoned Hedera or terminated their partnership.
In fact, Karate Combat's own website still references Hedera, as does Hedera's official website.
And here's something interesting from Karate Combat's own dashboard. It reports approximately 448,940 Hedera wallet addresses holding $KARATE compared to just 5,362 on Ethereum. That's a significant difference and shows where the overwhelming majority of its recorded token-holder footprint sits.
Now, I'm well aware that wallet holdings don't necessarily reflect current network activity or prove an ongoing partnership.
I'm an investor, I keep an open mind, and I'm always happy to consider different conclusions backed by verified evidence.
So if anyone has an official announcement or credible source confirming Karate Combat has abandoned Hedera, please share it. I'm genuinely interested.
And seriously, let's keep some perspective here. Karate Combat is one fan-engagement application within a much broader ecosystem. It's hardly Hedera's primary use case. We're talking about a network targeting enterprise infrastructure, tokenisation, payments and financial services.
Even if Karate Combat eventually moves away, there could be several commercial, contractual or technical reasons behind that decision. Until we have confirmation, we're speculating.
And to those trying to connect every drop in HBAR's price to this supposed news, seriously, can we apply a little market intelligence here?
$BTC has been retracing (healthy), along with plenty of other alts. Crypto is a highly correlated, liquidity-driven market. You can't just isolate one token, ignore the broader market conditions and declare that one piece of news caused its price decline. That's not how markets work.
Could project specific news affect price? Of course. But correlation isn't proof of causation.
I've noticed quite a few accounts pushing negative $HBAR narratives lately. Whether it's coordinated or simply people jumping on the same bandwagon, I don't know. But it's becoming pretty obvious how quickly speculation gets repeated as fact.
I'm all for genuine criticism, including questions about adoption, network revenue and token economics. Those are fair discussions.
But if you don't believe in Hedera, don't invest. There are thousands of other assets out there. Why spend so much time obsessing over one you supposedly have no interest in?
Some people are carrying on as though Hedera's entire future depends on a martial arts fan token.
Guys, relax.
Bring the verified facts, not your imagination.
And to those who prefer the constant negativity, carry on. Cope harder.
Karate Combat appears to be abandoning Hedera, and the token is crashing.
This is why I'm careful with specialized tokens. If the project goes away, the coin value drops. $HBAR
MBeda retweeted
Jupiter Lend has $981.24M in active loans on Solana, more than Aave, the largest DeFi lender, has lent on any network except Ethereum.
Aave's next-largest is Plasma at $756.40M. Compound V3 has $648.53M across all its networks.
@JupiterExchange
MBeda retweeted
Render Network users paid $532,927 for GPU jobs in the 30 days to October 22, more than Akash's $209,714 in leases and Filecoin's $83,920 in fees combined.
Over the past year, Render's $2,211,310 tops both.
@rendernetwork
MBeda retweeted
TWO BIG US FIRMS TESTED TOKENIZED COLLATERAL SWAPS ON HEDERA
Fidelity, which manages $7.8T, and U.S. Bank pledged tokenized money market fund collateral (assets put up as security for a trade) to each other in a 48-firm ISDA and GDF test.
Ownera, which powered it, expects first live trades in 2026.
$HBAR
@Tangem I finally got sick of waiting for any response from the team and loaded my seed phrase into Slush Wallet and sent my Sui out. This is a lesson to learn. Seed phrases are a good backup. Please help the rest of the Sui community Tangem.
@tangem Sui disabled JSON-RPC on their public Foundation nodes in late July and targeted full decommission (code removal) for mid-October. Why is Tangem still failing to show accurate SUI balances and process transfers today? Did you update your integration to gRPC/GraphQL, or are you still dependent on deprecated endpoints?
@Tangem 23 hours later after contacting Tangem the issue has been fixed. Anyone experiencing issues with their Sui balance update your Tangem app to version 6.5. Glad support took care of it. 👍
@Tangem We (multiple customers) are having issues with the SUI network not being updated properly in the wallet. I’m using Tangem 6.4.1 . I’ve tried multiple devices. Cellular, WiFi, no VPN. Installing and reinstalling the app. Hiding the token and adding it. Refreshing multiple times. I get the same error across every wallet- “The displayed balance might be outdated due to caching.” I can’t transfer out. I can’t swap. I’ve contacted support. Ticket#264688. I’ve dealt with multiple bots trying to troubleshoot. Please fix this issue guys.
MBeda retweeted
WE ARE LIVE
Prediction Market Space 🎙
Join us and @JUPCommunity for our weekly predict yapp session but this time with a League of Legends Expert as special guest + LoL Bracket Challenge + Clan Rewards and more.
🗓 23rd October
⏰ 2:00pm UTC
📍 Live on X
See you TODAY 👇
xitter.cf/i/spaces/1DxleVyNOmOKL
MBeda retweeted
🔥 UPDATE: Solana says it records $5 trillion in stablecoin volume this year, with more than two months left in the year.
Where do you expect the total to end 2026?
MBeda retweeted
$JUP's Yolo tops $10B in volume.
That took less than seven days.
Yolo offers 1,000x leverage.
The pitch names SOL, BTC and ETH.
With 1,000x on offer, I read volume as
turnover, not committed capital.
Does 1,000x leverage make this volume
a demand signal or a risk signal?
MBeda retweeted
$UNI's v3 and v4 pools now hold $9.4M
of tokenized Tesla and SpaceX stock.
Across DeFi, $29.2M in tokenized stock
includes $9.4M on Uniswap alone.
They can back trades or enter lending.
The stronger case is market utility,
because users can put them to work.
Will traders or lenders move first?
MBeda retweeted
100% of all the $CVX that will ever exist has now been minted.
There will never be any new $CVX created and if you’re not holding any right now the only way to get it is to buy it off someone else on the open market...
And I speak for myself here but I think many other holders probably feel the same way- I’m not letting mine go for cheap 😤
(1/5) $CVX is now fully minted! 🎉
On Oct 15, the @ConvexFinance token hit its hard-coded 100M max supply (block 26,200,161).
WHAT HAPPENED
- No new CVX can ever be minted
- The final 120.8 CVX went out in a batch of reward claims
👇
MBeda retweeted
The last "significant" move on $CVX took us from $1.40 to $8+ in literally 30 days.
That move formed the current range that we have been basing out in for nearly 2 years now.
It is now time to break this range to the upside.
RSI across all timeframes is in a better position now than it was then, which means momentum this time around is likely to be even stronger now than it was then.
It's not only possible, but probable, that $CVX could be trading at $8+ within a month, especially considering how bullish $CRV looks at the moment and recognizing that we have made a separate argument that justifies outperformance from $CVX over $CRV on this next leg to the upisde.
The only major factor that could derail this timeline imo is if $BTC suffers a larger, aggressive pullback that drags the whole market down a bit with it- but even $BTC currently sits at a key support zone which reduces the likelihood of that scenario imo.
