haliday (@michaelhaliday) header
haliday (@michaelhaliday) profile picture

Trying to make sense of things. No DMs please.

Calgary, Alberta
Joined January 2012
Photo by haliday (@michaelhaliday)Photo by haliday (@michaelhaliday)Photo by haliday (@michaelhaliday)Photo by haliday (@michaelhaliday)Photo by haliday (@michaelhaliday)Photo by haliday (@michaelhaliday)Photo by haliday (@michaelhaliday)Photo by haliday (@michaelhaliday)Photo by haliday (@michaelhaliday)Photo by haliday (@michaelhaliday)
Replying to @AlexEpstein
Our victorious enemies will tell the cautionary tale of how our sclerotic empire was undone by stupidity, hubris and a bizarre religious obsession that caused us to sacrifice ourselves to avoid an imaginary apocalypse.
20
15
4
203
haliday retweeted
Wow. Instead of investing in treatment and recovery, the Liberals used your tax dollars to hand out free drugs, including fentanyl, to those suffering with addiction. The result? Since 2015, more than 50,000 Canadians have died from drug overdoses. Enabling and perpetuating drug use is not the answer. Instead, we must support compassionate treatment, recovery and rehabilitation.
113
721
44
1,972
23,778
They are manufacturing this support through propaganda like this. Canada is in such a dark place right now. We are basically an experiment Country in the eyes of the globalist. A compliant and controlled media machine, a population who can be manipulated to accept anything and politicians being controlled by outside unelected organizations. Carney keeps repeating “sovereignty” because he wants you to believe we still are. There is nothing sovereign about Canada.
Nearly three-quarters of Canadians support PM in seeking closer ties with Europe nationalpost.com/news/canada…
112
345
24
1,382
13,587
I was actually really surprised to discover that the number of foreign workers in Canada is *higher than it's ever been.* All Carney has done is slow the intake (and even that's still pretty high).
FIRST READING: Carney’s 'under control' immigration still blowing out the numbers nationalpost.com/opinion/fir…
43
275
6
1,270
80,655
haliday retweeted
Among 32 high-income countries with universal health care, Canada is second in spending, but 26th in beds, 28th in MRI units, and CT scanners, and 30th in doctors.
84
267
34
1,493
36,652
I’m calling Mark Carney’s bluff. A Canadian energy company will pay to upgrade the Port of Prince Rupert so it can ship 250,000 barrels per day of Alberta energy by rail to the Pacific Ocean. There are supportive Conservative governments in Saskatchewan, Alberta, and now in B.C. The public supports diversifying our economy away from the United States. Our environmental protections remain world-class. This is as close to unanimous as we’re ever going to see in a democracy of 40 million people. All you have to do is extend the same exemption to the tanker ban that you’ve given to the Port of Vancouver. This doesn’t need a new committee, a new major projects office, or a nickel of Canadian taxpayer money, and It’ll create jobs across the country to build new rail cars. So what’s it going to be, Mark?
239
1,063
45
3,141
47,839
I thought the climate emergency panic was off people's agenda. Answer for 2050 is simple. Countries that are shit now will be shit then. Countries that are well off now will be well then unless they attract people from shit countries and pay them for doing nothing. And all will have little to do with climate change.
Hey @grok, by 2050, which 5 countries will become the best places to live because of climate change, and which 5 will become the worst? Explain why
9
19
1
171
13,742
X is the number ONE news app in 143 Countries, and CANADA is not one of them 🤯 I asked Grok the top 5 new sources in Canada including independent voices and 4 of the 5 are Government funded 👀 I believe this is a big part of the problem. We need more independent voices in Canada. Congrats to Rebel news here
119
332
26
880
13,722
OKAY, answer this 🇨🇦 Canada is the most educated country in the G7, with the 2nd highest unemployment rate, AND claiming to not have the skilled people therefore dropping the LMIA requirement of looking in Canada before hiring foreign I DARE any journalist to ask CARNEY this
87
360
12
1,524
22,599
What scares me the most is that probably 99% of Canadians don’t have a grasp of the basic accounting concepts necessary to understand this. They know the word deficit is bad, but they don’t have a frame of reference to understand if $141 billion is a big number in the grand scheme of things. They’ve been largely desensitized to the word “billion” as there are now multi-billion-dollar announcements every week from the government that are all framed as investments. Canadian media has knowingly and unknowingly propagandized the population so much that people aren’t able to assess the situation we’re in accurately.
