Nid

Lothar Matthäus in his @SkySportDE column: "Uli Hoeneß has made headlines with his comments about Jamal Musiala. But had anyone else made those remarks, Hoeneß would probably have been the first to take issue with them. Bayern agreed to the salary and contract length when Musiala signed his contract extension. That is precisely why the contract was signed in the first place If Hoeneß was referring to value for money, then the other side of the equation would also have to be considered - Michael Olise's salary would need to be at least doubled, if not tripled, given that his market value has risen from the €50 million Bayern paid to sign him to between €150 million and €200 million There is always a risk for both a club and a player when signing a contract, because neither side knows how things will develop. In Olise's case, his trajectory has been consistently upward over the past 18 months. If Musiala is considered to be earning too much because he is currently unavailable, then, by the same logic, Olise and other Bayern players who are outperforming expectations would be underpaid."

🏆 FIFPRO Men’s World11 2026 🏆 👏 WELL DONE, @KMBAPPE & @BELLINGHAMJUDE!