Mohan KG

Always remember. What is going on in Paris and Milan is what they wanted to do in Delhi. Arson and looting. The usual suspects in the press would have whitewashed it because 'it's happening in Europe too'. We don't give MHA and Delhi Police enough credit.

The BBC used the line: "Mostly peaceful" 🤡 Defund the BBC.

BJP Dimwits, Get a life and stop lying through your teeth. Do you honestly believe people will buy your nonsense anymore? It is 2026. People have seen through your brazen lies. They know who you are. I understand your desperation. But please, just shut up and sit down.

14 procedural lapses .. and the petition couldn’t be accepted at the Supreme Court of the OPP parties .. what kind of shoddy preparation was this !

Unlucky Hamam. He would be wishing to be caught in India. Fair trial, media defence, whole range of system to give biryani, if possible send him home, write essay, no one died so why punish, and Jantar Mantar protest to put Capt Smit on trial. He would have lived long life.

Lagta hai sahib ne Urdu mein Tiranga pehna hai. Ya phir Bharat 🇮🇳 ki jagah Ireland 🇮🇪 ka Independence Day mana rahay hain.

यह कौन स्टाइल का तिरंगा लगाए हैं? उल्टा ये भारत 🇮🇳 का कम आयरलैंड 🇮🇪 का ज़्यादा लगता है

Saturday night humour: Recent Announcement: Marriage Certificate is Not A Proof That You Are Married. It’s Just a Document To Show That You Had Attended Your Marriage Ceremony. 😁😁

A video of @DrMohanBhagwat ji is being widely circulated as a response to my letter is false. I dispatched my letter and put it up on social media on June 15, while this interaction by the RSS Chief was on June 13/14. Let me set the record straight. The RSS has every right to be a cultural organization. That is their choice. But it cannot simultaneously exercise enormous social and political influence while repeatedly insisting that it has no political agenda and therefore owes no public accountability. The BJP itself acknowledges the RSS as its ideological parent and their sway over public life is undeniable. The RSS receives donations through a vast ecosystem of 2500+ affiliated organisations, both domestic and overseas and operates out of a sprawling headquarters in the national capital and other State capitals. The RSS chief enjoys Advanced Security Liaison protocol and other people of RSS have protocols funded by the taxpayer and the public is entitled to know whether the organisation complies with the same legal standards expected of everyone else. Formal recognition under law would settle this contradiction once and for all. The argument that a religion cannot be registered and therefore the RSS need not be registered is both flawed and absurd. The RSS cannot be considered to be representing any religion when they themselves are only 100 years in existence and no Government has asked any religion to be registered. I have no objection to the RSS carrying out cultural, social, political or any other lawful activity. It can run schools, service organisations, think tanks or even a music academy if it chooses. The only expectation is that it functions transparently and within the framework of the law, like every other organised body in this country. It is pursuant to this principle that a formal response has been requested in writing. Above all, Mr. Bhagwat's immediate assertion that the RSS is under no obligation to answer any questions is the most troubling (while he enjoys every protocol on tax payers money), It reflects a mindset that public accountability is optional and that the organisation stands above legal scrutiny. In a constitutional democracy, no institution, however old or influential, enjoys that privilege. Shun the arrogance, follow the law and have your “office bearers” or “legal heads” come and explain to me. Jai Samvidhan. Jai Hindu.

Why can’t RSS get registered ? It’s a simple question. Where is the politics ?

Mahua Moitra is preemptively threatening people that she will file case against them if they treat her to "Dim Therapy" 😭😭 The terror of eggs is very real 😭😭

“Bharat mein Azadi, can also mean Bharat se Azadi …. India is occupying Kashmir” Who said this? Your darling Umar Khalid, there’s video evidence so you cannot deny and don’t even try to contextualise this

I did not to go to the Supreme Court today to hear its order in the SIR case. As a litigant in this case, and as someone who was given the honour of addressing the court, I should have been hopeful, anxious, or at least curious. I was not. The case was decided long ago. We were only waiting for the transcript and its fine print. The course of this case was settled in August last year. Having heard arguments against SIR for three days, the court moved away from examining the constitutionality of SIR and effectively converted itself into a Consumer Forum, focused on grievance redressal and arbitration, rather than constitutional principles. The case was effectively decided when the apex court allowed the ECI to rush through the Bihar elections without first deciding the matter, and without requiring the ECI to rectify even the most glaring defects in post-SIR rolls. There was little left of this case once the ECI proceeded with the second and then the third phase of SIR, while the Hon’ble Court leisurely heard arguments about its constitutionality. SIR had become a fait accompli. Any remaining doubt disappeared when the Hon’ble judges observed in open court that no one would be allowed to obstruct SIR. The final nail in the coffin of this petition was hammered during the hearing of another petition before the same Bench, when an Hon’ble judge remarked that millions denied their right to vote need not fret, since they could vote in the next election. At that moment, the court abdicated its constitutional responsibility. Shorn of legalese, the simple truth is that the highest court of a constitutional democracy has already authorised the disenfranchisement of millions of citizens — at least 59 million so far, could go up eventually to 100 million. It was inconceivable that the court would now declare SIR unconstitutional and annul all post-SIR elections. The lawyers were waiting for the the exact legal reasoning deployed to arrive at a conclusion that was already known. Such legal gymnastics did not interest me. Some friends were looking for some crumbs in the hope that the court might at least wish to save face, if not save the voters. Eventually that too did not happen. Polite noises apart, the Court has handed over a carteblac to the ECI to do what it pleases with the voters list. ADR vs Union of India (2026) is to our times what ADM Jabalpur vs Shivkant Shukla (1976) was to the previous assault on our democracy. We must hope that the SIR judgment does not mark the crumbling of the last constitutional wall, as ADM Jabalpur once did. We must believe that one day this constitutional abdication by the guardian of the Constitution will be recognised for what it was. And reversed. Jai Hind!

Secretary of State Marco Rubio at Missionaries of Charity’s Mother House in Kolkata, saluting their exemplary globally renowned humanitarian service. SHEER HYPOCRISY of @narendramodi government on display: an anti Christian government which through new proposed FCRA bill had barred Missionaries of Charity from receiving foreign aid and is enabling seizure of Church assets, thus destroying the ability of Christian institutions to do the humanitarian , massive educational and healthcare providing service they are known for, yet now show casing our revered Mother Teresa’s organisation for the international visitor.

I can see only Congress workers and leaders protesting on the ground in different states against the NEET paper leak and demanding the resignation of Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan. My message to the youth and Gen Z is that Congress is the real and only alternative. Do not fall into another trap like we saw with Arvind Kejriwal and his RSS sponsored movement, which damaged the country.

Back in 2012, @sagarikaghose then a news anchor now Deputy Leader of TMC organised a newsroom Q&A with students. A 22 year old Tanya Bharadwaj, asked a question to Mamata Banerjee and Mamata got furious, labelled her CPI cadet, Maoist and more and walked off the stage. That same night, Tanya had to leave Kolkata as goons and party supporters were allegedly after her, according to a batchmate. Sagarika Ghose did not support or defend her. Today, 14 years later that same lady recalls the incident and heaves a sigh of relief.

Please take a look @sardesairajdeep ! My facts are NEVER wrong. Tell zafar to eat his words

What kind of language is this, CJI Suryakant? You are calling the youngsters of the country “parasites” and “cockroaches.” I condemn this language, and the CJI must apologise.