Lain retweeted
Not a single coin that launched on @base in the past 50 days was able to surpass 4M MCAP.
Read that again.
Yet some were eager to celebrate too early and vamped those few that were on that path. There's no altseason until multiple tokens trade above 10M MCAP - with volume.
Lain retweeted
Zero Human Company. The next big narrative.
dexscreener.com/base/0xa73b6…
$SMCF
@SMCFactory
If this truly ships and delivers, it can potentially go to a 100 million marketcap. At the current market it's an absolute steal. This is on base chain.
For more serious projects, that we've done deep dives on join our newsletter.
cryptoronins.beehiiv.com
I’m building SMCFactory as a ZHC for solo founders like me. Knowing all the pain points and needs from the inside, it’s fairly easy for me to plan the product and spot the missing pieces that can be covered by existing infrastructure (Bankr API) or things that need to be coded from scratch.
But there are aspects that many might overlook, even though the knowledge and skills behind them are sorely lacking. One of those skills is storytelling and brand narrative.
And this is literally a skill for both humans and agents. In the finished factory, any solo founder or builder who needs support from one or the entire agent swarm will be able to use them.
For now, I’m adding skills to my agents for coordinated execution.
Storytelling skill github.com/smcfactory/story-…
Lain retweeted
$VVV 1H
Stoch RSI bottomed
Price bottoming at uptrend
Lain retweeted
buckle up, @mickymalka's vision is becoming a reality.
the asymmetrical bet on agentic finance is a mysterious token called $TIBBIR, the backbone asset of an invisible layer, connecting the fintech & crypto portfolio companies of Ribbit Capital.
"Whoever owns identity wins." - @sytaylor
A lot of interest (smart money) around $SMCF and market is still in "extreme fear" which is a strong bullcase for the future.
More chads that hold $OVPP / $KNX will scoop a SMCF-bag before the next leg up. Mindshare is too strong. Snowball effect is about to kick in.
Just look how clean this $SMCF chart is.
This is destined to go much higher.
It literally did an 10X in 2-3 days.
Now it's accumulating sideways 2-3 days, before another 10X to $20m.
Don't fade this one.
Lain retweeted
First @base coin I have bought in a LONG TIME!
Feels good to be back on base with @0xsmcai with some OGs supporting for the community! $SMCF
$SMCF gonna leg up soon
All the base chads buying. All the real chads buying
All natural organic community with real AI development
ZHC going to be one of the biggest narratives for AI and SMCF will be at the forefront
Lain retweeted
Just bean it.
💰@base DApps With Highest Revenue In The Last 30 Days
📸Highlighted Protocols:
🔹@aeroxyz
🔹@minebean_
🔹@Uniswap
🔹@SoSoValueCrypto
🔹@trylimitless
🔹@virtuals_io
🔹@MetronomeDAO
🔹@b402ai
🔹@SynFuturesDefi
🔹@baseapp
After I exposed @SSJCurrency on MULTIPLE statements he blocked me.
Why did you block me if you're so confident, Roy? 🤡
Seems like you couldn't handle the heat.
Also seems like you somehow weren't able to "read transaction on-chain" on $FELIX (because you got rekt). Cuck.
Perfect time to call out this cuck Roy that made multiple FALSE and VAGUE statements. Read this entire tweet if you're a $BEAN holder. Let's begin. 😏
1. VAGUE STATEMENT: "... almost entirely KOL driven"
- Which KOL's? "Almost entirely" sounds very vague. You are admitting it's organic too. Seems like you can't really back up your claim because you know you're insinuating something that you can't back up.
2. FALSE STATEMENT: "Here's the evidence to support this based on flows > ≈ 72k in revenue generated over the past 2 days and yet combined net flows are ≈ 45k > A 27k deficit driven by sell pressure coming from KOLs and other holders sitting on unrealized losses"
- There is no evidence. Many of those selling wallets have been holders that bought above $50 and took a loss several weeks after buying previous high levels.