Ottawa has lent $141 BILLION to Crown corporations. 💸 On the books, those loans count as assets. They don't touch the deficit. This week the Budget Officer told MPs there's "very much that risk" some never get paid back. If they don't, the write-offs land on the deficit. 📉 Canada Post is the test case. Billions in "repayable" funding. Biggest loss in its history last year. Repayable with what? And Carney wants more Crown corps?? Is this why Mark Carney is eager to create so many new Crown corporations? To borrow more money, count the loans as assets, and make the deficit look smaller while taxpayers carry all the risk? Borrow it. Book it as an asset. Promise a balanced operating budget. 🤦🏻‍♂️ Basic math, eh? 🇨🇦
23
135
4
444
13,349
I have zero trust left. Zero. A sitting Prime Minister with an ethics screen covering 100+ companies tied to his former firm, Chinese capital and fentanyl cash moving through Canadian banks, a state-owned Chinese shipyard building ferries near our coasts with federal backing, and CSIS warnings that Beijing is targeting First Nations leaders for resources—and the official line is still “elbows up against America.” This is not a sideshow. It is the system working exactly as designed: loose rules, incomplete disclosure, and selective enforcement. Blind trusts and ethics screens that leave most of a trillion-dollar portfolio untouched do not protect the public. Banks that launder drug money until a foreign government forces the issue do not protect Canadians. Deals that send shipbuilding and strategic capacity overseas while we lecture the US do not protect our future. For my nine grandchildren this is not abstract. When the people in charge have unresolved conflicts, when money and influence flow with little friction, and when the narrative is managed instead of the risks, the result is a country that cannot defend its own interests or its own kids. Tighten the ethics rules. Force full divestiture. Enforce real anti-money-laundering standards at home. Demand transparency on every major China-linked deal. Or stop pretending the official story is the real one. The evidence is already on the record. The only question is whether anyone will act on it.
They keep telling you Canada is at "war" with America. Investigative journalist Sam Cooper (author of Willful Blindness, founder of The Bureau) says that's exactly backwards — and he has the documents to prove it. In this episode, Sam breaks down Mark Carney's 100+ undisclosed conflicts of interest, the TD Bank fentanyl money-laundering scandal, China's bond purchases quietly flowing through Canadian banks, the BC Ferries deal with a Chinese shipbuilder near sensitive coastal waters, and why CSIS says Beijing is actively targeting Canadian First Nations leaders. If you've been told "elbows up" against America, this conversation will change how you see the real hybrid war being fought on Canadian soil. @scoopercooper
23
237
2
478
4,391
I'm Japanese. Americans who visit my country tend to come home with the same question: how did Japan stay Japan? They watched trains leave on the exact second. They left a phone on a café table, came back an hour later, and found it still sitting there next to the cold coffee. Some of them read that in 2023 people in Tokyo turned in more than 4 billion yen in lost cash to the police, and assumed it was a typo. It wasn't. There are two halves to the answer. Most people who praise Japan online only know the first one. For America, the second one matters more. THE FIRST HALF: HOW WE KEPT OURSELVES It starts in July 1853, when Commodore Perry brought four black ships to the mouth of Edo Bay and pointed his guns at a country that had been closed for over two hundred years. Across the sea, China had just lost the Opium War and was being forced open by foreign powers. Japan's leaders could see exactly what happened to old civilizations that refused to change. So they changed faster than any nation ever had. But they did it under a rule: wakon yōsai. Japanese spirit, Western technique. Take the railways, the steel, the constitution, the navy. Leave the self-contempt at the dock. That rule survived everything that came after. War, defeat, two atomic bombs, nearly seven years of American occupation. We copied your factories and then beat you at cars. I was going to write that no Japanese classroom ever taught us our civilization was a crime. That's not quite true. After 1945 a lot of teachers taught a very guilty version of the war, and Japanese conservatives have been fighting over those textbooks for decades. But the guilt stayed inside the history lesson. It never became a theory of everything, the way it did in your universities. Nobody told us our language was oppressive, or that the family was a structure of domination, or that being good at math was a form of privilege. Foreign residents are still about 3 percent of the population. When outsiders called us closed, most people shrugged and went back to work. For a long time I thought that shrug was a weakness, a kind of stubborn provincialism. I've changed my mind. I think it's most of what a border actually is: a people quietly sure it has something worth keeping. So American conservatives are right about Japan. Confidence in your own culture works. We are the proof. THE SECOND HALF: HOW WE ARE DISAPPEARING In 1949, about 2.7 million babies were born in Japan. In 2024 