Eng. ver of @OmotTomoSuda 3D modeller in AEC who code and a web dev by night
Joined April 2023
- Tweets484
- Following627
- Followers96
- Likes1.3K
Pinned Tweet
Tweets mostly in Japanese @OmotTomoSuda. I just prefer to have a separate account for different languages ok...?
8 sec in the video, I just kinda have to pose the video to listen to the song.. lol @KaiLentit
I’ve been developing modeling/ coding agent for rhino (3 CAD)/ grasshopper as pi extention. It will be open sourced soon and can’t wait to try it with new @MiniMax_AI 3.0 as I’ve been having quite good success with latest z.ai model but not so much with 2.7…🥲
getting v annoyed by this tendency in my field (aec)
stop pretending some vibe coded pure html+js app can replace the entire generations of web dev.
if it helps solves the problem you have and u r happy using it then fair enough. but it's jus not what i c often.
tomoS retweeted
It isn't unexpected that the focus of the Bun Rust rewrite is on the anti-Zig side more than anything, since the internet loves to hate. What is unexpected and unfortunate is that leadership within Bun hasn't tried to steer the conversation away from that at all.
There are so many positive and interesting takeaways from this and I'm not really seeing any of them pushed as the primary message.
A positive thing that hasn't been talked about at all is how far Bun came thanks to Zig. And even if you dump it now, its meaningful for how good Zig was to even build a product to this point and impact by any metric. I would've loved to see anyone in leadership say this.
On the interesting side is how fungible programming languages are nowadays. Programming languages used to be LOCK IN, and they're increasingly not so. You think the Bun rewrite in Rust is good for Rust? Bun has shown they can be in probably any language they want in roughly a week or two. Rust is expendable. Its useful until its not then it can be thrown out. That's interesting!
There's been a lot of talk about memory safety and no doubt Rust provides more guarantees than Zig. But I'd love to see a better analysis of why Bun in particular suffered so much rather than take the language-blame path. How could engineering as a practice been more rigorous to prevent this? What were the largest sources of crashes other programs should watch out for? How does Rust prevent them? How could Zig theoretically prevent them? That's interesting.
I know the official blog post hasn't come out yet from Bun. But they're smart enough to know that that PR would stir up controversy the moment it opened, or they should've been. And plenty in the company have been tweeting and writing about it. Its somewhat telling to me in various dimensions what they chose to talk about first.
I tend to think I'm pretty good at corporate PR/comms (especially when it comes to developer audiences) and I think appealing to the negative is never the right long term strategy; it does work to get short term eyes though.
tomoS retweeted
Scaling laws push model capability forward. But whether that capability becomes reliable in production depends on how we handle Scaling Pain.
z.ai/blog/scaling-pain
In our latest blog, we share how we debugged GLM-5 serving at scale: reproducing rare garbled outputs, repetition, and rare-character generation; tracing and eliminating KV Cache race conditions; fixing HiCache synchronization issues; and introducing LayerSplit for up to 132% throughput improvement.
We hope these lessons help the community avoid similar pitfalls and build more robust inference infrastructure.
tomoS retweeted
At this point, this is just irresponsible.
Yes, coding agents are leading to an increase of software production, but we are not seeing a similar push or increase in software quality.
If Anthropic focuses on safety and it believes software engineering is going away, then it needs to be doing much more to improve how we design, build, test, and maintain software (aka software engineering). Increasing the production of unreliable, poorly designed, and unverified software directly undermines safety.
Claude Code is claimed to be "fully written by AI". In the last two months, it took three separate postmortem-worthy failures and user complaints to surface what their own testing missed. Yesterday users were being over billed by hundreds of dollars. Software engineering isn't ready to go away and there is not enough progress to argue that case.
I am certain Anthropic would argue that AI progress in other domains is strongly dependent on having proper safeguards in place. I can't wrap my head around the cognitive dissonance when it comes to software.
PS: Mythos (may) improve software security, but that is only a subset of safety.
tomoS retweeted
Introducing MiniMax-M2.7, our first model which deeply participated in its own evolution, with an 88% win-rate vs M2.5
- Production-Ready SWE: With SOTA performance in SWE-Pro (56.22%) and Terminal Bench 2 (57.0%), M2.7 reduced intervention-to-recovery time for online incidents to 3-min on certain occasions.
- Advanced Agentic Abilities: Trained for Agent Teams and tool search tool, with 97% skill adherence across 40+ complex skills. M2.7 is on par with Sonnet 4.6 in OpenClaw.
- Professional Workspace: SOTA in professional knowledge, supports multi-turn, high-fidelity Office file editing.
MiniMax Agent: agent.minimax.io
API: platform.minimax.io
Token Plan: platform.minimax.io/subscrib…
tomoS retweeted
🌏 We are happy to announce the first DuckCon in the APAC region: DuckCon #7 will take place in the National Gallery Singapore on 2026-05-05.
🗳️ Registration and the Call for Talks are open! Submit your proposals until 2026-03-18.
➡️ duckdb.org/events/2026/05/05…
Kinda insane how easy it is to be able to use sdl3 from zig.
all I wanted was a low-level enough primitives for me to be able to draw sth in window, used to for some graphic or game library/ engine of some sort - feels lots simpler without those abstractions for my needs!