Del problema (@mosuni8) profile picture

expert za Sahel

Joined February 2017
Photo by Del problema (@mosuni8)Photo by Del problema (@mosuni8)Photo by Del problema (@mosuni8)Photo by Del problema (@mosuni8)Photo by Del problema (@mosuni8)Photo by Del problema (@mosuni8)Photo by Del problema (@mosuni8)Photo by Del problema (@mosuni8)Photo by Del problema (@mosuni8)Photo by Del problema (@mosuni8)
Del problema retweeted
Evo, to je prava demokracija, da moraš pobegnit iz države, če izgubiš volitve.
Brazilski senator Flavio Bolsonaro, ki je bil v nedeljo poražen na predsedniških volitvah, naj bi odpotoval v ZDA, potem ko mu je vrhovno sodišče odredilo predajo potnih listov in prepovedalo zapustiti državo. rtvslo.si/svet/s-in-j-amerik…
45
79
5
294
8,146
Arhivov, o katerih ni bilo leta nobenega govora, noče tisti, ki je po letih tišine povedal, da jih hoče. Ker to temo je dal ven, ker arhivov noče. Arhivi gor al dol, men je sam vedno bolj osupljivo, kako enim res lahko cist vsak bulshit prodaš. 😮
Replying to @BautamaG
Točno to opozarjajo moji kolegi v Srbiji. Arhivov se najbolj boji tisti, ki najbolj na glas vpije, da bi jih rad imel. V slogu: “primite tatu!”
4
1
6
184
:)
Kdo bi si mislil. 🤣 Nasprotniki namišljene politične policije nasprotujejo razkritju tajnih arhivov resnične politične policije.
23
Americani bi lahko vodili statistiko za cel svet.
Luka Doncic is now 16–0 when he scores more than 45 points in a game. The next closest is Larry Bird, who went 14–2 when scoring more than 45 points.
36
Dobre, ne samo tale spodaj.
La mejor que ví hecho con IA hasta ahora. 10/10
23
:)
This quoted post is unavailable.
1
54
:) jp tbh, pri nas smo imeli vseeno nekaj vec menjav oblasti kot v srbiji, vprasanje pa kdo bolje prenasa poraz na volitvah, vucic al nasa levica 🤔
V Srbiji se dogaja nekaj podobnega, kot se je pri nas letos aprila. Zdelo se je nemogoče, pa vendar so tudi pri nas zmagale demokratične sile in sestavile @vladaRS.
1
1
193
Večinoma je "problem" v narodu, ne v vodstvu. Narod izbira ljudi, ki jih nagovarjajo tako kot si narod želi, potem s(m)o pa občasno začudeni od kje so ti voditelji prišli. Od kje le, to ste vi..oz. to smo mi. Venezuela po Chavezu izvoli Madura. Ljubljančani po Zokiju Mesca?:)
Tako kot sem sitnaril nad drkalci nad “studenstkimi protesti” od starta: to je zmes clueless bebcev, levičarskih teoretikov, leve in desne sodrge, predvsem so pa Srbi. Vučiću človek privošči, da ga bodo demontirali, ni pa problem on. Vse kar rabimo vedeti o Srbiji:
1
4
181
Noro dobro, da je že svetlo ko še spim in da je zato že tema, ko se vračam iz joba. Dajmo kar za dve uri prestavit uro.
2
72
Tole izpade žal precej podobno njenemu nasvetu, da se je treba med vožnjo pripeti z varnostnim pasom:)
1
1
82
Plot twist, tudi izvolili so oba.
Srbi spodnesli že drugega tirana v 25-ih letih. Kakšna zgostitev zgodovine. Konstantno producirajo več zgodovine, kot so je sposobni predelati.
1
1
33
Tveganje revščine torej narasca sorazmerno z rastjo drzavnega proračuna... 😎
“Se tudi pri nas obetajo protesti?” Dnevnik (Dernovšek) se ne sprašuje, ampak poziva. Poznana taktika komunistov. Imajo pa resen problem. Palestinske zastave v rokah teroristov, ki dobesedno iz nič ropajo in požigajo. Zaenkrat še ne uporabljajo otrok za živi ščit.
14
Del problema retweeted
Replying to @MarjeticaM
Ljudje iz zjebanih držav imajo vedno ful idejo kako vodit državo. Tko nekak kot tisti z razmetanimi sobami:)
1
4
118
Del problema retweeted
Podjetja z managerjem, ki ima plačo 70k in ima poleg njega se 10 zaposlenih ne obstajajo. Tako placani ljudje vodijo podjetja z tisoči zaposlenih in razdelitev njihove plače med delavce bi vsakemu delavcu prinesla par evrov.
