Non-Linear (@nonlinear_james) profile picture

Problem Solver

NH
Joined July 2023
Photo by Non-Linear (@nonlinear_james)Photo by Non-Linear (@nonlinear_james)Photo by Non-Linear (@nonlinear_james)Photo by Non-Linear (@nonlinear_james)Photo by Non-Linear (@nonlinear_james)Photo by Non-Linear (@nonlinear_james)Photo by Non-Linear (@nonlinear_james)Photo by Non-Linear (@nonlinear_james)Photo by Non-Linear (@nonlinear_james)
For all of those that don't understand how Trump can simultaneously start wars and end them and that it's the same thing: 1. Venezuela was becoming encamped with Chinese and Russians. It was going to become vastly more difficult to root them out, and with Venezuela so close, the interference in American business was going to grow. The socialism in the Americas was going to get worse, not better. The gang violence and drugs into the US was going to get worse not better as China funded them and supplied them product for free for the sole purpose of undermining the American system (look it up, yes it was and still is happening). It had to be dealt with. It now is. Next stop, democratic elections. Along with it, will slowly but surely come the end to the Venezuelan gangs and human trafficking over our border. And the Chinese and Russians are out of Venezuela and now largely out of the entire Americas sphere of influence. 2. Cuba was being infested with Russians and Chinese just off our shores and as the Cuban government got ever more desperate. It should have been invaded and cleaned out decades ago and wasn't. It had to be dealt with to create a lasting peace in the Caribbean. And in the process the US gets access to the Vietnam of the Caribbean with lower skilled labor than Mexico which it needs for the manufacturing revolution that is building out care of Chinese demographic collapse. 3. Iran was a 50 boil on the back of the ass of the United States created by the London establishment as a proxy to drive up insurance and lending costs. The CIA was absolutely collaborative under what Kissenger created more in touch with MI6 than with the US government by his own admission. It's one of the biggest mistakes Reagan ever made not dealing with it immediately upon taking office. If you ever want the US out of the middle east, you must deal with Iran. Treaty obligations ensure we'd be back, but this time it would be with a nuclear Iran, and funded, backed and supplied by China and Russia. Right now China is weakened and gets weaker because of the lack of black market oil that was sustaining their economy. Russia is distracted and overextended in Ukraine and as a result can't help. Now was exactly the right time to deal with Iran once and for all and set the rest of the middle east on self protection by ending the proxies of Hamas, Hezbolah and Houthis once and for all. Once they're gone, you can then extract from the middle east entirely and let it devolve into the backwater it needs to be. Until then, leaving just ensures we'll be back and in far more force than before. 4. Greenland had a treaty with holes that was going to ensure that China was going to be developing minerals and extracting resources from Greenland within 10 years. The bases that they would have established to do so would have been used to spy on the US while the US was limited to a single military base and not able to install anti ICBM systems on Greenland. Trump has gotten everything he wanted and has ensured that no Chinese or Russian company can do anything on Greenland while giving the US unlimited military presence (which will be thin because of the reality of the environment) and access to all of the resources that Greenland has. This was a must, but short sighted people couldn't see that the Europeans were about to do to Greenland what they've done to their own industrial base: Sell it out to China lock, stock, and barrel. You MUST understand power vacuums. Trump does. He's setting things up so that the US can have a light touch on the world while reaping the benefits, taking over insuring and lending of international commerce as payment for the US protecting the world's oceans and making that international commerce safe. This ends London and the British Economic Empire and gets us paid for our services, while at the same time ensuring that less of those services will be required. It is the ultimate peace plan. Libertarians can't see it, not because they're too dumb, but because they refuse to think systematically about how you actually get what Libertarians want. This is the shortest path to that there is but they just want to take their toys and go home and expect that to go well. Democrats don't like this because then there is no money funnel to steal from and no kickbacks left in the corrupt economic system that all 3 of these created. ActBlue should have shown us the truth, so understand that the military industrial complex makes USAID look like penny candy in comparison. Trump is Hadrian right now. Yet you're fighting him while he's saving you. historyextra.com/membership/…
Today, I am pleased to announce, that the last American Forces are leaving Iraq! It has been a long time, with very bad decision-making that got us involved in this quagmire in the first place, but soon, that will be part of History. This is a Great Day for America and, importantly, we leave with Iraq having a wonderful new Prime Minister, Ali al-Zaidi, somebody I supported from the beginning and fully endorsed. He won an Election that he was not expected to win, and did so, in a landslide! Launched in 2003 under the presidency of George W. Bush, and continued under the Administration of Barack Hussein Obama in 2014, and Sleepy Joe Biden, Operation Inherent Resolve ends in 2026 under the leadership of President Donald J. Trump. This Day is a victory for the United States, a victory for Iraq, and a decisive victory over ISIS, which has been completely decimated by the Trump Administration, First Term, along with other very bad and dangerous players. Unlike Afghanistan, where much Military Equipment and everything else was left behind, and 13 Warriors lie dead, with many badly wounded, this orderly departure of Coalition forces and equipment from Erbil Air Base marks the end of a very expensive excursion into Hell. I set a clear mission, gave our Commanders the tools to finish it, and refused to let a temporary presence become a permanent one. I had a choice to stay or to leave, and felt, without question, that it was time for America to go home! Prime Minister al-Zaidi, is outstanding, and he will hopefully be able to handle things very well. We came to fight a caliphate. There is no longer a caliphate. We are going home! President DONALD J. TRUMP ( TS: Sep 30 2026, 1:17 PM ET )​​​​​​​​‍‌​​‌​​​​‌​‍​‍​‍‍‍‍‌‌​‌‍​‌‍‌‌‍​‍‌‌‌
1
2
2
13
2,406
Prison.
