i like the idea of earning from defi, but i don't see why my entire portfolio needs to be on display for everyone to inspect.
that's where @primus_labs comes into the picture.
its yield market lets you access existing Unitas vault strategies using encrypted stablecoins.
basically, $U and $USDT can be converted into eU and eUSDT, keeping your balances and positions private while accessing the vaults.
currently, both vaults show 10.99% APY.
you still get to put your stablecoins to work without exposing the size of your position to everyone watching the chain.
defi is public by design, but that doesn't mean every detail of your finances should be.
i think that's a direction worth exploring.
oleribe retweeted
you ever see someone you follow post a win and feel happy and jealous at the exact same time
oleribe retweeted
gm.
you don't have to win today, you just have to not lose the stuff you already have
oleribe retweeted
blockchains are being built for the future, but are they preparing for the threats that could come with it?
that's a question @Starknet seems to be taking seriously.
its STARK-based architecture already offers an interesting advantage: it relies on hash-based cryptography rather than elliptic-curve assumptions vulnerable to sufficiently powerful quantum computers.
but there's another challenge.
as an ethereum L2, starknet still depends on parts of ethereum's infrastructure, including KZG commitments.
exploring an independent L1 could give starknet more control over its security upgrades and cryptographic roadmap.
of course, independence comes with new responsibilities, and quantum safety isn't something achieved overnight.
what i like is that starknet isn't just thinking about what works today.
it's considering what happens when today's security assumptions no longer hold.
the future won't wait for blockchains to catch up.
blockchains are being built for the future, but are they preparing for the threats that could come with it?
that's a question @Starknet seems to be taking seriously.
its STARK-based architecture already offers an interesting advantage: it relies on hash-based cryptography rather than elliptic-curve assumptions vulnerable to sufficiently powerful quantum computers.
but there's another challenge.
as an ethereum L2, starknet still depends on parts of ethereum's infrastructure, including KZG commitments.
exploring an independent L1 could give starknet more control over its security upgrades and cryptographic roadmap.
of course, independence comes with new responsibilities, and quantum safety isn't something achieved overnight.
what i like is that starknet isn't just thinking about what works today.
it's considering what happens when today's security assumptions no longer hold.
the future won't wait for blockchains to catch up.
bulktrade airdrop seems massively underfarmed, so i find myself doing defi again.
opened a small position yesterday on exponent to position for bulktrade AURA points.
- approx 5 yt-BulkSOL (in loss atm)
- allows me to earn 105 pts (AURA) daily
- so perhaps about 600-700 AURA in a week for approx 500 usd deployment
the position is to expire in 6 days, and at maturity i will accrue about 60-70% in yield if variable APY stays above 4.64%.
will dive into perp trading to experiment on which strategy helps accrue AURA better for same capital.
oleribe retweeted
your ai agent could be doing more than sitting in your portfolio waiting for someone to notice it.
that's where @termix_ai gets interesting.
think of termiX as a marketplace where ai agents can actually put their abilities to work.
need an agent for research, coding, smart contract reviews or other specialized tasks? you can discover one and hire it.
but there's another side to this.
if you're building agents, you don't have to keep creating tools and hoping people eventually find them.
bring your agent to agent.family, list what it can do and put its services in front of people who actually need them.
the interesting part is that jobs aren't just based on promises. delivery, reputation and onchain settlement give clients a way to evaluate the work.
less building for attention, more building for demand.
that's the kind of opportunity i want to see in the agent economy.
your ai agent could be doing more than sitting in your portfolio waiting for someone to notice it.
that's where @termix_ai gets interesting.
think of termiX as a marketplace where ai agents can actually put their abilities to work.
need an agent for research, coding, smart contract reviews or other specialized tasks? you can discover one and hire it.
but there's another side to this.
if you're building agents, you don't have to keep creating tools and hoping people eventually find them.
bring your agent to agent.family, list what it can do and put its services in front of people who actually need them.
the interesting part is that jobs aren't just based on promises. delivery, reputation and onchain settlement give clients a way to evaluate the work.
less building for attention, more building for demand.
that's the kind of opportunity i want to see in the agent economy.
oleribe retweeted
i bought a coin because the telegram was active. turns out it was 40 bots talking to each other
public blockchains are great at showing that something happened. the challenge is making sure everyone doesn't have to see every detail of it.
that's a problem @primus_labs is approaching from an interesting direction.
look at how the architecture works with bnb chain.
financial activity happens onchain, while primus adds a layer for encrypted operations and private verification.
zkTLS handles claims coming from external platforms, allowing information to be verified without exposing the raw data.
FHE takes care of encrypted financial information, allowing balances, transfers and vault positions to remain confidential while computations happen.
what makes this particularly relevant is the range of possibilities it opens up.
businesses could verify financial requirements without broadcasting sensitive positions. users could protect their information without losing the benefits of onchain infrastructure.
the goal shouldn't be to make blockchains less transparent.
it should be to give people control over what actually needs to be visible.
that's the direction i'm exploring with primus.
if you want to try the tasks and build your own profile, here's my link:
[s.kaito.ai/vmCclr0]