it was 686,061. The first time I saw that number I assumed I was reading the wrong column. I wasn't. Our fertility rate is 1.15. The population peaked around 2008 and has shrunk every year since. There are mountain villages now where the only new things are the vending machines. And this didn't happen under the left. One conservative party, the LDP, has governed Japan for almost all of the last seventy years. No woke revolution, no open borders, no defund the police. The right won the culture war here before it started. The country is shrinking anyway. What went wrong is economic, and it's very old. On the last trading day of 1989 the Nikkei closed at 38,915. Then the bubble burst. The banks were sitting on mountains of bad loans, and instead of letting failed companies fail, they kept lending them fresh money so nobody had to admit the losses. Economists later called them zombie firms; Caballero, Hoshi and Kashyap documented the whole thing in 2008. The Nikkei didn't get back to its 1989 high until February 2024. Thirty-four years. The zombies were kept alive at someone's expense, and it was the young. To hold the old structure up, the system protected the people already inside: lifetime jobs for the men hired before the crash, pay by seniority, pensions no politician dared touch because old people vote. Whoever arrived after 1990 got what was left. Today close to four in ten workers are non-regular, on short contracts or part-time or sent in by agencies, and men in those jobs marry far less often than men with permanent ones. Nobody plans a family on a contract that ends in March. Real wages are still lower than in 1996. Government debt is well over 200 percent of GDP, the highest in the developed world. When the government finally admitted the birth crisis, it did what governments do and announced a program: about 3.6 trillion yen a year for children. Births kept falling. Have you ever seen a bonsai up close? You take a tree that wants to grow thirty meters tall, and every year you cut back its roots and wire its branches so it keeps exactly the same shape. Some live for centuries. They're beautiful. They never get any bigger. That's what conservatism becomes when it only preserves and never builds. We protected everything, including the things that should have been allowed to die. In 2022 Elon wrote that unless something changes, Japan will eventually cease to exist. A lot of people here called it rude. I was annoyed too, for about a day. Then I looked at the census again. WHAT AMERICA SHOULD TAKE FROM THIS Japan shows you can keep your culture without apologizing for it. Don't let anyone tell you that pride in your country is the problem. Japan also shows that a nation can get culture right and still lose, if it protects its old companies, its old voters and its old arrangements against its own young people. It dies politely, with clean streets and trains on time. You still have what we lost: a system that lets things fail and lets new things be born. Bankruptcy, startups, people who move across the country for a better job. Elon is a product of that system. Every bailout, every subsidy for a company that should have died, every rule that protects the insider against the newcomer moves you a little closer to us. If you know someone who says "America should just be more like Japan," send them this. Both halves. A nation isn't saved by preserving its past. It's saved by having someone to hand it to.
68
423
35
2,182
195,304
Canada is 2nd highest for health care spending in OECD What did we get for it? 30th out of 32 countries for availability of doctors 26th out of 31 for hospital beds dedicated to physical care 28th out of 31 for availability of MRI & CT scanners nationalpost.com/news/canada…
5
41
5
99
3,334
How can this policy even exist? The Auditor General already answered. More than 153,000 international students were flagged for not complying with their study permits. IRCC only had the money and capacity to look at about 4,000 of them. Of the 800 cases where they found outright fraud or fake documents, most people simply applied for the next status—work permits, permanent residence, asylum—and a large share got approved. No systematic enforcement. That is not an accident. It is a system built for volume first and verification later, if at all. Canadians pay for the hotels, the modular units, the infrastructure, and the services while the same pathways keep moving people forward. Youth unemployment stays elevated, growth forecasts keep getting cut, and the permanent-residence door just got easier for high-wage offers by dropping the LMIA labour-market test. The temporary numbers get cleaned up on paper. The fraud and the housing pressure stay. Mark Carney and the Liberals inherited Trudeau’s surge and chose management over reversal. I have nine grandchildren who will inherit the housing costs, the trust deficit, and the weaker labour market this creates. When the Auditor General documents that fraud cases are flagged by the tens of thousands and then mostly ignored so people can stay, the priority is clear. Tighten the system: real capacity for compliance checks, automatic flags that stop progression, labour-market tests that cannot be waived, and numbers that do not outrun housing and jobs. Or admit the model is open intake with under-enforcement and stop pretending Canadians come first. Zero trust left.