The Alaska Dan Sullivan scandal EXPLODES. The government is now ordering a criminal investigation after the bombshell NYT reporting that the Democrat campaign in Alaska intentionally sought out spoiler candidates. This is a clear attempt to mislead voters and give Dems an unfair advantage in the upcoming election.
27
For those on NR, NMN, NAD+ or 5-Amino-MQ, here's a warning. No benefit compared to placebo by all metrics claimed by the actual manufacturer of NR, and worse on Parkinson's. youtu.be/z0JSQt4OruM
1
1
156
Except 78% of lesbian marriage ends in divorce versus 24% of homosexual men. (48% for straight) So we know for sure women are the cause of it.
I’m so sick of people quoting the statistic that 70% of divorces are initiated by women, OK so what? Just because they initiated the divorce does not mean they were the sole cause of it. Can you please grow a few more brain cells before making a statistic the justification for your entire personality.
2
1
20
410
Non-Linear retweeted
The number-one predictor of the wife filing for divorce is the husband losing his job Your odds are better if you cheat, drink too much, or beat her. But definitely don't lose your job
I’m so sick of people quoting the statistic that 70% of divorces are initiated by women, OK so what? Just because they initiated the divorce does not mean they were the sole cause of it. Can you please grow a few more brain cells before making a statistic the justification for your entire personality.
50
617
15
12,334
189,316
The EU to Canada: "Join as an associate member or pay steel tariffs" The USA to Canada: "Join as the 51st state or pay steel tariffs" Its the same offer.
107
239
8
2,211
41,337
False accusers should face at minimum the maximum punishment that their victim would have faced. Throw the fucking book at them as a warning.
False accusers should face criminal charges.
1
3
182
Non-Linear retweeted
Canadians: "We're joining the EU! Take THAT, Trump!" EU: "Yeah, take THAT, Trump!" *EU looks at Canada's complete mess of regulations, interprovincial trade barriers, and business-hostile environment* EU: "Yeah Canada, uhhhhh, don't call us, we'll call you."
EU set to scrap ‘associate member’ status offer for Canada amid internal divisions — POLITICO
69
377
13
4,611
89,507
🚨 BOMBSHELL COURT EVIDENCE EXPOSES EXPLOSIVE PRIVATE MESSAGES REVEALING COORDINATION BETWEEN KRISTIN KNOUSE AND MIT PROFESSOR SANGEETA BHATIA IN THE DAVID M. SABATINI ORDEAL. 🔱 NEW REVELATION — Court evidence exposes how Knouse and Bhatia privately celebrated Sabatini’s removal, discussed the potential destruction of his professional career, and anticipated the revocation of his @MIT tenure. An 80-message exchange between Kristin Knouse and MIT Professor Sangeeta Bhatia, dated August 20–21, 2021, reveals their private reactions immediately following Whitehead Institute and HHMI's severance of ties with Professor @DMSabatini. The communications contain statements that deserve serious public examination. 🔴 1. “YOU DID IT” — “AND HE’S OUT.” On August 20, 2021, Bhatia congratulated Knouse: 🔴 “YOU DID IT. You crossed the finish line. It's out in the open. And you're not out in the open. And you're on the faculty. And he's out.” Knouse responded: 🔴 “You connecting me to Nancy [Hopkins]was the turning point. I will never forget that walk in Lexington.” 🔴 2. “THIS WAS THE OUTCOME I DREAMED OF.” The following morning, as news coverage spread, Knouse discussed the possibility of Sabatini losing his MIT tenure: 🔴 “Hard to imagine MIT will be left with any choice other than to revoke tenure.” Bhatia responded: 🔴 “You're right about tenure” She subsequently wrote: 🔴 “This was the outcome I dreamed of but NEVER certain I would get it.” Knouse also described her assessment of Whitehead's handling of the matter: 🔴 “And as skeptical as I was of Whitehead's end game, in the end I think the overall process was perfectly executed.” Bhatia expressed her approval of Whitehead Institute Director Ruth Lehmann: 🔴 “I'm proud of Ruth [Lehmann]” These exchanges occurred months before MIT's April 2022 tenure-revocation recommendation. 🔴 3. THE PROFESSIONAL CONSEQUENCES — BEYOND WHITEHEAD. The participants also discussed Sabatini's corporate affiliations and prospects for future employment. Knouse wrote: 🔴 “I know of one company already speaking with lawyers to remove him on grounds of morality clause.” She subsequently stated: 🔴 “Hard to imagine how he can be gainfully employed anywhere after the past 24 hours ...” These were not merely discussions about an institutional investigation. They extended to the potential consequences for Sabatini's career, tenure, corporate affiliations, and future livelihood. 