1
1
35
Del problema retweeted
X: ha ha, Janšev buddy Vučič je zgubil volitve, Janez je naslednji, avtorizarci padajo. Meanwhile realnost:
54
37
12
222
12,310
Zakaj se vodijo politike, ki jih vecina noče.
Most Western democracies have been hacked. Not with code. With institutional architecture. Let me show you how it works, using the most advanced example: the European Union. First, how it works. Once every five years, you vote for a European Parliament that cannot even initiate legislation. The body that proposes laws is the Commission: 27 commissioners nobody elected, appointed after backroom bargaining between heads of state. Bills are then negotiated between the Commission, Parliament and Council in "trilogues", closed-door meetings where the real decisions get made. A law that will apply to 450 million people goes through corridors that 99.9% of them will never see. Now look at who's in those corridors. Brussels has become the lobbying capital of the world: nearly 18,000 organizations on the transparency register, tens of thousands of lobbyists, more than 50 for every single MEP. And that's just the declared part. Add the revolving door: a former MEP only has to wait six months before becoming a lobbyist to the EU himself. The real problem is distance. A national MP who votes for a law that ruins the farmers in his district runs into them at the market on Saturday. In Brussels, the decision-maker never meets the people who live with his decisions. But he meets lobbyists every day: at lunch, at cocktails, at conferences. So the system doesn't optimize for the wellbeing of the people. It optimizes for the interests of whoever is in the room. You don't even need corruption for that, incentives are enough. Although sometimes, as Qatargate showed, there's corruption too. The result: the system has a structural incentive to accept things the people would never vote for. Take Mercosur. Twenty-five years of negotiations. France votes against it in the Council in January 2026 and gets outvoted. To keep national parliaments from blocking it, the Commission splits the deal into two texts, including a trade agreement that only needs a vote in Brussels. The European Parliament itself writes, in black and white, that this split circumvents the right of national parliaments, and refers the deal to the EU Court of Justice. The Commission's response: it has been applying the agreement provisionally since May 1, 2026, without waiting for the Court's opinion. Farmers were protesting outside Parliament. They lost anyway. And remember the one time the people were actually asked about Europe directly: in 2005, France and the Netherlands rejected the European Constitution. The text came back two years later as the Lisbon Treaty, ratified by parliaments. No more referendums. But the worst of it is immigration. In 2015, relocation quotas were imposed by qualified majority on countries that had voted against them. Since June 12, 2026, the Pact on Migration and Asylum applies across the entire Union, with its "mandatory solidarity" mechanism: you take people in, or you pay. Not a single European people has ever been consulted directly on this, even though it's the issue that is transforming our societies most profoundly. And this is where we have to talk about the most sophisticated piece of the machine: George Soros. Soros understood before anyone else that you don't need to win elections if you shape the ecosystem around the people who make decisions. His network, the Open Society Foundations, describes itself as the largest private funder of advocacy groups in the world. In Brussels, it runs its own lobbying arm aimed at EU institutions, the Open Society European Policy Institute. Here's what we know from internal documents leaked in 2016: a document titled "Reliable allies in the European Parliament" listed more than 200 MEPs. Strategy papers described building "inside-track groups" to caucus "internal allies" who could advance their goals in their daily work. Training sessions were organized for MEPs on how to counter so-called populist parties. The mechanism is brutally elegant. Think tanks produce the "expertise". NGOs produce the "demand from civil society". Legal NGOs litigate in the courts. Funded media outlets produce the narrative. The Brussels decision-maker, cut off from the population, hears the same message from every direction and ends up believing that this is what people want. And the craziest part: the institutions fund the loop themselves. Between 2021 and 2023, the EU paid around €7.4 billion to NGOs, and the European Court of Auditors found the use of that money insufficiently transparent. It even came out that the Commission had funded NGOs to lobby MEPs in favor of its own Green Deal legislation. The institution pays "civil society" to ask it to do what it already wanted to do. All of this is legal. That's exactly what makes it a hack and not a crime. The system works exactly as designed, except nobody designed it for the people anymore. The patch is simple to state and hard to impose: bring decisions back closer to the people who bear them, hold referendums on issues that change a civilization, create a mandatory register for every influence actor, NGOs included, with their funding sources, and shut the revolving door. Until that happens, European democracy will remain what it has become: a user interface sitting on top of a system that runs for someone else.
18
Kaj to pomeni "druzine naj cakajo", pridejo lahko tako kot delavec, ko izpolnijo iste pogoje, ne rabjo cakat.
Tuji delavci naj pridejo, njihove družine pa naj čakajo tri leta? Koalicija, ki družino postavlja na piedestal, bi tujcem otežila življenje z njo. So družinske vrednote samo za »naše«? zanima.me/so-druzinske-vredn…
20