🚨Stockton Report🚨 Canada is drowning in a fraud crisis—and almost all of it traces straight back to immigration. Worse—Canadians are bankrolling the housing supply in their own communities to make it happen.
8
203
3
384
3,120
‼️ INSANE. The UN just handed Canada a gold star. Canada is carrying NEARLY HALF of the UN's REFUGEE referrals. UN Refugee Agency told member states Canada showed "remarkable leadership," accounting for "nearly half of UNHCR resettlement referrals in 2026." The world is pulling back. So the UN leans on the one government that keeps saying YES. WE’RE FIRST PLACE IN A RACE NOBODY ELSE IS RUNNING.
298
1,639
86
5,645
110,764
Bootstraps mentality is not so much true as it is useful. Most of your outcomes are shaped by genetics and random luck that no policy can affect. But there is some degree to which you’re affected by the ideas inside your head. If you are possessed by the “try as hard as you can” ghost you’ll do marginally better than the person possessed by the “it’s all outside my control” ghost. The balance of factors which determine success matters when discussing policy. But individually you should focus entirely on your bootstraps because that’s the only thing you actually control. The rest is just giving yourself an excuse to fail. Yes, someone with a genetic 100 IQ will never be a physicist or a billionaire. But they might make manager and buy a house and get married if they believe hard work matters. Choose the ghosts you let into your head wisely, based on results.
Obesity is like unemployment Yes in theory, individuals should have both under control, but both are absolutely shaped by broader societal factors so “bootstrapping” only goes so far
44
47
9
561
26,553
Imagine, for a moment, that all major newspaper and broadcast outlets refrained from euphemisms and selective framing in their coverage of urban disorder. Imagine if they refused to gatekeep certain causal patterns outside the Overton window of respectable discussion. Just imagine what the political consequences would be if they'd stop the mass gaslighting for once. What's standing between you and paradise is the traitorous media class. That a growing minority of people have been able to see past it is largely thanks to @X and the rise of independent and startup media
The mainstream media are fuming. Marine Le Pen, head of France’s most popular party, National Rally, is exploiting the French riots for her political advantage, the media grouse. Le Pen and her right-hand man, Jordan Bardella, portray the riots as the confirmation of everything they have been warning about for years, especially regarding Third World immigration. This is a ruse, complains the press and its establishment sources, a mere rhetorical trick. A front-page article in today’s New York Times quotes a political scientist at Paris’s Sciences Po: “The picture of France emerging this morning, in light of all the destruction, plays well into their hands.” The Wall Street Journal sounds the same note today: “The social instability over the weekend absolutely plays into Le Pen’s campaign that the establishment has delivered chaos,” said Mujtaba Rahman, from the risk analysis firm Eurasia Group. Even the papers’ headlines echo each other: “France’s Far Right Seizes the Moment as Rioting Stuns the Country” (New York Times); “Marine Le Pen Seizes on French Chaos to Present Herself as Leader in Waiting” (Wall Street Journal). It is necessary to deconstruct these far-right narratives; thankfully, the press is there to help us. The violence “perfectly aligned with the image the National Rally has long painted of a France divided into two and battling for survival,” a political science professor at the University of Nice, Côte d’Azur told the New York Times. The Wall Street Journal writes that the “far-right” Le Pen has “cast” France as a nation adrift, “buffeted by waves of immigration and lawlessness that have torn at the country’s social fabric.” It is mere coincidence that that image of a divided, degraded France constructed by the National Rally and the violence on the streets seem to align. That alignment does not mean that the National Rally was right, just that its demagogy was opportune. But the waves of hate-filled destruction crashing over France’s once great cities validate Le Pen and Bardella’s diagnosis of France’s demographic catastrophe, not as narrative but as empirical fact. The Wall Street Journal again tries to dismiss Le Pen’s prognostications as a rhetorical maneuver: “Le Pen’s anti-immigration stance...gives her another way to frame the unrest. Le Pen has cast the unrest as the work of far-left radicals allied with youths from France’s banlieues, the poor urban outskirts where much of the country’s minority Muslim population resides.” How else would the Journal “cast” the “unrest?” As the work of lavender harvesters from Provence? The elite effort at euphemism is by now desperate: “The looting drew attention to a segment of the population—specifically young people from certain neighborhoods, some of whom are from immigrant backgrounds,” pollster Adélaïde Zulfikarpasic told the Journal. “And that hits the themes at the heart of National Rally’s rhetoric.” A conversation on German public media station ZDF yesterday between the ever-pinched and purse-lipped anchor Marietta Slomka and a French academic in Bonn referred delicately to the “decades-long problem” of poverty, concentration, and “integration” in the Plattenbauten (the concrete slab housing projects) around Paris. The problem is not “integration,” which suggests a failing in the host country, however, it is large-scale Third World immigration, which has turned many of these projects into no-go zones. And now that local anarchy is spreading. If naming a deliberate attack on Western civilization by those who feel only resentment and envy earns one the title of far-right extremist or racist, so be it. The mayhem in France is not rhetoric, it is reality. And the National Rally’s law enforcement and deportation proposals are precisely what France and the rest of Europe need today.