🔴 4. THE DIVERSITY SURVEY AND PROTECTION FROM PUBLIC IDENTIFICATION. In another particularly consequential exchange, Bhatia wrote: 🔴 “Also the dei survey and subsequent investigation really protects you, which I love. There is not even a scent of whistleblower in all the press.” This statement takes on particular significance alongside the previously disclosed communications in which Knouse and Nora Kory discussed using Whitehead's diversity survey to conceal an investigation already under consideration (📑 see the original court evidence in the first comment below). 🔴 5. “WE DRANK CHAMPAGNE” — CELEBRATING AS THE NEWS SPREAD. Perhaps the most striking exchange appears on KK011419. On August 21, 2021, Knouse declared: 🔴 “I KNOW! Young people took down a relatively young king. Progress, progress, progress.” Knouse also wrote: 🔴 “Two other women who came forward and I drank champagne while watching the Tweets and articles roll in last night. It felt like campaign headquarters after an election victory. Really special.” Bhatia responded: 🔴 “That's awesome.” These exchanges reinforce the serious concerns about coordination and conflicts of interest raised by our previous disclosures. Their significance must be assessed alongside the full documentary record and the subsequent jury verdict. The scientific community deserves full accountability for any misconduct established by the evidence, including the roles of individuals who participated in or improperly influenced the institutional processes that subjected Professor Sabatini to a devastating ordeal and profoundly damaged his career. 📑 REVIEW THE ORIGINAL COURT EVIDENCE BELOW. 🔱 ScienceGuardians™ Legal and Investigative Team MORE COURT EVIDENCE. MORE REVELATIONS. STAY TUNED. ⚠️ @SciGuardians 🔱
Replying to @SciGuardians
🔱 Part 5 — Joint Appendix JA004741: Court evidence reveals reported support and pressure involving senior MIT faculty 🚨 Court documents reveal that Kristin Knouse described support from influential MIT faculty members during the proceedings concerning Professor David M. Sabatini. ⚠️ In messages dated 13 October 2021, Knouse identified support attributed to senior MIT figures and described their willingness to approach MIT President Rafael Reif to influence the institutional outcome. These communications document efforts to mobilize influential individuals within MIT during Sabatini's tenure-review proceedings. 📑 THE ORIGINAL COURT EVIDENCE IS PRESENTED BELOW.
90
199
60
1,211
509,683
So ya, AI peer review drastically improves the quality. Now there needs to be an AI believability gate that sniffs out all of the bullshit in the data and outlines all of the weaknesses and those have to be included in the final paper.
Lots of debate this week on whether journals should ban AI in peer review. We actually tested this in our new preprint, and the results were pretty clear to me. For context, I've reviewed for most of the big journals and evaluated 1,000 human reviews as an editor. I love to read and evaluate science. TLDR: From now on I won't do any peer review without AI. For clinical trials, I'd even call human-only review dangerous 🧵
1
118
This is code for they want to increase the budget by 1.4million than inflation. It’s not a cut. It’s the exact purpose of the question
2
5
39
1,041
It’s all just envy and resentment. The bottom quintile of white males is average performance of most of the rest in the west. The average white male is top 2-3% of the rest. The extraordinary white male is unmatched by anyone other than a hand full of outliers and some East Asian men whom also have the creativity and non-linear thinking of white males. And white males are also top 10% strength, endurance, etc of all men and thus can do anything while also being the primary inventors of everything. Women resent men but especially white men because white men only depend on women for reproduction while women depend on white men for literally all of civilization, their rights, freedoms, and security. Everyone else? Pure jealousy.
She is complaining that White males even as children are more efficient than she can even comprehend
2
6
282
Child support should both be tied to what you make AND not require that you also keep the mother at those standards and if the court believes your standard of living is better for the kids they should award the kids to you.
