Obj ꕤ retweeted
There is an English word used to refer to a particular place, position, location, or point that is away from the speaker or has already been mentioned in a conversation. It indicates where a person, object, event, or situation exists, occurs, or can be found.
I was setup on the 24th . I was sick and someone I thought is my friend said she wants to send me a package. She knew I left my former location and traveled for break..
I sent her my address as she said she wanted to send me a get well soon package. This acct @Wchellebaby
I noticed the rider was sus, so I got pissed and blocked the number and said I don't want anymore.
She kept pleading I said I will send her money back.
Not knowing this girl was trying to get an unknown person to find my location and take me away.
I was even pissed that I was stressed not knowing she was setting me up with some unknown guys and this girl was begging me to step out of the house that there is a package.
Obj ꕤ retweeted
Winner announcement in 24 hours! We'll randomly draw 100 eligible winners with help from @grok. Make sure you follow us, like & repost to be in the running. Good luck! 🍀
Obj ꕤ retweeted
Legendary traders made fortunes with very different setups and they all follow the same few rules.
Jesse Livermore : Pivotal-point breakout, adding only to winners
William O'Neil : CAN SLIM cup handle breakout
Nicolas Darvas : Box Breakout on new highs
Mark Minervini : VCP with Trend Template
Stan Weinstein : Stage 2 breakout + rising 30Week MA
Ed Seykota : EMA crossover trend following
Paul Tudor : 200-day MA rule & 5:1 asymmetric bets
Kristjan Qullamaggie: High ADR flag breakouts & EP
Linda Raschke : Pullback to 20 EMA when ADX is >30
Pradeep Bonde : 4% Momentum Burst
Dan Zanger : Chart-pattern breakouts on large volume
Larry Williams : Volatility breakout and Williams %R
David Ryan – CAN SLIM bases
What they share
1-Small, fixed losses and no averaging down.
2-Many win less than half the time.
3-Trade only strong stocks.
4-Concentration is Magic to them
5-Position size comes from the stop.
6-Discipline matters more than the setup.
Obj ꕤ retweeted
“You can’t decompile video games and sell people new products composed of old intellectual properties.”
Brother my president insider trades daily and none of my peers will own a house until 40.
A child not embraced by the village will burn it down to feel it’s warmth.
Obj ꕤ retweeted
you have to understand the K-shaped outcome in alts
IMO there is 0 alpha in longing tokens CT is shilling. in fact, the best performers have been in the tokens CT haven't talked about - BP, LIT, VVV - I see no one here talking about them.
longing MON / WLD / etc. as catalyst trades are trades that rely on the incremental believer to believe in them. but the moment i look at these tickers, i know there's nothing much fundamental about them.
instead, allocators with large amounts of $ are digging into the weeds finding tokens that have growing users / revenue / are undervalued and buying those tokens instead
buy and hodl. it works. see hype. but few will do it.
TLDR: like all markets crypto is becoming K-shaped in itself. you have two ends of th K - top end is growing fundamentals in growing businesses which will slowly accrue more flows over time
bottom K is on-chain getting rekt by lemon markets (read: Claude / AI making it incredibly difficult to differentiate real projects) - last time maybe you had 10 out of 100 projects that were good. now it's 10 out of 10,000. the % chance of getting needle in the haystack is lower and lower, and all value in the bottom of K will accrue to scammers, KOLs, or P&Ders
i wrote yesterday that catalyst trades don't work anymore for the same reason. in a K-shaped world, most of the money flows towards assets people are comfortable buying and holding in - taking one-off catalyst trades for protocols which otherwise have no underlying fundamentals is akin to playing at the poker table with a bunch of other starving people who have been rummaging through the trash (on-chain) and are desperate for some win. very simply, the flows don't support this anymore - and we've seen it in PA. sharp price action both ways.
and this is a feedback loop in and of itself. as more and more people lose money trying to play negative sum games (and these ARE negative sum games because everyone loses except the house), more and more people will flock to positive sum games (growing fundamentals are net winning for everyone, see HYPE as the best example)
we've already seen this play out years and years in crypto. we are just finally at the culmination of it all. 2018, 2021, 2024, all the same shit. just that the only difference now is that you can opt out to play positive sum games, whereas in the past, you had no other choice.
long those growing fundamentals. don't give a shit about the rest. and hold.
i will say that the investors playbook is extremely clear right now, but majority of retail will still choose to play negative sum games either because they have deluded themselves into believing they have some sort of edge (1 big win => i am good => many small losses => lose it all) or they are too short term to do any of the stated above
it's really up to you. good luck.