19
115
4
989
24,291
The mainstream media are fuming. Marine Le Pen, head of France’s most popular party, National Rally, is exploiting the French riots for her political advantage, the media grouse. Le Pen and her right-hand man, Jordan Bardella, portray the riots as the confirmation of everything they have been warning about for years, especially regarding Third World immigration. This is a ruse, complains the press and its establishment sources, a mere rhetorical trick. A front-page article in today’s New York Times quotes a political scientist at Paris’s Sciences Po: “The picture of France emerging this morning, in light of all the destruction, plays well into their hands.” The Wall Street Journal sounds the same note today: “The social instability over the weekend absolutely plays into Le Pen’s campaign that the establishment has delivered chaos,” said Mujtaba Rahman, from the risk analysis firm Eurasia Group. Even the papers’ headlines echo each other: “France’s Far Right Seizes the Moment as Rioting Stuns the Country” (New York Times); “Marine Le Pen Seizes on French Chaos to Present Herself as Leader in Waiting” (Wall Street Journal). It is necessary to deconstruct these far-right narratives; thankfully, the press is there to help us. The violence “perfectly aligned with the image the National Rally has long painted of a France divided into two and battling for survival,” a political science professor at the University of Nice, Côte d’Azur told the New York Times. The Wall Street Journal writes that the “far-right” Le Pen has “cast” France as a nation adrift, “buffeted by waves of immigration and lawlessness that have torn at the country’s social fabric.” It is mere coincidence that that image of a divided, degraded France constructed by the National Rally and the violence on the streets seem to align. That alignment does not mean that the National Rally was right, just that its demagogy was opportune. But the waves of hate-filled destruction crashing over France’s once great cities validate Le Pen and Bardella’s diagnosis of France’s demographic catastrophe, not as narrative but as empirical fact. The Wall Street Journal again tries to dismiss Le Pen’s prognostications as a rhetorical maneuver: “Le Pen’s anti-immigration stance...gives her another way to frame the unrest. Le Pen has cast the unrest as the work of far-left radicals allied with youths from France’s banlieues, the poor urban outskirts where much of the country’s minority Muslim population resides.” How else would the Journal “cast” the “unrest?” As the work of lavender harvesters from Provence? The elite effort at euphemism is by now desperate: “The looting drew attention to a segment of the population—specifically young people from certain neighborhoods, some of whom are from immigrant backgrounds,” pollster Adélaïde Zulfikarpasic told the Journal. “And that hits the themes at the heart of National Rally’s rhetoric.” A conversation on German public media station ZDF yesterday between the ever-pinched and purse-lipped anchor Marietta Slomka and a French academic in Bonn referred delicately to the “decades-long problem” of poverty, concentration, and “integration” in the Plattenbauten (the concrete slab housing projects) around Paris. The problem is not “integration,” which suggests a failing in the host country, however, it is large-scale Third World immigration, which has turned many of these projects into no-go zones. And now that local anarchy is spreading. If naming a deliberate attack on Western civilization by those who feel only resentment and envy earns one the title of far-right extremist or racist, so be it. The mayhem in France is not rhetoric, it is reality. And the National Rally’s law enforcement and deportation proposals are precisely what France and the rest of Europe need today.