Dave Foley was ordered to pay his ex-wife $17,700 a month in child support. That was five times what he actually earned. If he set foot in Canada, he would be arrested at the border. When he asked the judge how he’d feed his daughter from his second marriage, he says the court’s answer was simple: “They can rot in hell.” In 1997, Foley was starring on NBC’s NewsRadio and making about $1 million a year. That year, he separated from his first wife, Tabatha Southey. An Ontario judge set his payments at $17,700 a month, or $212,400 a year after taxes, based on his sitcom salary. Two years later, NBC canceled the show. His income dropped by nearly 80%. He went back to court to lower the payments. The judge said no. The court ruled he had made $1 million once, so he should keep paying like he still did. His ex-wife lived in a $2.5 million house on a park in Toronto. Foley rented a small loft in downtown LA. By 2011, he owed more than $500,000 in back payments. Ontario threatened to pull his passport and issued a warrant for his arrest if he came home. In the video below, Foley explains the math: “I’m paying about five times my income every month in child support, based on a show that hasn’t been on for 12 years.” He couldn’t work in Canada again until he landed a new sitcom in 2014 and had his paychecks garnished at the source. The case for the court: a parent shouldn’t get to slash support just because their career slows down. The case for Dave: locking a canceled actor into 1990s sitcom money under threat of prison is extortion. Should child support be tied to what you earn today, or the best year you ever had?
3
259
Indeed. H1B go first Microsoft. That’s literally the law.
‼️BREAKING EXCLUSIVE LEAK: 10/28 Microsoft Company Wide AMA Meeting LEAKED “We are going to be global. And we are going to continue to bring global talent to the United States.” “We want to recognize it’s super important we take care of the people (green card workers).” This comes just 2 days after Microsoft asked nearly 60k of its employees to voluntarily resign in an effort to downsize. The employee who leaked this clip of the meeting to me was one of many who have expressed concerns to me. Multiple Microsoft employees have told me they feel as though MSFT doesn’t give them the same amount of respect and care. Many Microsoft employees are asking why H-1B workers aren’t the first to be cut during a downsize since MSFT claims none of the downsizing is performance based. Employees are curious why American workers aren’t being put first in the United States.
2
156
No they're not. They're aging out and settling for the beta suck ups looking for sex after the alphas didn't commit.
Women are ditching alpha males for more 'emotionally available' partners: research trib.al/DdwUl2r
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
The cited "research" is a survey by Chyrpe, a niche dating app built for female-led/femdom relationships and users seeking that dynamic, not a representative or scientific study of women generally. chyrpe.com greatergood.berkeley.edu/article/item/t… pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC59…
9
227
Facts 🧐
If High IQ men were as willing to initiate violence as Low IQ men There would be no Low IQ men.
28
86
2
1,174
24,802
Sure let’s set up a system where renters are only required to pay 1/3 of their rent while their landlord AND the taxpayer is responsible for the other two thirds because “going to court is stressful for tenants”. 🥴
Every year, thousands of DC residents lose their homes over unpaid rent. Most owe less than $5,000. Going to court is stressful for tenants, expensive for landlords, and slows down the system. We need a better way to resolve rent issues. 🧵⬇️
5
1
64
743
Set a class size minimum of 26:1. You cut property taxes by 33% automatically on average around the state. 1 SAU per county. 1 school board with proportional representation per county. You close all of the schoos you no longer need and lease them out, or have them take over the bonds. You're done.
NEW: Josiah Bartlett Center poll finds that NH voters want property tax relief, and they want it to come from local governments controlling spending, not additional state aid funded by higher taxes. jbartlett.org/2026/10/nh-vot…
1
1
1
4
222
Non-Linear retweeted
I got to witness this first hand in the NH House. A Republican stood at the mic and read a page from a book that @NHHouseDems defended as being age appropriate for children, and yet the Dems couldn't handle hearing about genderqueer blowjobs and started screaming and booing
This thing where liberals have uncontrollable audible outbursts whenever they hear something they disagree with really needs to be studied. What in the world is going on there? I’m being totally serious. I’m not trying to make fun of anybody here or just saying something snarky. It’s very strange the way they audibly gasp whenever they hear something with which they disagree. I’ve never once heard a conservative do this. Go watch an Ann Colter video from 20 years ago where she speaks to a liberal college audience. They literally cannot sit still and listen to somebody say something with which they disagree. Nervous laughter, audible moans and groans, literal gasps. And every other speaker who goes up to the mic feels compelled to ask her, “do you really believe what you’re saying? I mean, is this a bit or do you really believe it?” Again, I’m not trying to be funny or snarky here. It’s very weird how just one political faction does this.
16
56
5
567
5,337