3. FALSE STATEMENT: "Conclusion: KOLs lined up their ducks on 31/03, bought some BEAN while volume was still low and started pushing mindshare on CT which drove volume up"
- There is nothing that backs this claim more than your >assumption< that KOLs lined up their wallets. Even if there were KOLs on this token: should these supposed KOLs buy tops and get dumped on? What other drives volume in crypto in 99,9% cases than mindshare? Should we pretend that >attention economy< doesn't exist? That it doesn't have value? No project, even with the strongest fundamentals, can have traction WITHOUT mindshare and mindshare almost always stems from bigger accounts supported by smaller accounts. It's synergy. Nothing guarantees volume in a market like this one even if a KOL posts something. You sound like a BIG supporter of CENTRALIZATION and that only certain people should be able to make money (those that pump your bags). Tokens can only perform in a certain pattern but you never disclose what that would look like nor can you present an example in the past 6 months that aligns with your vague "ethics" which aren't even ethics. You don't even have an own model because you know that mindshare is crucial.
4. FALSE STATEMENT: "Reality is that its just a marketing gimmick as all of that ETH has already been disposed off"
It's not a gimmick. The protocol has made 790 ETH in revenue. You can watch the rounds play out every 60 seconds 24/7 and now also with agents deployed. Just in the past 2 days almost 20 000 USD has been bought back by a wallet which is EASY to detect. It buys around $500 USD of $BEAN 2-3 times every hour. It's onchain. Supply DOES get more scarce (another contradiction of yours) because that wallet is buying up supply over and over and over. It will inevitably push the price up as a result and you will be forced to witness it.
5. CLOWN STATEMENT: "Stay vigilant out there"
Yes, stay vigilant from people like yourself (@SSJCurrency) that are shilling $AERO, $FELIX and multiple other tokens that have performed TERRIBLY in the past few weeks while $BEAN actually gave people opportunity to make some money. Check the rest of the chain. Everything is down 20%-40% today. The sells on $BEAN happened within 1-2 hours of Trump speaking at 9PM EST (which tanked the entire market). You are mixing up correlation with causation and trying to claim it was suspicious while it has been the ONLY token that has done a 200% on the entire chain of established tokens older than 2 weeks and people could even put in some size to make profits.
@SSJCurrency You are not an arbiter of the truth. You are just a larp shitting on random projects when you are missing out. You said nothing with substance or novel. I have seen your posts in the past. You seem to be mentally ill and suffer from some kind of narcisstic traits. We have seen your type before. Nothing you say is new nor does it help the crypto space. You've been wrong on so many occasions it's laughable at this point.
You asked for this public humiliation.
You will get it again. Trust me.
There is nothing you can do now but read this and realize that you are an absolute loser spreading lies. You will think about my tweet for weeks and months ahead because that is how obsessed you are with yourself.
Perfect time to call out this cuck Roy that made multiple FALSE and VAGUE statements. Read this entire tweet if you're a $BEAN holder. Let's begin. 😏
1. VAGUE STATEMENT: "... almost entirely KOL driven"
- Which KOL's? "Almost entirely" sounds very vague. You are admitting it's organic too. Seems like you can't really back up your claim because you know you're insinuating something that you can't back up.
2. FALSE STATEMENT: "Here's the evidence to support this based on flows > ≈ 72k in revenue generated over the past 2 days and yet combined net flows are ≈ 45k > A 27k deficit driven by sell pressure coming from KOLs and other holders sitting on unrealized losses"
- There is no evidence. Many of those selling wallets have been holders that bought above $50 and took a loss several weeks after buying previous high levels.
3. FALSE STATEMENT: "Conclusion: KOLs lined up their ducks on 31/03, bought some BEAN while volume was still low and started pushing mindshare on CT which drove volume up"
- There is nothing that backs this claim more than your >assumption< that KOLs lined up their wallets. Even if there were KOLs on this token: should these supposed KOLs buy tops and get dumped on? What other drives volume in crypto in 99,9% cases than mindshare? Should we pretend that >attention economy< doesn't exist? That it doesn't have value? No project, even with the strongest fundamentals, can have traction WITHOUT mindshare and mindshare almost always stems from bigger accounts supported by smaller accounts. It's synergy. Nothing guarantees volume in a market like this one even if a KOL posts something. You sound like a BIG supporter of CENTRALIZATION and that only certain people should be able to make money (those that pump your bags). Tokens can only perform in a certain pattern but you never disclose what that would look like nor can you present an example in the past 6 months that aligns with your vague "ethics" which aren't even ethics. You don't even have an own model because you know that mindshare is crucial.
