Matt Evans retweeted
Why would I pay $15/month for your software when I can plan, build, review, improve, host, launch, scale, secure, patch, monitor and debug it myself?
Matt Evans retweeted
It's very easy to create a UI that 'looks' like a professional video editor. Oneshot. It's quite something else to make it behave like one. Each and every feature needs to be tweaked out. And that still takes a lot of time even with AI help.
Matt Evans retweeted
I just tried the photoshop clone, and it's completely unusable.
The thing people don't understand about software development is the bottle neck wasn't ever the implementation, but rather the care and consideration behind every choice.
Todos los productos de Adobe reimplementados desde cero, gratuitos y de código abierto
→ getartcraft.com/apps
Replying to @tannerlinsley
So good! Love the Splinter Cell franchise. I even made a fan film back when I was in college 15 years ago 😅
youtube.com/watch?v=bJnloZW0…
Replying to @notrab
Imagine this but with a full editing experience to tweak your design and animations 👀 Rolling out MCP support soon would love to get your thoughts on it dude!
These Opus 5.5 motion graphic demos are impressive. If only you could adjust everything in an editor...
Introducing editsquare.com
A GPU-powered, web-based editor. Years in the making, and we're just getting started.
Rolling out MCP to early adopters now.
Matt Evans retweeted
Any compositor who looks at this and says I won't use a tool like this because it's AI is just stupid and self-sabatoging. There is nothing precious about green screen removal. There is nothing artistic about rotoscoping. It's painful, costly, time consuming grunt work that almost nobody enjoys. And if you happen to be someone that does, do it in your own free time. No employer wants to pay for your me roto time.
Speaking as someone who has done literally hundreds of hours of roto, its about freaken time. xitter.cf/ltx_io/status/21060152…
Create your own animations with our web-based motion graphics editor (no sign-up required): app.editsquare.com
Or find out more: editsquare.com
Text animations are notoriously hard, we made them easy. Get creative with fully customisable properties and target by letter, word or line.
Mix and match to create all sorts of unique looks. Start from scratch or choose a preset from our library.
Replying to @mikeysee
Looks great! Would love to give it a spin.
Interested to see what those tabs at the top show. What things are you enjoying the most vs professional NLES like Premiere or Resolve?
Replying to @0xDesigner
100% agree.
Over the last few years we've been building a motion graphics editor and hooked Opus 5.5 up to it via our MCP. The idea being to use prompting as a starting point and then refining in an actual editor. xitter.cf/motioncoder/status/210…
These Opus 5.5 motion graphic demos are impressive. If only you could adjust everything in an editor...
Introducing editsquare.com
A GPU-powered, web-based editor. Years in the making, and we're just getting started.
Rolling out MCP to early adopters now.
Replying to @jakeinmotion
Oh really? I meant not to advocate it, more to educate how these videos are being generated and what the limitations are. Dissecting the hype, similar to your Higgs field video.
Anyways, really enjoying your recent videos. Keep up the great work!
Replying to @elie2222
👋 We've built a fully featured motion graphics editor. Our MCP is rolling out soon so users will be able to prompt & have a full editing experience to manually refine their projects. editsquare.com
Can someone show me the editing experience for these Opus 5.5 motion graphics videos?
All I've seen are one-shot examples. They have some impressive parts, but are far from deliverable and in desperate need of refinement.
Interested to see someone use it on a real project.
Replying to @jakeinmotion
Would love to see you do a video on this!
The majority of examples are all html animations which, without an editor, I can imagine being extremely tedious to refine and work with.
I find parts of these types of videos quite impressive, but far from deliverable for client work.
Replying to @marcelpociot
Working on it 🫡 LLM API pricing will likely be too expensive, but we’re focusing on accelerating workflows within our editor editsquare.com
Replying to @simonswiss
Which effort setting do you have on? I was finding the same until I tried Max effort
One shot. Opus 5.5 max.
"make a dynamic 15-second motion graphics video that shows what an incredible motion designer you are, like it's your showreel for a résumé. go all out."
Try our editor for free whilst you wait for MCP access: app.editsquare.com
These Opus 5.5 motion graphic demos are impressive. If only you could adjust everything in an editor...
Introducing editsquare.com
A GPU-powered, web-based editor. Years in the making, and we're just getting started.
Rolling out MCP to early adopters now.