144
310
38
2,135
165,394
I have to provide context as Mark Carney looking to restart mass immigration and spinning the stats he is quoting to the media who isn't questioning him. Here is what is actually happening. > Liberals are now looking to mass immigrate foreigners under permanent residency and it won't require proof that companies can't find Canadians. > We are moving away from temporary visas and converting as many as possible to permanent residents while still taking on TFW. This pads the numbers of temporary workers in Canada. Here is the important data: > the work permits Canada is issuing are surging. > so far to August this year, Canada issued/renewed 732k work permits. That's already 96% of all issued in 2025. > 2026's work permit issuing will be close to 2023's which was a record year. Canada doesn't have immigration under control as Mark Carney trying to claim. We are issuing hundreds of thousands of work permits that keep wages down while Canada and Canadian are losing jobs.
74
585
44
1,419
29,887
Our #Auspol should not have a political class - we should have ordinary citizens who for a period are in House & Senate and who then go back to "normal" jobs outside politics. We should have a media that contests rather than facilitates rampant lying & impoverishing policies.
24
35
1
227
3,396
"You reduce crime by eliminating poverty." This is one of the greatest intellectual confusions of our century. It sounds compassionate. It feels obvious. And the moment you actually test it, it falls apart. Let's look at the data. First, the correlation is real. Nobody serious denies that poorer areas have more crime. In Sweden, kids from the poorest 20% of families are about 7 times more likely to be convicted of a violent crime than kids from the richest 20%. But correlation is not causation. So Swedish researchers did something brilliant: they compared siblings. Same parents, same home, same upbringing, but different family income at different points in their childhood, because parents' income moves over time. Result, on more than 500,000 children (Sariaslan et al., British Journal of Psychiatry, 2014): once you account for what's shared inside the family, the effect of income on violent crime goes from 7x to nothing. The hazard ratio drops to 0.95. No effect. Finland ran the same test on 650,000 people. Same result: the income-crime link disappears when you compare siblings. What predicts crime isn't the bank balance. It's what travels inside families. Second test: what happens when poverty spikes for everyone at once? 2008. US unemployment doubled from 5% to nearly 10%. 15% of Americans officially poor. If poverty creates crime, crime should have exploded. Instead it fell. Year after year. Robbery, the most "economic" crime of all, dropped 10% in 2010 alone. Criminologists literally said they were stumped. Same story in the Great Depression: 25% unemployment, and crime went down in many cities. Third test: take families out of poverty and see. The US government ran a randomized lottery called Moving to Opportunity. Thousands of families in public housing got vouchers to move to low-poverty neighborhoods. For boys, violent arrests dropped at first, property crime arrests went up, and over time the effects faded. New zip code. Same behavior. Fourth: the claim that police don't matter. This one is just false. Chalfin et al. (American Economic Review: Insights, 2022): each additional police officer prevents about 0.1 homicides. And per capita, the lives saved are twice as many among Black victims as among white victims. The people who suffer most from "police don't matter" are the poorest neighborhoods. So what does predict crime? The Dunedin study followed 1,000 children from birth to age 32. Self-control measured between ages 3 and 11 predicted adult criminal convictions, even after controlling for social class and IQ (Moffitt et al., PNAS, 2011). Cognitive ability matters too: across 700,000 Swedish men, lower cognitive scores at 18 track with violent convictions, and the link barely moves when you control for childhood socioeconomic status (Frisell et al., 2012). And here's the part nobody quotes: in Dunedin, kids whose self-control improved over time did better than predicted. Behavior can change. Which means responsibility is real. Why does this matter? Because "poverty creates crime" isn't just wrong. It's toxic. It turns criminals into victims. The man who robbed you becomes a symptom of "the system," and you, the real victim, become a footnote in someone else's narrative. It merges two completely different things. "You're poor, we'll help you" is one policy. "You're poor and you committed a crime, so we'll excuse you" is another. Fusing them insults the millions of poor people who work, raise their kids, and never hurt anyone. The vast majority of poor people are not criminals. That alone kills the theory. It removes responsibility. Build a political system on "your circumstances made you do it" and you destroy the one thing that actually changes behavior: the certainty that you own your choices. Every excuse the state manufactures is an incentive. And it feeds the state forever. If every crime is a social failure, every crime justifies a new program, a new budget, a new agency. Crime becomes the business model of bureaucracy. The alternative is simple and old. A lighter state that protects instead of explains. The same rules for everyone, from the projects or from a gated community. Certain, swift punishment for anyone who commits a crime. And never, ever telling someone their crime was written in their social condition. Treating someone as responsible is respecting them. Excusing someone because they're poor is the most condescending thing you can do to them.
This quoted post is unavailable.
215
1,801
190
8,864
264,216