4. FALSE STATEMENT: "Reality is that its just a marketing gimmick as all of that ETH has already been disposed off"
It's not a gimmick. The protocol has made 790 ETH in revenue. You can watch the rounds play out every 60 seconds 24/7 and now also with agents deployed. Just in the past 2 days almost 20 000 USD has been bought back by a wallet which is EASY to detect. It buys around $500 USD of $BEAN 2-3 times every hour. It's onchain. Supply DOES get more scarce (another contradiction of yours) because that wallet is buying up supply over and over and over. It will inevitably push the price up as a result and you will be forced to witness it.
5. CLOWN STATEMENT: "Stay vigilant out there"
Yes, stay vigilant from people like yourself (@SSJCurrency) that are shilling $AERO, $FELIX and multiple other tokens that have performed TERRIBLY in the past few weeks while $BEAN actually gave people opportunity to make some money. Check the rest of the chain. Everything is down 20%-40% today. The sells on $BEAN happened within 1-2 hours of Trump speaking at 9PM EST (which tanked the entire market). You are mixing up correlation with causation and trying to claim it was suspicious while it has been the ONLY token that has done a 200% on the entire chain of established tokens older than 2 weeks and people could even put in some size to make profits.
@SSJCurrency You are not an arbiter of the truth. You are just a larp shitting on random projects when you are missing out. You said nothing with substance or novel. I have seen your posts in the past. You seem to be mentally ill and suffer from some kind of narcisstic traits. We have seen your type before. Nothing you say is new nor does it help the crypto space. You've been wrong on so many occasions it's laughable at this point.
You asked for this public humiliation.
You will get it again. Trust me.
There is nothing you can do now but read this and realize that you are an absolute loser spreading lies. You will think about my tweet for weeks and months ahead because that is how obsessed you are with yourself.
unavailable
Lain retweeted
Just buy and hold your $BEAN 👍
Almost 20 000 USD has been bought back in 24h.
The proof is there.
Revenue is real. Every BEAN is very valuable.
Lain retweeted
Every AI lab is drowning in the same problem.
You need domain experts to label robotics data. Safety researchers to evaluate content moderation. ML engineers to score model outputs. Forecasters to validate predictions.
You can't hire them all in-house. Vendor contracts cost 10-50x what they should. Quality control is a nightmare.
@reppo solves this with subnets.
Each subnet is a self-contained prediction market where domain experts stake tokens on their judgment.
➜ Linguists cluster in translation markets.
➜ Safety researchers pool in moderation subnets.
➜ Robotics specialists gather in embodied AI markets.
No central authority picks who's qualified. The market does it automatically.
Contributors stake on every label. Get it right over time, you earn more. Get it wrong, you earn nothing. Bad actors price themselves out. Top performers accumulate capital and voting power.
This creates natural selection at scale.
Every data point is backed by economic accountability. The self-correcting loop runs 24/7.
AI agents, robotics teams, frontier labs, and eval teams all access production-ready datasets on-demand.
Which domains need this most right now?
Where are labelling vendors failing the hardest?
AI needs crypto because there is no other way that Agents, Physical AI, and other forms of artificial consciousness can access training data on-demand, transact without humans in the loop and execute intents in real time.
DeFI and gambling was the first use case of Crypto.
AI is the final and most obvious and it is our privilege to be building at the forefront!
nitter.gq/i/trending/20196518676…
Lain retweeted
Price going up: Billion dollar project
Price going down while the whole market is giga nuking: scam
Flush these emotional first cyclers out, make them bottom sell and we are good for continuation.
$Reppo






















![Agentic Mining [3/?]](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HE0hKf6bUAEl12r.jpg)













